Vigilance Behaviour of Wild Herbivores when Foraging With or Without Livestock

Angelamercy Baltazary, E. Røskaft, A. Treydte
{"title":"Vigilance Behaviour of Wild Herbivores when Foraging With or Without Livestock","authors":"Angelamercy Baltazary, E. Røskaft, A. Treydte","doi":"10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In African savannas, and many other rangelands around the world, wildlife presently find themselves interacting with livestock. Many studies have been conducted on vigilance behaviour in response to presence of predators on foraging grounds, but few scientists have included the presence of livestock and how this affects vigilance when foraging together with wild herbivores. As Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) is an important example of wildlife grazing together with livestock, this phenomenon must be understood to achieve a sustainable land use management plan, particularly in Ngorongoro Conservation Area and in other protected areas. Behavioral observations of wildlife and livestock species were conducted from a vehicle driving along transects within NCA. Once a group was sighted the vehicle was stopped and sighting information recorded. Four species of wild herbivores including plains zebra (Equus burchelli), Thomson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsonii), Grant’s gazelle (Gazella granti) and Wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) were studied together with the following livestock species including cattle (Bos taurus), goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) and sheep (Ovis aries), in different seasons. 158 groups were recorded. In dry season 47 non –mixed groups (without livestock) and 30 mixed groups (with livestock) were recorded, while, during wet season 49 non -mixed groups and 32 mixed groups were recorded. Behavior was classified as feeding, grooming, laying down, ruminating, grooming, moving, and looking with head up (vigilance) with the use of the focal animal sampling method. Wildlife decreased their foraging time while they increased vigilance behavior when livestock were present; however, more studies are still for a wider conclusion.","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In African savannas, and many other rangelands around the world, wildlife presently find themselves interacting with livestock. Many studies have been conducted on vigilance behaviour in response to presence of predators on foraging grounds, but few scientists have included the presence of livestock and how this affects vigilance when foraging together with wild herbivores. As Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) is an important example of wildlife grazing together with livestock, this phenomenon must be understood to achieve a sustainable land use management plan, particularly in Ngorongoro Conservation Area and in other protected areas. Behavioral observations of wildlife and livestock species were conducted from a vehicle driving along transects within NCA. Once a group was sighted the vehicle was stopped and sighting information recorded. Four species of wild herbivores including plains zebra (Equus burchelli), Thomson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsonii), Grant’s gazelle (Gazella granti) and Wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) were studied together with the following livestock species including cattle (Bos taurus), goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) and sheep (Ovis aries), in different seasons. 158 groups were recorded. In dry season 47 non –mixed groups (without livestock) and 30 mixed groups (with livestock) were recorded, while, during wet season 49 non -mixed groups and 32 mixed groups were recorded. Behavior was classified as feeding, grooming, laying down, ruminating, grooming, moving, and looking with head up (vigilance) with the use of the focal animal sampling method. Wildlife decreased their foraging time while they increased vigilance behavior when livestock were present; however, more studies are still for a wider conclusion.
野生草食动物有无牲畜觅食时的警觉行为
在非洲的热带稀树草原,以及世界上许多其他的牧场,野生动物目前发现自己与牲畜相互作用。许多研究都是针对捕食者出现在觅食地时的警觉行为进行的,但很少有科学家把牲畜的存在以及牲畜与野生食草动物一起觅食时对警觉的影响纳入研究范围。由于恩戈罗恩戈罗保护区(NCA)是野生动物与牲畜一起放牧的一个重要例子,必须了解这一现象,以实现可持续的土地利用管理计划,特别是在恩戈罗恩戈罗保护区和其他保护区。对野生动物和牲畜的行为进行了观察,车辆沿着NCA内的横断面行驶。一旦发现一群人,车辆就会停下来,并记录下发现的信息。对平原斑马(Equus burchelli)、汤姆氏瞪羚(Gazella thomsonii)、格兰氏瞪羚(Gazella granti)和角马(Connochaetes taurinus) 4种野生食草动物以及牛(Bos taurus)、山羊(Capra aegagrus hircus)和绵羊(Ovis aries)等家畜在不同季节进行了研究。共记录158组。旱季记录47个非混合组(不饲养牲畜)和30个混合组(饲养牲畜),雨季记录49个非混合组和32个混合组。采用焦点动物取样法,将其行为分类为进食、梳理、躺卧、反刍、梳理、移动和抬头看(警惕)。当有牲畜存在时,野生动物减少了觅食时间,同时增加了警惕行为;然而,还需要更多的研究来得出更广泛的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信