Effect of different mechanical surface treatments on flexural strength of repaired denture base

Q4 Dentistry
H. Asli, S. Rahimabadi, Navid Belyani, Marzieh Neshandar Asli, M. Falahchai
{"title":"Effect of different mechanical surface treatments on flexural strength of repaired denture base","authors":"H. Asli, S. Rahimabadi, Navid Belyani, Marzieh Neshandar Asli, M. Falahchai","doi":"10.17126/joralres.2022.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess the effect of different mechanical surface treatments on flexural strength of repaired denture base. Material and Methods: Sixty bar-shaped specimens of heat-polymerized acrylic resin were fabricated, and divided into six groups (n=10). All specimens, except the positive control group (group PC), were sectioned into halves to create a 1-mm clearance. A negative control group with no surface treatment (group NC) was also considered. Other groups underwent different surface treatments: group Laser; treated with erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, group APA; airborne-particle abrasion (APA), group APA plus Laser; a combination of laser and APA, and group Bur; bur grinding. After measuring surface roughness (Ra) with a profilometer, all sectioned specimens were repaired by auto-polymerizing acrylic resin, and thermocycled afterward. Three-point bending test was performed by a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). Results: The mean surface roughness of all experimental groups were significantly higher than that of group NC (p<0.05). The mean flexural strength of all groups was significantly lower than that of group PC (p<0.05). Group B had significantly higher flexural strength than the other surface-treated groups (p<0.05). Group Laser had significantly higher flexural strength than groups APA (p=0.043) and APA plus Laser (p=0.023). No significant difference was found between groups APA and APA plus Laser (p=0.684). Conclusion: All surface treatments increased the surface roughness and flexural strength compared with the untreated group. The highest flexural strength was observed in specimens treated by bur grinding and then laser, however, it was still significantly lower than intact specimens.","PeriodicalId":16625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2022.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the effect of different mechanical surface treatments on flexural strength of repaired denture base. Material and Methods: Sixty bar-shaped specimens of heat-polymerized acrylic resin were fabricated, and divided into six groups (n=10). All specimens, except the positive control group (group PC), were sectioned into halves to create a 1-mm clearance. A negative control group with no surface treatment (group NC) was also considered. Other groups underwent different surface treatments: group Laser; treated with erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, group APA; airborne-particle abrasion (APA), group APA plus Laser; a combination of laser and APA, and group Bur; bur grinding. After measuring surface roughness (Ra) with a profilometer, all sectioned specimens were repaired by auto-polymerizing acrylic resin, and thermocycled afterward. Three-point bending test was performed by a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). Results: The mean surface roughness of all experimental groups were significantly higher than that of group NC (p<0.05). The mean flexural strength of all groups was significantly lower than that of group PC (p<0.05). Group B had significantly higher flexural strength than the other surface-treated groups (p<0.05). Group Laser had significantly higher flexural strength than groups APA (p=0.043) and APA plus Laser (p=0.023). No significant difference was found between groups APA and APA plus Laser (p=0.684). Conclusion: All surface treatments increased the surface roughness and flexural strength compared with the untreated group. The highest flexural strength was observed in specimens treated by bur grinding and then laser, however, it was still significantly lower than intact specimens.
不同机械表面处理对修复义齿基托抗弯强度的影响
目的:探讨不同机械表面处理对义齿基托抗弯强度的影响。材料与方法:制作热聚合丙烯酸树脂棒状试样60个,分为6组(n=10)。除阳性对照组(PC组)外,所有标本均切成两半,留出1mm间隙。另设不作表面处理的阴性对照组(NC组)。其他各组进行不同的表面处理:激光组;铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光处理,APA组;空气颗粒磨损(APA), APA +激光组;激光和APA的组合,以及Bur组;钻磨。用轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度(Ra)后,所有切片标本用自动聚合丙烯酸树脂修复,然后进行热循环。采用万能试验机进行三点弯曲试验。对数据进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。结果:各实验组的平均表面粗糙度均显著高于NC组(p<0.05)。各组平均抗弯强度均显著低于PC组(p<0.05)。B组小鼠抗弯强度显著高于其他表面处理组(p<0.05)。激光组的抗弯强度显著高于APA组(p=0.043)和APA + Laser组(p=0.023)。APA组与APA + Laser组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.684)。结论:与未处理组相比,所有表面处理均增加了表面粗糙度和抗弯强度。先磨后激光处理的试件抗弯强度最高,但仍明显低于未加工的试件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Research
Journal of Oral Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Research which is published every two month, is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge in oral and craniofacial sciences, including: oral surgery and medicine and rehabilitation, craniofacial surgery, dentistry, orofacial pain and motor disorders, head and neck surgery, speech and swallowing disorders, and other related disciplines. Journal of Oral Research publishes original research articles and brief communications, systematic reviews, study protocols, research hypotheses, reports of cases, comments and perspectives. Indexed by Scopus, DOAJ, LILACS, Latindex, IMBIOMED, DIALNET,REDIB and Google Scholar. Journal of Oral Research is a member of COPE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信