Colorectal Cancer in Octogenarians: Results of Treatment, a Descriptive Clinical Study

E. E. V. Eeghen, S. Bakker, R. Loffeld
{"title":"Colorectal Cancer in Octogenarians: Results of Treatment, a Descriptive Clinical Study","authors":"E. E. V. Eeghen, S. Bakker, R. Loffeld","doi":"10.17795/ACR-32715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) often occur in octogenarians. However, data on treatment and survival are sparse. Objectives: Octogenarians were studied in order to gain data on treatment, outcomes, and survival related to CRC. Patients andMethods: All consecutive octogenarians with CRC in the period of 2002 2008 were included. An extensive review of hospital records was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups, as follows: group 1 included patients who were alive after five years of follow-up, while group 2 comprised patients who died within 5 years of their diagnosis. Cause of death was determined and classified as related to cancer, non-related, or because of treatment. Results: One hundred and eleven octogenarians were diagnosed with CRC (82 colon cancers and 29 rectal cancers). Patients in group 2 had a significantly higher disease stage compared with group 1 (P < 0.001). Patients in group 1 more often underwent surgery with curative intent (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in clinical presentation or localization of the malignancy. In group 1, 14 patients died more than 5 years after surgery. The cause of death was not related to cancer in 100% of cases. In group 2, 29 (46.0%) died as a direct consequence of CRC, 14 (22.2%) due to the treatment, and 20 (31.7%) died due to non-cancer-related causes. The overall 5year survival rate was 40% in colon cancer patients and 51.7% in rectal cancer patients. The Charlson age co-morbidity scores were significantly lower in colon cancer patients in group 1 (P = 0.005). This was not the case in patients with rectal cancer. Conclusions: The co-morbidity score is important in survival after surgery. Forty-four percent of octogenarians with CRC died because of non-tumor-related disease or illness. Fit elderly people can benefit from standard therapy for CRC.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/ACR-32715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) often occur in octogenarians. However, data on treatment and survival are sparse. Objectives: Octogenarians were studied in order to gain data on treatment, outcomes, and survival related to CRC. Patients andMethods: All consecutive octogenarians with CRC in the period of 2002 2008 were included. An extensive review of hospital records was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups, as follows: group 1 included patients who were alive after five years of follow-up, while group 2 comprised patients who died within 5 years of their diagnosis. Cause of death was determined and classified as related to cancer, non-related, or because of treatment. Results: One hundred and eleven octogenarians were diagnosed with CRC (82 colon cancers and 29 rectal cancers). Patients in group 2 had a significantly higher disease stage compared with group 1 (P < 0.001). Patients in group 1 more often underwent surgery with curative intent (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in clinical presentation or localization of the malignancy. In group 1, 14 patients died more than 5 years after surgery. The cause of death was not related to cancer in 100% of cases. In group 2, 29 (46.0%) died as a direct consequence of CRC, 14 (22.2%) due to the treatment, and 20 (31.7%) died due to non-cancer-related causes. The overall 5year survival rate was 40% in colon cancer patients and 51.7% in rectal cancer patients. The Charlson age co-morbidity scores were significantly lower in colon cancer patients in group 1 (P = 0.005). This was not the case in patients with rectal cancer. Conclusions: The co-morbidity score is important in survival after surgery. Forty-four percent of octogenarians with CRC died because of non-tumor-related disease or illness. Fit elderly people can benefit from standard therapy for CRC.
八旬老人结直肠癌:治疗结果,一项描述性临床研究
背景:结直肠癌(crc)常见于80多岁老人。然而,关于治疗和生存的数据很少。目的:研究八十多岁老人,以获得与CRC相关的治疗、结局和生存数据。患者和方法:纳入2002年至2008年期间所有连续的80多岁结直肠癌患者。对医院记录进行了广泛的审查。将患者分为两组,第1组为随访5年后仍存活的患者,第2组为确诊后5年内死亡的患者。死亡原因被确定并分类为与癌症有关、与癌症无关或由于治疗。结果:111名80多岁的老人被诊断为结直肠癌(结肠癌82例,直肠癌29例)。2组患者的疾病分期明显高于1组(P < 0.001)。1组患者更常接受有治愈意图的手术(P < 0.0001)。在临床表现或恶性肿瘤的定位上没有差异。第1组有14例患者术后5年以上死亡。在所有病例中,死亡原因与癌症无关。在第2组中,29人(46.0%)死于结直肠癌的直接后果,14人(22.2%)死于治疗,20人(31.7%)死于非癌症相关原因。结肠癌患者总体5年生存率为40%,直肠癌患者为51.7%。1组结肠癌患者的Charlson年龄共发病评分明显低于对照组(P = 0.005)。而在直肠癌患者中则不是这样。结论:合并症评分对术后生存有重要意义。44%的八十多岁结直肠癌患者死于非肿瘤相关疾病或疾病。健康的老年人可以从CRC的标准治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信