High Versus Low Intensity Summer Adolescent ADHD Treatment Effects on Internalizing, Social, and Self-Esteem Problems.

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Investigacion Economica Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1080/15374416.2022.2062761
Samantha Barney, Margaret H Sibley, Stefany J Coxe, Michael C Meinzer, William E Pelham
{"title":"High Versus Low Intensity Summer Adolescent ADHD Treatment Effects on Internalizing, Social, and Self-Esteem Problems.","authors":"Samantha Barney, Margaret H Sibley, Stefany J Coxe, Michael C Meinzer, William E Pelham","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2022.2062761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-intensity (HI) versus a low-intensity (LI) skills-based summer intervention delivered to adolescents with ADHD by school staff in improving depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, social problems, and self-esteem. Participants were 325 ethnically diverse rising sixth and ninth graders with ADHD randomized to an HI versus an LI intervention (<i>n</i> = 218) or recruited into an untreated comparison group (<i>n</i> = 107). Group x time and group x grade x time one-year outcome trajectories were compared using linear mixed models. Across the transitional year (sixth or ninth grade), adolescents in the HI group were found to experience significantly greater decreases in depressive symptoms (<i>p = </i>.022, <i>d</i> = .25) compared to the LI group. There was no significant impact of the HI intervention (vs. LI) on anxiety symptoms (<i>p = </i>.070, <i>d = </i>.29), social problems (<i>p = </i>.054, <i>d = </i>.34), or self-esteem (<i>p = </i>.837, <i>d</i> = 0.21); however, secondary analyses of the non-randomized untreated comparison group indicated a significant effect of HI versus the untreated comparison group on social problems (<i>p = </i>.009, <i>d = </i>43). These significant treatment effects suggest that comprehensive academic and organizational skills interventions for adolescents with ADHD may have a secondary impact of relieving adolescent depression for teens with this comorbidity. Given mixed evidence for the efficacy of the HI intervention on social skills, future work should further evaluate this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":44170,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Economica","volume":"74 1","pages":"389-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2062761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-intensity (HI) versus a low-intensity (LI) skills-based summer intervention delivered to adolescents with ADHD by school staff in improving depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, social problems, and self-esteem. Participants were 325 ethnically diverse rising sixth and ninth graders with ADHD randomized to an HI versus an LI intervention (n = 218) or recruited into an untreated comparison group (n = 107). Group x time and group x grade x time one-year outcome trajectories were compared using linear mixed models. Across the transitional year (sixth or ninth grade), adolescents in the HI group were found to experience significantly greater decreases in depressive symptoms (p = .022, d = .25) compared to the LI group. There was no significant impact of the HI intervention (vs. LI) on anxiety symptoms (p = .070, d = .29), social problems (p = .054, d = .34), or self-esteem (p = .837, d = 0.21); however, secondary analyses of the non-randomized untreated comparison group indicated a significant effect of HI versus the untreated comparison group on social problems (p = .009, d = 43). These significant treatment effects suggest that comprehensive academic and organizational skills interventions for adolescents with ADHD may have a secondary impact of relieving adolescent depression for teens with this comorbidity. Given mixed evidence for the efficacy of the HI intervention on social skills, future work should further evaluate this effect.

高强度与低强度夏季青少年多动症治疗对内化、社交和自尊问题的影响。
本研究旨在评估由学校教职员工为患有多动症的青少年提供的高强度(HI)与低强度(LI)技能型暑期干预在改善抑郁症状、焦虑症状、社交问题和自尊方面的效果。参与者为 325 名不同种族的六年级和九年级新入学的多动症学生,他们被随机分配到 HI 与 LI 干预组(n = 218)或未接受治疗的对比组(n = 107)。使用线性混合模型比较了 "组x时间 "和 "组x年级x时间 "的一年结果轨迹。在整个过渡年(六年级或九年级)期间,HI 组青少年的抑郁症状较 LI 组明显减少(p = .022, d = .25)。健康教育干预对焦虑症状(p = .070,d = .29)、社会问题(p = .054,d = .34)或自尊(p = .837,d = 0.21)没有明显影响;然而,对非随机未治疗对比组的二次分析表明,健康教育干预对未治疗对比组的社会问题有明显影响(p = .009,d = 43)。这些显着的治疗效果表明,对多动症青少年进行全面的学业和组织技能干预,可能会对患有这种合并症的青少年产生缓解青春期抑郁的辅助影响。鉴于HI干预对社交技能的疗效证据不一,未来的工作应进一步评估这一效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: It is a specialized journal, bilingual (Spanish and English), plural and critical, which accepts and publishes scientific research articles in national and international economy. It is considered a public good that belongs to the University and society. Its vocation is to analyze the evolution of the theoretical and practical economics. In its pages the paradigms of economics, history of economic thought, the theories and debates about economic policy and its consequences, the diagnosis of the Mexican economy, the economic development of Latin America and the problems spread the world economy in general. It is a journal that does not discriminate plural none paradigm; theoretical orientation is unorthodox for epistemological reasons, not ideological preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信