A rapid review to determine the suicide risk of separated men and the effectiveness of targeted suicide prevention interventions.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
K. King, K. Krysińska, Angela Nicholas
{"title":"A rapid review to determine the suicide risk of separated men and the effectiveness of targeted suicide prevention interventions.","authors":"K. King, K. Krysińska, Angela Nicholas","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2021.1977666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This rapid review aimed to understand the rates of suicidal ideation and behaviours in men who are separated from intimate relationships, the co-occurrence of risk factors, and the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for them in order to inform future suicide prevention efforts. Method: The review method followed a streamlined systematic review process which facilitates an expedited review of the evidence related to the review questions. We searched three academic databases (Cochrane, Medline and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2019 in English using keywords related to men who are separated from an intimate relationship; suicidal thoughts, attempts and deaths; suicide rates; and suicide prevention interventions. Results: Four systematic reviews and 22 papers featuring primary studies were included in the review relating to suicide rates and risk. No papers were identified relating to the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for this group. The evidence base was rated as good. The findings suggest that men who are separated from an intimate relationship are at higher risk of suicide. Discussion: The review identified an increased risk of suicide among men who are separated, but no evidence about the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for them. More work is needed to unpack the interplay between personal and sociodemographic factors and the risk of suicide for separated men in order to inform suicide prevention efforts with these men.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"154 1","pages":"184 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.1977666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This rapid review aimed to understand the rates of suicidal ideation and behaviours in men who are separated from intimate relationships, the co-occurrence of risk factors, and the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for them in order to inform future suicide prevention efforts. Method: The review method followed a streamlined systematic review process which facilitates an expedited review of the evidence related to the review questions. We searched three academic databases (Cochrane, Medline and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2019 in English using keywords related to men who are separated from an intimate relationship; suicidal thoughts, attempts and deaths; suicide rates; and suicide prevention interventions. Results: Four systematic reviews and 22 papers featuring primary studies were included in the review relating to suicide rates and risk. No papers were identified relating to the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for this group. The evidence base was rated as good. The findings suggest that men who are separated from an intimate relationship are at higher risk of suicide. Discussion: The review identified an increased risk of suicide among men who are separated, but no evidence about the effectiveness of suicide prevention interventions for them. More work is needed to unpack the interplay between personal and sociodemographic factors and the risk of suicide for separated men in order to inform suicide prevention efforts with these men.
快速回顾以确定分居男性的自杀风险和有针对性的自杀预防干预措施的有效性。
摘要目的:本研究旨在了解与亲密关系分离的男性自杀意念和行为的发生率、危险因素的共现情况,以及自杀预防干预措施的有效性,为未来的自杀预防工作提供依据。方法:审查方法遵循一个简化的系统审查过程,便于对审查问题相关的证据进行快速审查。我们检索了三个学术数据库(Cochrane、Medline和PsycINFO),检索了2010年至2019年期间发表的同行评议的英文文章,关键词是与亲密关系分离的男性;自杀念头、企图和死亡;自杀率;自杀预防干预。结果:四篇系统综述和22篇主要研究论文纳入了与自杀率和风险相关的综述。没有关于自杀预防干预对这一群体有效性的论文被确认。证据基础被评为良好。研究结果表明,与亲密关系分离的男性自杀的风险更高。讨论:该综述确定了分居男性的自杀风险增加,但没有证据表明自杀预防干预对他们有效。需要更多的工作来揭示个人和社会人口因素与分居男性自杀风险之间的相互作用,以便为这些男性的自杀预防工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信