Injusticia testimonial utilizada como arma

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY

Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.5209/ltdl.76462

Manuel Almagro, Javier Osorio, Neftalí Villanueva

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Las herramientas teóricas destinadas a señalar las injusticias que sufren ciertos grupos socialmente oprimidos pueden acabar siendo utilizadas con propósitos completamente opuestos a los iniciales. Modificar el alcance de una herramienta teórica no es necesariamente problemático: la popularización de un concepto abre las puertas a que se utilice estratégicamente para diferentes fines. La tesis que defendemos en este artículo es que algunos personajes públicos cultivan una imagen particular de sí mismos que parece satisfacer los requisitos de la noción de injusticia testimonial y utilizan esta situación como medio para obtener beneficio político de ella. Más concretamente, estos personajes públicos se benefician de esta condición para generar situaciones de desacuerdos cruzados, que están estrechamente relacionados con el aumento de la polarización.

查看原文本刊更多论文

被用作武器的证词不公正

旨在指出某些社会受压迫群体所遭受的不公正待遇的理论工具最终可能被用于与最初的目的完全相反的目的。改变理论工具的范围不一定是有问题的:一个概念的普及打开了一扇门，它可以战略性地用于不同的目的。我们在本文中捍卫的论点是，一些公众人物培养了一种特定的自我形象，这种形象似乎符合见证不公正的概念的要求，并利用这种情况作为一种手段，从中获得政治利益。更具体地说，这些公众人物受益于这种情况，产生了交叉分歧的情况，这与日益加剧的两极分化密切相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍： The scientific scope of Las Torres de Lucca (International Journal of Political Philosophy) will be to comprehend the characteristics of political philosophy, in line with the interdisciplinary character that has operated in this field during the last several years. We welcome contributions from the areas traditionally linked directly to political philosophy (moral philosophy, philosophy of law, political theory), as well as from those that have been incorporated up to the present day (political economy, philosophy of history, psychology, neurophysiology and, to a lesser extent, other sciences) as long as their scope is focused on the treatment of public affairs and sheds light on contemporary political reflections. In the same way, the reference to classic problems should be brought to bear on contemporary questions. The journal does not commit itself to any school of thought, style or ideology. However, we do commit ourselves to argumentative rigor and expositive clarity. Thus, the new publication is directed towards the academic environment and designed for the specialized reader; but the publication also aspires to awake interest in the reader who is not technically formed in these disciplines, but is interested by the public questions that inevitably affect him or her. We expect that the scope of the journal will be international. Thus, articles will be published in Spanish and English, and original articles in French, Portuguese, Italian, or German will be accepted as exceptions (depending on their quality and relevance), translated into Spanish and published in a bilingual format. We are particularly interested in covering the Spanish/Latin American realm, particularly lacking in specialized publications of this type. With this in mind, we count on experts from the distinct countries included in this geographic area.