The effect of telemedicine plus application on the covid-19 patients’ quality of life

Q4 Medicine
Anis Laela Megasari, Masbahah -, Darmawan Lahru Riatma, Rizka Adela Fatsena
{"title":"The effect of telemedicine plus application on the covid-19 patients’ quality of life","authors":"Anis Laela Megasari, Masbahah -, Darmawan Lahru Riatma, Rizka Adela Fatsena","doi":"10.55131/jphd/2023/210205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The covid-19 pandemic affects human life quality. The consultations between patients and health workers are carried out online using telemedicine to stop transmission. This research aimed to assign the effect of the Telemedicine Plus application on the Covid-19 patients’ quality of life. The study method was quasi-experimental with the pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The participants were 60 patients who were confirmed positive for Covid-19 in the Ngoresan Region, Surakarta City. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. There were two types of subject criteria: the intervention group, given the Telemedicine Plus application and the control group, given standard therapy. The life quality of the Covid-19 patients was rated using the Short-Form 36 (SF 36) questionnaire. Participants who applied the Telemedicine Plus application experienced an increase in average life quality scores from 39.70 to 50.93, while respondents who received a standard therapy also experienced an increase from 39.93 to 41.67. The independent t-test indicated <0.001 (<0.05) for a p-value. It points out that there is a difference in life quality between the intervention group and the control group significantly. The Telemedicine Plus application improves the Covid-19 patients’ life quality more than patients who receive standard therapy.","PeriodicalId":36393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health and Development","volume":"261 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The covid-19 pandemic affects human life quality. The consultations between patients and health workers are carried out online using telemedicine to stop transmission. This research aimed to assign the effect of the Telemedicine Plus application on the Covid-19 patients’ quality of life. The study method was quasi-experimental with the pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. The participants were 60 patients who were confirmed positive for Covid-19 in the Ngoresan Region, Surakarta City. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. There were two types of subject criteria: the intervention group, given the Telemedicine Plus application and the control group, given standard therapy. The life quality of the Covid-19 patients was rated using the Short-Form 36 (SF 36) questionnaire. Participants who applied the Telemedicine Plus application experienced an increase in average life quality scores from 39.70 to 50.93, while respondents who received a standard therapy also experienced an increase from 39.93 to 41.67. The independent t-test indicated <0.001 (<0.05) for a p-value. It points out that there is a difference in life quality between the intervention group and the control group significantly. The Telemedicine Plus application improves the Covid-19 patients’ life quality more than patients who receive standard therapy.
远程医疗加应用对新冠肺炎患者生活质量的影响
covid-19大流行影响了人类的生活质量。患者和卫生工作者之间的咨询是利用远程医疗在线进行的,以阻止传播。本研究旨在确定远程医疗Plus应用程序对新冠肺炎患者生活质量的影响。研究方法为准实验,采用前测后测非等效对照组设计。参与者是苏拉arta市Ngoresan地区确诊为Covid-19阳性的60名患者。使用的抽样技术是有目的的抽样。有两种类型的受试者标准:干预组,给予远程医疗Plus应用,对照组,给予标准治疗。采用SF 36问卷对新冠肺炎患者的生活质量进行评分。使用远程医疗Plus应用程序的参与者的平均生活质量得分从39.70提高到50.93,而接受标准治疗的受访者的平均生活质量得分也从39.93提高到41.67。独立t检验显示p值<0.001(<0.05)。指出干预组与对照组在生活质量上存在显著差异。远程医疗Plus应用程序比接受标准治疗的患者更能改善Covid-19患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health and Development
Journal of Public Health and Development Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信