Technical Note: Optimal Market Integration Decisions by Policy Makers: Modeling and Analysis of Agriculture Market Data

Shivam Gupta, S. Bansal
{"title":"Technical Note: Optimal Market Integration Decisions by Policy Makers: Modeling and Analysis of Agriculture Market Data","authors":"Shivam Gupta, S. Bansal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3628930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy-makers often seek to integrate markets as a way to maximize social welfare. Prior research has examined the effect of market integration on social welfare (surplus) only at two extremes -- when the markets are fully integrated, or, when they are fully isolated. But there is scarce information available for (i) how large the social surplus is at intermediate levels of market integration, and (ii) whether social surplus is maximized when markets are fully integrated, or fully isolated, or partially integrated. In this note, we consider the spectrum of all possible integration policies spanning from full isolation to complete integration, and characterize the socially-optimal market integration, under general demands. Our setting consists of a policy-maker, a price-setting firm, and a continuum of consumers in two markets. We identify market conditions under which social surplus is indeed maximized at partial market-integration. For the linear price-responsive demand model that is used extensively in the operations management literature, these conditions are identified as thresholds on (i) the relative size of the markets being integrated, and, (ii) the relative price-sensitivity of consumers in these markets. We then apply the model to the commercial seed market in European Union (EU). We first identify the optimal level of market integration between the markets for seed corn in various countries in EU. Subsequent analysis shows that socially-optimal market integration for these countries provides a further improvement in the social surplus for EU by 2.80%, relative to complete integration. Overall, our results show that policy-makers should exercise caution in determining the extent to which markets are integrated.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3628930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Policy-makers often seek to integrate markets as a way to maximize social welfare. Prior research has examined the effect of market integration on social welfare (surplus) only at two extremes -- when the markets are fully integrated, or, when they are fully isolated. But there is scarce information available for (i) how large the social surplus is at intermediate levels of market integration, and (ii) whether social surplus is maximized when markets are fully integrated, or fully isolated, or partially integrated. In this note, we consider the spectrum of all possible integration policies spanning from full isolation to complete integration, and characterize the socially-optimal market integration, under general demands. Our setting consists of a policy-maker, a price-setting firm, and a continuum of consumers in two markets. We identify market conditions under which social surplus is indeed maximized at partial market-integration. For the linear price-responsive demand model that is used extensively in the operations management literature, these conditions are identified as thresholds on (i) the relative size of the markets being integrated, and, (ii) the relative price-sensitivity of consumers in these markets. We then apply the model to the commercial seed market in European Union (EU). We first identify the optimal level of market integration between the markets for seed corn in various countries in EU. Subsequent analysis shows that socially-optimal market integration for these countries provides a further improvement in the social surplus for EU by 2.80%, relative to complete integration. Overall, our results show that policy-makers should exercise caution in determining the extent to which markets are integrated.
技术说明:政策制定者的最优市场整合决策:农业市场数据的建模与分析
政策制定者经常寻求整合市场,作为实现社会福利最大化的一种方式。先前的研究只在两个极端情况下考察了市场一体化对社会福利(盈余)的影响——当市场完全一体化时,或者当市场完全隔离时。但是,对于(1)在市场一体化的中间水平上社会剩余有多大,以及(2)当市场完全一体化、完全孤立或部分一体化时,社会剩余是否最大化,可用的信息很少。在本文中,我们考虑了从完全隔离到完全一体化的所有可能的一体化政策的范围,并描述了一般需求下社会最优市场一体化的特征。我们的环境由一个政策制定者、一个定价公司和两个市场的连续消费者组成。我们确定了在部分市场一体化下社会剩余确实最大化的市场条件。对于在运营管理文献中广泛使用的线性价格响应需求模型,这些条件被确定为(i)正在整合的市场的相对规模,以及(ii)这些市场中消费者的相对价格敏感性的阈值。然后我们将该模型应用于欧盟(EU)的商业种子市场。我们首先确定了欧盟各国种子玉米市场之间的最佳市场整合水平。随后的分析表明,相对于完全一体化,这些国家的社会最优市场一体化使欧盟的社会剩余进一步提高了2.80%。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,政策制定者在确定市场整合程度时应谨慎行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信