The anti-nociceptive effect of BPC-157 on the incisional pain model in rats

Young-Hoon Jung, Haekyu Kim, Hyae-Jin Kim, Eunsoo Kim, Jiseok Baik, H. Kang
{"title":"The anti-nociceptive effect of BPC-157 on the incisional pain model in rats","authors":"Young-Hoon Jung, Haekyu Kim, Hyae-Jin Kim, Eunsoo Kim, Jiseok Baik, H. Kang","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The pentadecapeptide BPC-157 has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects on multiple target tissues and organs. Peptides have potent anti-inflammatory effects on periodontal tissues in rats with periodontitis. Few studies have investigated the effect of BPC-157 on pain after dental procedures or oral surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the antinociceptive effects of BPC-157 on postoperative incisional pain in rats. Methods Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: control (saline with the same volume), BPC10 (10 µg/kg of BPC-157), BPC20 (20 µg/kg of BPC-157), BPC40 (40 µg/kg of BPC-157), and morphine (5 mg/kg of morphine). A 1-cm longitudinal incision was made through the skin, fascia, and muscle of the plantar aspect of the hind paw in isoflurane-anesthetised rats. Withdrawal responses were measured using von Frey filaments at 0, 2, 6 h and 4, 7 d after incision. The formalin test was also performed to differentiate its anti-nociceptive effect from an inflammatory reaction or central sensitization. Pain behavior was quantified periodically in phases 1 and 2 by counting the number of flinches in the ipsilateral paw after injection with 30 µL of 5% formalin. Results The threshold of mechanical allodynia was significantly increased in the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups compared with that in the control group at 2 h. These increasing thresholds then returned to the levels of the control group. The BPC-157 group showed a much higher threshold at 4 days after incision than the control group. The thresholds of the BPC groups, except the morphine group, were normalized 7 days after incision. The flinching numbers of the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups were significantly decreased in phase 1, but there was no decrease in the BPC-157 groups except the morphine group in phase 2. Conclusions BPC-157 was effective only for a short period after incision. It was also effective during phase 1 but not during phase 2, as determined by the formalin test. BPC-157 might have a short antinociceptive effect, even though it has anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects.","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"97 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background The pentadecapeptide BPC-157 has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects on multiple target tissues and organs. Peptides have potent anti-inflammatory effects on periodontal tissues in rats with periodontitis. Few studies have investigated the effect of BPC-157 on pain after dental procedures or oral surgeries. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the antinociceptive effects of BPC-157 on postoperative incisional pain in rats. Methods Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: control (saline with the same volume), BPC10 (10 µg/kg of BPC-157), BPC20 (20 µg/kg of BPC-157), BPC40 (40 µg/kg of BPC-157), and morphine (5 mg/kg of morphine). A 1-cm longitudinal incision was made through the skin, fascia, and muscle of the plantar aspect of the hind paw in isoflurane-anesthetised rats. Withdrawal responses were measured using von Frey filaments at 0, 2, 6 h and 4, 7 d after incision. The formalin test was also performed to differentiate its anti-nociceptive effect from an inflammatory reaction or central sensitization. Pain behavior was quantified periodically in phases 1 and 2 by counting the number of flinches in the ipsilateral paw after injection with 30 µL of 5% formalin. Results The threshold of mechanical allodynia was significantly increased in the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups compared with that in the control group at 2 h. These increasing thresholds then returned to the levels of the control group. The BPC-157 group showed a much higher threshold at 4 days after incision than the control group. The thresholds of the BPC groups, except the morphine group, were normalized 7 days after incision. The flinching numbers of the BPC10, BPC20, BPC40 and morphine groups were significantly decreased in phase 1, but there was no decrease in the BPC-157 groups except the morphine group in phase 2. Conclusions BPC-157 was effective only for a short period after incision. It was also effective during phase 1 but not during phase 2, as determined by the formalin test. BPC-157 might have a short antinociceptive effect, even though it has anti-inflammatory and wound healing effects.
BPC-157对大鼠切口疼痛模型的抗伤害作用
研究表明,五肽BPC-157对多种靶组织和器官具有抗炎和伤口愈合作用。多肽对牙周炎大鼠牙周组织有明显的抗炎作用。很少有研究调查BPC-157对牙科手术或口腔手术后疼痛的影响。本研究旨在探讨BPC-157对大鼠术后切口疼痛的抗伤性作用。方法将sd - dawley大鼠随机分为5组:对照组(等量生理盐水)、BPC10组(10µg/kg BPC-157)、BPC20组(20µg/kg BPC-157)、BPC40组(40µg/kg BPC-157)、吗啡组(5 mg/kg吗啡)。异氟醚麻醉大鼠后爪足底侧皮肤、筋膜和肌肉纵切1 cm。分别于切口后0、2、6 h和4 7 d采用von Frey纤维测定戒断反应。还进行了福尔马林试验,以区分其抗伤害性作用与炎症反应或中枢致敏。在注射30µL 5%福尔马林后,通过计算同侧足部收缩次数,在第1期和第2期定期量化疼痛行为。结果与对照组相比,BPC10、BPC20、BPC40和吗啡组机械异常痛阈值在2 h时明显升高,但升高后恢复到对照组水平。BPC-157组在切口后4天的阈值明显高于对照组。除吗啡组外,BPC组各阈值均于切口后7 d归一化。BPC10组、BPC20组、BPC40组和吗啡组的退缩次数均在第1期显著减少,而BPC-157组除吗啡组外均无明显减少。结论BPC-157仅在切口后短期有效。根据福尔马林测试,它在第1阶段也有效,但在第2阶段无效。尽管BPC-157具有抗炎和伤口愈合作用,但它可能具有短期的抗伤性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信