[Ulcerative colitis].

J. Gasiński, S. Kuśmierski, B. Kubicki
{"title":"[Ulcerative colitis].","authors":"J. Gasiński, S. Kuśmierski, B. Kubicki","doi":"10.1097/00000446-199712000-00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T H E HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT of psychosomatic investigation has dramatized both the possibilities and the limitations of the psychosomatic method. Although an exhaustive review of the literature lies beyond the scope of our presentation, a brief survey of the changing currents in psychosomatic theory will be helpful. Three more or less distinct concepts have guided workers in the field of psychosomatic medicine. The first and earliest attempted to treat the vegetative disorders as essentially hysterical conversion phenomena. Thus, Ferenczi,discussing diarrhea, wrote: \"The hysterics show us clearly that any point in the large bowel can act as a sphincter, and is capable of finely localized contractions, making it possible to retain a fecal mass or a gas bubble at some point and to compress, so to say, shape it; this may be accompanied by painful paresthesia. The notions that specifically influence these innervations belong to a complex ruled by ideas of possession, retention, and unwillingness to give up. We find on analysis that the neurotic from whom something of worth has been taken against his will piles up a possession in his bowels for a considerable period as a substitute; that he announces with an unusually copious stool his intention of communicating long-withheld confessions to the analyst.\"","PeriodicalId":20296,"journal":{"name":"Polski tygodnik lekarski","volume":"99 1","pages":"1657-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski tygodnik lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-199712000-00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T H E HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT of psychosomatic investigation has dramatized both the possibilities and the limitations of the psychosomatic method. Although an exhaustive review of the literature lies beyond the scope of our presentation, a brief survey of the changing currents in psychosomatic theory will be helpful. Three more or less distinct concepts have guided workers in the field of psychosomatic medicine. The first and earliest attempted to treat the vegetative disorders as essentially hysterical conversion phenomena. Thus, Ferenczi,discussing diarrhea, wrote: "The hysterics show us clearly that any point in the large bowel can act as a sphincter, and is capable of finely localized contractions, making it possible to retain a fecal mass or a gas bubble at some point and to compress, so to say, shape it; this may be accompanied by painful paresthesia. The notions that specifically influence these innervations belong to a complex ruled by ideas of possession, retention, and unwillingness to give up. We find on analysis that the neurotic from whom something of worth has been taken against his will piles up a possession in his bowels for a considerable period as a substitute; that he announces with an unusually copious stool his intention of communicating long-withheld confessions to the analyst."
心身研究的历史发展戏剧化了心身方法的可能性和局限性。虽然对文献的详尽回顾超出了我们的演讲范围,但对心身理论的变化趋势的简要调查将有所帮助。三个或多或少不同的概念指导着心身医学领域的工作者。第一个也是最早的尝试将植物性疾病本质上视为歇斯底里的转化现象。因此,Ferenczi在讨论腹泻时写道:“歇斯底里症清楚地告诉我们,大肠的任何一点都可以充当括约肌,并且能够精细地定位收缩,从而可以在某些点保留粪便团块或气泡,并压缩,可以说,塑造它;这可能伴有疼痛的感觉异常。具体影响这些神经支配的观念属于一种由占有、保留和不愿放弃等观念支配的情结。我们在分析中发现,一个神经症患者,如果有人违背他的意愿从他那里拿走了某种有价值的东西,他就会在相当长的一段时间内,在他的肠子里堆积一种东西作为替代品;他以一种异乎寻常的丰富的粪便宣布他打算向分析师传达长期隐瞒的供词。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信