A systematic review on career interventions for university students: Framework, effectiveness, and outcomes

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
J. Soares, C. Carvalho, Ana Daniela Silva
{"title":"A systematic review on career interventions for university students: Framework, effectiveness, and outcomes","authors":"J. Soares, C. Carvalho, Ana Daniela Silva","doi":"10.1177/10384162221100460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a systematic literature review about career interventions for university students exploring (1) which theoretical framework; (2) structure; (3) evaluation system; and (4) outcomes are reported. Fourteen keywords, five databases, and six eligibility criteria were defined. Among the 596 articles collected, 26 remained for meta-synthesis. Results indicated a predominance of (1) three theoretical frameworks, (2) group intervention modality, (3) pre-and post-test evaluation system, and (4) the positive development of skills in decision-making. Recommendations are presented to guide future research and practice in the field. For example, this study indicates the importance of providing updated information about the world of work within career interventions or educational programs.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"81 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162221100460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review about career interventions for university students exploring (1) which theoretical framework; (2) structure; (3) evaluation system; and (4) outcomes are reported. Fourteen keywords, five databases, and six eligibility criteria were defined. Among the 596 articles collected, 26 remained for meta-synthesis. Results indicated a predominance of (1) three theoretical frameworks, (2) group intervention modality, (3) pre-and post-test evaluation system, and (4) the positive development of skills in decision-making. Recommendations are presented to guide future research and practice in the field. For example, this study indicates the importance of providing updated information about the world of work within career interventions or educational programs.
大学生职业生涯干预的系统回顾:框架、有效性与结果
本研究对大学生职业生涯干预进行了系统的文献综述,探讨了(1)职业生涯干预的理论框架;(2)结构;(3)评价体系;(4)结果报告。共定义了14个关键词、5个数据库和6个入选标准。在收集到的596篇文献中,仍有26篇进行meta综合。结果显示:(1)三个理论框架,(2)群体干预模式,(3)测试前和测试后评价体系,(4)决策技能的积极发展。提出了指导该领域未来研究和实践的建议。例如,这项研究表明了在职业干预或教育计划中提供有关工作世界的最新信息的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信