Exploring tuition fees as a policy instrument of internationalisation in a welfare state – the case of Sweden

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Lundin, Lars Geschwind
{"title":"Exploring tuition fees as a policy instrument of internationalisation in a welfare state – the case of Sweden","authors":"H. Lundin, Lars Geschwind","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2021.1994867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article sheds light on some challenges that internationalisation raises for policymakers regarding public funding of higher education in a welfare state by examining policy logics for introducing tuition fees for international students in Sweden 2011. Using thematic analysis of documents related to the Swedish reform, we identify how an increasing number of international students was the perceived policy problem, threatening national students’ access to free higher education. Policy objectives included sharing the cost of internationalisation but also enabling control of cost and influx of international students, enhancing quality and strengthening national branding. Many of these objectives concur with more established understandings on why policymakers turn to the market according to a more neo-liberal ‘market’ logic. However, a policy mix of tuition fees and scholarships enabled a governance model of control, which more relates to a ‘welfare’ logic. Likewise, the policy problem indicates that a search for profit and revenue cannot simply explain tuition fee reforms for international students. By discussing how underlying normative assumptions at the policy formulation stage contrast reality ten years after the reform, it appears that revenue from the global market has been more significant for Swedish policymakers than the rhetoric suggests.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"20 1","pages":"102 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1994867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article sheds light on some challenges that internationalisation raises for policymakers regarding public funding of higher education in a welfare state by examining policy logics for introducing tuition fees for international students in Sweden 2011. Using thematic analysis of documents related to the Swedish reform, we identify how an increasing number of international students was the perceived policy problem, threatening national students’ access to free higher education. Policy objectives included sharing the cost of internationalisation but also enabling control of cost and influx of international students, enhancing quality and strengthening national branding. Many of these objectives concur with more established understandings on why policymakers turn to the market according to a more neo-liberal ‘market’ logic. However, a policy mix of tuition fees and scholarships enabled a governance model of control, which more relates to a ‘welfare’ logic. Likewise, the policy problem indicates that a search for profit and revenue cannot simply explain tuition fee reforms for international students. By discussing how underlying normative assumptions at the policy formulation stage contrast reality ten years after the reform, it appears that revenue from the global market has been more significant for Swedish policymakers than the rhetoric suggests.
探索学费作为福利国家国际化的政策工具——以瑞典为例
本文通过考察2011年瑞典引入国际学生学费的政策逻辑,揭示了在福利国家中,国际化给决策者在高等教育公共资金方面带来的一些挑战。通过对瑞典改革相关文件的专题分析,我们发现越来越多的国际学生是如何被视为政策问题的,威胁到本国学生获得免费高等教育的机会。政策目标包括分担国际化的成本,但也包括控制成本和国际学生的涌入,提高质量和加强国家品牌。这些目标中的许多与更成熟的理解一致,即为什么政策制定者根据更新自由主义的“市场”逻辑转向市场。然而,学费和奖学金的政策组合实现了一种控制的治理模式,这与“福利”逻辑更相关。同样,政策问题表明,对利润和收入的追求不能简单地解释国际学生的学费改革。通过讨论政策制定阶段的基本规范假设如何与改革十年后的现实形成对比,来自全球市场的收入对瑞典政策制定者来说似乎比口头上所说的更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信