Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies

Ron Latimer, Joe Rohrbacher, Vivi Nguyen, W. Khunjar, S. Jeyanayagam
{"title":"Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies","authors":"Ron Latimer, Joe Rohrbacher, Vivi Nguyen, W. Khunjar, S. Jeyanayagam","doi":"10.2166/9781780407920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extractive nutrient recovery, defined as the production of chemical nutrient products devoid of significant organic matter, represents a complementary strategy for managing nutrients in multiple waste streams. In this option, energy and resources are used to accumulate and produce a chemical nutrient product that is recyclable and has a resale value that could potentially help offset operating costs while reducing nutrient production from raw materials for agricultural or other uses.\n\nThis report presents a compilation of case studies of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) at various stages of implementation of extractive nutrient recovery technologies in the form of struvite crystallization. Of the 20 WRRFs identified in this report, six have implemented or are implementing a struvite crystallization facility and seven have performed desktop and/or pilot evaluations. Data from these 13 utilities were used to develop the Tool for Evaluating Resource Recovery-Phosphorus (TERRY – Phosphorus), which was used to perform a conceptual level evaluation of implementing struvite recovery at seven other WRRFs.\n\nData from the full-scale WRRFs that have implemented struvite recovery indicate that sidestream soluble phosphorus removals ranged from 80 to 90%, while ammonia removal ranged from 7 to 30%. Struvite production ranged from 64 to 421 metric tonnes per year and was found to be dependent on the site-specific conditions and technology employed. Drivers for implementing nutrient recovery included reduction in supplemental carbon requirements for nitrogen removal, reduction in aeration requirements, reduction in biosolids production versus conventional treatment alternatives, reduction in costs associated with mitigating nuisance precipitate formation, benefits to sludge dewaterability, and benefits associated with manipulating the N and P content of the biosolids. Quantifying the economic and non-economic benefits of these drivers together with site-specific factors can help drive the implementation of resource recovery systems at full-scale WRRFs.\n\nThis title belongs to WERF Research Report Series \n\nISBN: 9781780407920 (eBook)","PeriodicalId":23698,"journal":{"name":"Water intelligence online","volume":"136 1","pages":"9781780407920-9781780407920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water intelligence online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780407920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Extractive nutrient recovery, defined as the production of chemical nutrient products devoid of significant organic matter, represents a complementary strategy for managing nutrients in multiple waste streams. In this option, energy and resources are used to accumulate and produce a chemical nutrient product that is recyclable and has a resale value that could potentially help offset operating costs while reducing nutrient production from raw materials for agricultural or other uses. This report presents a compilation of case studies of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) at various stages of implementation of extractive nutrient recovery technologies in the form of struvite crystallization. Of the 20 WRRFs identified in this report, six have implemented or are implementing a struvite crystallization facility and seven have performed desktop and/or pilot evaluations. Data from these 13 utilities were used to develop the Tool for Evaluating Resource Recovery-Phosphorus (TERRY – Phosphorus), which was used to perform a conceptual level evaluation of implementing struvite recovery at seven other WRRFs. Data from the full-scale WRRFs that have implemented struvite recovery indicate that sidestream soluble phosphorus removals ranged from 80 to 90%, while ammonia removal ranged from 7 to 30%. Struvite production ranged from 64 to 421 metric tonnes per year and was found to be dependent on the site-specific conditions and technology employed. Drivers for implementing nutrient recovery included reduction in supplemental carbon requirements for nitrogen removal, reduction in aeration requirements, reduction in biosolids production versus conventional treatment alternatives, reduction in costs associated with mitigating nuisance precipitate formation, benefits to sludge dewaterability, and benefits associated with manipulating the N and P content of the biosolids. Quantifying the economic and non-economic benefits of these drivers together with site-specific factors can help drive the implementation of resource recovery systems at full-scale WRRFs. This title belongs to WERF Research Report Series ISBN: 9781780407920 (eBook)
迈向可再生的未来:评估资源回收作为一种可行的治疗选择:采用萃取营养回收技术的设施案例研究
萃取养分回收被定义为生产不含重要有机物的化学养分产品,是管理多种废物流中的养分的一种补充策略。在这个方案中,能源和资源被用来积累和生产一种可回收的化学营养产品,这种产品具有转售价值,可以潜在地帮助抵消运营成本,同时减少农业或其他用途原料的营养生产。本报告汇编了水资源回收设施在实施鸟粪石结晶形式的提取营养物回收技术的不同阶段的案例研究。在本报告确定的20个自然资源基金中,有6个已执行或正在执行鸟粪石结晶设施,7个已进行桌面评价和(或)试点评价。来自这13个公用设施的数据被用于开发评估资源回收-磷的工具(TERRY -磷),该工具被用于对其他7个WRRFs实施鸟粪石回收的概念水平进行评估。采用鸟粪石回收的全尺寸wrrf的数据表明,侧流可溶性磷的去除率在80%到90%之间,而氨的去除率在7%到30%之间。鸟粪石的年产量从64公吨到421公吨不等,这取决于具体的场地条件和所采用的技术。实施养分回收的驱动因素包括减少氮去除所需的补充碳,减少曝气要求,减少生物固体的产量,减少与传统处理方案相关的成本,减少与减轻有害沉淀形成相关的成本,污泥脱水性的好处,以及与控制生物固体的N和P含量相关的好处。量化这些驱动因素的经济和非经济效益以及特定地点的因素可以帮助推动在全面的自然资源保护区实施资源回收系统。本文归属于WERF研究报告丛书ISBN: 9781780407920(电子书)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信