Diagnóstico genético pre-implantacional no invasivo como método de detección de aneuploidías embrionarias: una revisión sistemática

Abraham Zavala-Garcia , Juan M. Moreno-Garcia
{"title":"Diagnóstico genético pre-implantacional no invasivo como método de detección de aneuploidías embrionarias: una revisión sistemática","authors":"Abraham Zavala-Garcia ,&nbsp;Juan M. Moreno-Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The primary aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the available current scientific evidence on non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) in regards to cell free DNA (cf-DNA) detection in spent culture media (SCM), cf-DNA amplification, and concordance rates against conventional PGT-A.</p></div><div><h3>Search Methods</h3><p>We performed an exhaustive systematic search through major databases for original experimental research, from a period of conception to March 2020, using a combination of the following search words: blastocele/blastoceol fluid, blastoscentesis, cell-free DNA embryo, embryo aneuploidy preimplantation, embryo biopsy preimplantation, noninvasive pgt, preimplantation diagnosis, spent embryo culture media, and trophoectoderm (TE) biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our search yielded 26 studies for a qualitative and 15 for quantitative analysis. Our main results report that cf-DNA is detectable in SCM in 100% of ART (IVF/ICSI) treatments at a rate of 44.4-100% per sample. The average concentration of cf-DNA is 37.42 ng/μL. General concordance rates between cf-DNA and TE biopsy range from 54.9 to 100% (average 78.32% ± 14.55). We found important discrepancies between niPGT-A methodologies carried out by different ART centers, such as culture volume, SCM storage temperature, women embryo donors' age, embryo quality, use of negative/sham controls, time of SCM collection, and genetic analysis platforms/systems.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are many ways in which niPGT-A may be optimized, according to current scientific evidence. However, there are many important questions that remain unanswered in order to standardize niPGT-A as routine practice in ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932021000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The primary aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the available current scientific evidence on non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) in regards to cell free DNA (cf-DNA) detection in spent culture media (SCM), cf-DNA amplification, and concordance rates against conventional PGT-A.

Search Methods

We performed an exhaustive systematic search through major databases for original experimental research, from a period of conception to March 2020, using a combination of the following search words: blastocele/blastoceol fluid, blastoscentesis, cell-free DNA embryo, embryo aneuploidy preimplantation, embryo biopsy preimplantation, noninvasive pgt, preimplantation diagnosis, spent embryo culture media, and trophoectoderm (TE) biopsy.

Results

Our search yielded 26 studies for a qualitative and 15 for quantitative analysis. Our main results report that cf-DNA is detectable in SCM in 100% of ART (IVF/ICSI) treatments at a rate of 44.4-100% per sample. The average concentration of cf-DNA is 37.42 ng/μL. General concordance rates between cf-DNA and TE biopsy range from 54.9 to 100% (average 78.32% ± 14.55). We found important discrepancies between niPGT-A methodologies carried out by different ART centers, such as culture volume, SCM storage temperature, women embryo donors' age, embryo quality, use of negative/sham controls, time of SCM collection, and genetic analysis platforms/systems.

Conclusions

There are many ways in which niPGT-A may be optimized, according to current scientific evidence. However, there are many important questions that remain unanswered in order to standardize niPGT-A as routine practice in ART.

植入前无创遗传诊断作为胚胎非整倍体检测方法:系统综述
本系统综述的主要目的是评估非侵入性PGT-A (niPGT-A)在废培养基(SCM)中游离细胞DNA (cf-DNA)检测、cf-DNA扩增和与传统PGT-A的一致性率方面的现有科学证据。检索方法:我们通过主要数据库对从受孕期到2020年3月的原始实验研究进行了全面的系统检索,检索词包括:囊胚/囊胚液、囊胚穿刺、无细胞DNA胚胎、胚胎非整倍体着床前、胚胎活检着床前、无创pgt、着床前诊断、废胚胎培养基和滋养外胚层(TE)活检。结果我们的搜索得到了26项定性分析和15项定量分析。我们的主要结果报告,在100%的ART (IVF/ICSI)治疗中,SCM中检测到cf-DNA,每个样本的检测率为44.4-100%。cf-DNA的平均浓度为37.42 ng/μL。cf-DNA与TE活检的一般符合率为54.9% ~ 100%(平均78.32% ± 14.55)。我们发现不同ART中心开展的niPGT-A方法之间存在重要差异,如培养体积、SCM储存温度、女性胚胎供体年龄、胚胎质量、阴性/假对照的使用、SCM收集时间和遗传分析平台/系统。结论根据现有的科学证据,有多种方法可以优化niPGT-A。然而,为了使niPGT-A作为抗逆转录病毒治疗的常规做法标准化,仍有许多重要问题有待解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信