Comparative study of visual results obtained with two Trifocal lens models in cataract surgery

Alfredo Amigó-Francés, Alfredo Castillo‐Gómez, D. Carmona-González, Paula Martinez-Sorribes, A. Amigó
{"title":"Comparative study of visual results obtained with two Trifocal lens models in cataract surgery","authors":"Alfredo Amigó-Francés, Alfredo Castillo‐Gómez, D. Carmona-González, Paula Martinez-Sorribes, A. Amigó","doi":"10.17352/2455-1414.000074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare visual performance and Contrast Sensitivity (CS) outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in patients implanted with two Models of trifocal Intraocular Lenses (MIOLs). \nMethods: This non-randomized prospective clinical study included 40 eyes of 20 patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different MIOLs, the trifocal Fine Vision MIOL (20 eyes) (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium) and the trifocal Acriva Trinova MIOL (20 eyes) (VSY, Biotechnology, The Nederlands). Visual results, CS and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery.  \nResults: There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding distance and intermediate visual acuity. Finevision showed better near visual outcomes than Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033). Both MIOLs provided similar CS within normal age ranges. Satisfaction test performed on uncorrected patients showed a variable presence of tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena with both MIOLs. \nConclusions: When postoperative emmetropia was achieved, both MIOLs provided good outcomes for distance and intermediate vision with no differences in contrast sensitivity. Fine Vision MIOL gave better near visual acuity results. There were tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena in both groups.","PeriodicalId":15586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research","volume":"361 1","pages":"054-060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-1414.000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual performance and Contrast Sensitivity (CS) outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in patients implanted with two Models of trifocal Intraocular Lenses (MIOLs). Methods: This non-randomized prospective clinical study included 40 eyes of 20 patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different MIOLs, the trifocal Fine Vision MIOL (20 eyes) (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium) and the trifocal Acriva Trinova MIOL (20 eyes) (VSY, Biotechnology, The Nederlands). Visual results, CS and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery.  Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding distance and intermediate visual acuity. Finevision showed better near visual outcomes than Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033). Both MIOLs provided similar CS within normal age ranges. Satisfaction test performed on uncorrected patients showed a variable presence of tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena with both MIOLs. Conclusions: When postoperative emmetropia was achieved, both MIOLs provided good outcomes for distance and intermediate vision with no differences in contrast sensitivity. Fine Vision MIOL gave better near visual acuity results. There were tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena in both groups.
两种三焦晶体模型在白内障手术中视力效果的比较研究
目的:比较两种型号的三焦人工晶状体植入术患者的视觉表现、对比敏感度(CS)、患者满意度和眼镜独立性。方法:本非随机前瞻性临床研究纳入20例白内障手术患者40眼,双侧植入两种不同的MIOL,三焦Fine Vision MIOL(20眼)(PhysIOL, Liege,比利时)和三焦Acriva Trinova MIOL(20眼)(VSY, Biotechnology, the netherlands)。术后3个月评估视觉结果、CS和患者满意度。结果:两组之间的距离和中间视敏度差异无统计学意义。Finevision的近视效果优于Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033)。两种MIOLs在正常年龄范围内提供相似的CS。对未矫正的患者进行的满意度测试显示,两种MIOLs患者都存在可耐受的光异常现象。结论:当实现术后斜视时,两种MIOLs对远距离和中间视力都有良好的效果,对比敏感度没有差异。精细MIOL的近视力效果较好。两组均有可耐受的光异常现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信