Snapshot-free, transparent, and robust memory reclamation for lock-free data structures

R. Nikolaev, B. Ravindran
{"title":"Snapshot-free, transparent, and robust memory reclamation for lock-free data structures","authors":"R. Nikolaev, B. Ravindran","doi":"10.1145/3453483.3454090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a family of safe memory reclamation schemes, Hyaline, which are fast, scalable, and transparent to the underlying lock-free data structures. Hyaline is based on reference counting -- considered impractical for memory reclamation in the past due to high overheads. Hyaline uses reference counters only during reclamation, but not while accessing individual objects, which reduces overheads for object accesses. Since with reference counters, an arbitrary thread ends up freeing memory, Hyaline's reclamation workload is (almost) balanced across all threads, unlike most prior reclamation schemes such as epoch-based reclamation (EBR) or hazard pointers (HP). Hyaline often yields (excellent) EBR-grade performance with (good) HP-grade memory efficiency, which is a challenging trade-off with all existing schemes. Hyaline schemes offer: (i) high performance; (ii) good memory efficiency; (iii) robustness: bounding memory usage even in the presence of stalled threads, a well-known problem with EBR; (iv) transparency: supporting virtually unbounded number of threads (or concurrent entities) that can be created and deleted dynamically, and effortlessly join existent workload; (v) autonomy: avoiding special OS mechanisms and being non-intrusive to runtime or compiler environments; (vi) simplicity: enabling easy integration into unmanaged C/C++ code; and (vii) generality: supporting many data structures. All existing schemes lack one or more properties. We have implemented and tested Hyaline on x86(-64), ARM32/64, PowerPC, and MIPS. The general approach requires LL/SC or double-width CAS, while a specialized version also works with single-width CAS. Our evaluation reveals that Hyaline's throughput is very high -- it steadily outperforms EBR by 10% in one test and yields 2x gains in oversubscribed scenarios. Hyaline's superior memory efficiency is especially evident in read-dominated workloads.","PeriodicalId":20557,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3453483.3454090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We present a family of safe memory reclamation schemes, Hyaline, which are fast, scalable, and transparent to the underlying lock-free data structures. Hyaline is based on reference counting -- considered impractical for memory reclamation in the past due to high overheads. Hyaline uses reference counters only during reclamation, but not while accessing individual objects, which reduces overheads for object accesses. Since with reference counters, an arbitrary thread ends up freeing memory, Hyaline's reclamation workload is (almost) balanced across all threads, unlike most prior reclamation schemes such as epoch-based reclamation (EBR) or hazard pointers (HP). Hyaline often yields (excellent) EBR-grade performance with (good) HP-grade memory efficiency, which is a challenging trade-off with all existing schemes. Hyaline schemes offer: (i) high performance; (ii) good memory efficiency; (iii) robustness: bounding memory usage even in the presence of stalled threads, a well-known problem with EBR; (iv) transparency: supporting virtually unbounded number of threads (or concurrent entities) that can be created and deleted dynamically, and effortlessly join existent workload; (v) autonomy: avoiding special OS mechanisms and being non-intrusive to runtime or compiler environments; (vi) simplicity: enabling easy integration into unmanaged C/C++ code; and (vii) generality: supporting many data structures. All existing schemes lack one or more properties. We have implemented and tested Hyaline on x86(-64), ARM32/64, PowerPC, and MIPS. The general approach requires LL/SC or double-width CAS, while a specialized version also works with single-width CAS. Our evaluation reveals that Hyaline's throughput is very high -- it steadily outperforms EBR by 10% in one test and yields 2x gains in oversubscribed scenarios. Hyaline's superior memory efficiency is especially evident in read-dominated workloads.
无锁数据结构的无快照、透明和健壮的内存回收
我们提出了一系列安全的内存回收方案,Hyaline,它快速,可扩展,并且对底层无锁数据结构透明。Hyaline基于引用计数——由于开销大,在过去被认为不适合内存回收。Hyaline仅在回收期间使用引用计数器,而不是在访问单个对象时使用,这减少了对象访问的开销。由于使用引用计数器,任意线程最终都会释放内存,因此Hyaline的回收工作负载(几乎)在所有线程之间平衡,这与大多数先前的回收方案(如基于epoch的回收(EBR)或危险指针(HP))不同。Hyaline通常会产生(优秀的)ebr级性能和(良好的)hp级内存效率,这对于所有现有方案来说都是一个具有挑战性的权衡。透明方案提供:(i)高性能;(ii)良好的记忆效率;(iii)健壮性:即使在存在线程停滞的情况下,也可以限制内存使用,这是EBR的一个众所周知的问题;(iv)透明度:支持几乎无限数量的线程(或并发实体),可以动态创建和删除,毫不费力地加入现有的工作负载;(v)自主性:避免特殊的操作系统机制,不干扰运行时或编译器环境;(vi)简单性:易于集成到非托管C/ c++代码中;(vii)通用性:支持多种数据结构。所有现有的方案都缺少一个或多个属性。我们已经在x86(-64)、ARM32/64、PowerPC和MIPS上实现和测试了Hyaline。一般方法需要LL/SC或双宽度CAS,而专用版本也可以使用单宽度CAS。我们的评估显示,Hyaline的吞吐量非常高——在一次测试中,它的性能稳定地超过了EBR 10%,并且在超额订阅的情况下获得了2倍的收益。在以读为主的工作负载中,Hyaline优越的内存效率尤其明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信