Comparative Study of Four Filter-based Algorithms for State-of-charge Estimation of Lithium-ion Batteries

Yong Tian, Zhibing Zeng, Lijuan Xiang, Xiaoyu Li, Jindong Tian
{"title":"Comparative Study of Four Filter-based Algorithms for State-of-charge Estimation of Lithium-ion Batteries","authors":"Yong Tian, Zhibing Zeng, Lijuan Xiang, Xiaoyu Li, Jindong Tian","doi":"10.12783/dteees/iceee2019/31820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of state of charge (SOC) is greatly crucial for safely and reliably charging and discharging the lithium-ion batteries, especially for those used in electric vehicles (EVs). Currently, a lot of algorithms have been proposed to estimate the battery SOC. In this paper, we compared four filter-based algorithms, including the standard particle filter (PF), the unscented Kalman filter, the unscented Kalman-particle filter (UPF), and the extended Kalman-particle filter (EPF), in terms of the estimate accuracy and convergence rate. The federal urban driving schedule (FUDS) and the urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) were applied to evaluate the performance of these estimation algorithms. Comparison results showed that compared with the UKF, the PF can improve the estimate accuracy, however, it takes much more time to correct the initial SOC error. By introducing the EKF and UKF into the particle filter, the convergence rate can be greatly improved without the decrease in estimate accuracy, and convergence rate is very close to that of the UKF.","PeriodicalId":11324,"journal":{"name":"DEStech Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEStech Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12783/dteees/iceee2019/31820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of state of charge (SOC) is greatly crucial for safely and reliably charging and discharging the lithium-ion batteries, especially for those used in electric vehicles (EVs). Currently, a lot of algorithms have been proposed to estimate the battery SOC. In this paper, we compared four filter-based algorithms, including the standard particle filter (PF), the unscented Kalman filter, the unscented Kalman-particle filter (UPF), and the extended Kalman-particle filter (EPF), in terms of the estimate accuracy and convergence rate. The federal urban driving schedule (FUDS) and the urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS) were applied to evaluate the performance of these estimation algorithms. Comparison results showed that compared with the UKF, the PF can improve the estimate accuracy, however, it takes much more time to correct the initial SOC error. By introducing the EKF and UKF into the particle filter, the convergence rate can be greatly improved without the decrease in estimate accuracy, and convergence rate is very close to that of the UKF.
基于滤波的锂离子电池电量状态估计算法的比较研究
准确的荷电状态(SOC)估算对于锂离子电池,特别是电动汽车锂离子电池的安全、可靠充放电至关重要。目前,已经提出了许多估算电池SOC的算法。本文比较了标准粒子滤波(PF)、无气味卡尔曼滤波(unscented Kalman filter)、无气味卡尔曼粒子滤波(unscented Kalman-particle filter, UPF)和扩展卡尔曼粒子滤波(extended Kalman-particle filter, EPF)四种基于滤波器的算法在估计精度和收敛速度方面的差异。采用联邦城市驾驶计划(FUDS)和城市测功机驾驶计划(UDDS)对这些估计算法的性能进行了评价。对比结果表明,与UKF相比,PF可以提高估计精度,但校正初始SOC误差所需的时间要长得多。在粒子滤波中引入EKF和UKF,在不降低估计精度的情况下,大大提高了粒子滤波的收敛速度,收敛速度与UKF非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信