FACTORS INFLUENCING ADAPTIVE REUSE OF DECLINING SHOPPING MALLS IN THE U.S.: A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER VIEW

IF 0.7 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Eunhwa Yang, Sun-Ah Hong, Yujin Kim
{"title":"FACTORS INFLUENCING ADAPTIVE REUSE OF DECLINING SHOPPING MALLS IN THE U.S.: A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER VIEW","authors":"Eunhwa Yang, Sun-Ah Hong, Yujin Kim","doi":"10.3992/jgb.17.2.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The majority of shopping malls in the U.S. have few options but to repurpose their soon-to-be empty spaces. However, developers and mall owners face a challenge to find out which solutions are best for their specific situations. This paper aims to identify decision factors for the adaptive reuse of declining malls in the U.S., revealing different perspectives of multiple stakeholders. This study proposed a conceptual framework specifically for decision-makers linked to the adaptive reuse of shopping malls. The survey asked a professional opinion on the method of mall revitalization and the importance of seven decision categories: physical, economic, functional, technological, social, legal, and political aspects. A total of 41 valid responses were analyzed. Stakeholders reported different views on seven decision categories. Investors, AEC (Architect, Engineer, and Contractor) professionals, developers, and building manager groups reported the economic category as the most important variable, whereas marketer and regulator groups responded that the legal category is the most important variable. The technology was reported as the least important variable from AEC professionals, marketers, developers, and building managers. Investors and regulators indicated the social category as the least important variable. The findings of this study are rather exploratory, not conclusive due to its limited sample size. As many more shopping malls face or will face challenges of closing, the solutions for these empty or soon-to-be empty facilities should be further studied.","PeriodicalId":51753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Green Building","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Green Building","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.17.2.83","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of shopping malls in the U.S. have few options but to repurpose their soon-to-be empty spaces. However, developers and mall owners face a challenge to find out which solutions are best for their specific situations. This paper aims to identify decision factors for the adaptive reuse of declining malls in the U.S., revealing different perspectives of multiple stakeholders. This study proposed a conceptual framework specifically for decision-makers linked to the adaptive reuse of shopping malls. The survey asked a professional opinion on the method of mall revitalization and the importance of seven decision categories: physical, economic, functional, technological, social, legal, and political aspects. A total of 41 valid responses were analyzed. Stakeholders reported different views on seven decision categories. Investors, AEC (Architect, Engineer, and Contractor) professionals, developers, and building manager groups reported the economic category as the most important variable, whereas marketer and regulator groups responded that the legal category is the most important variable. The technology was reported as the least important variable from AEC professionals, marketers, developers, and building managers. Investors and regulators indicated the social category as the least important variable. The findings of this study are rather exploratory, not conclusive due to its limited sample size. As many more shopping malls face or will face challenges of closing, the solutions for these empty or soon-to-be empty facilities should be further studied.
影响美国衰落购物中心适应性再利用的因素:多方利益相关者的观点
美国大多数购物中心都别无选择,只能重新利用即将空置的空间。然而,开发商和商场业主面临着一个挑战,那就是找到最适合他们具体情况的解决方案。本文旨在确定美国衰落购物中心适应性再利用的决策因素,揭示多个利益相关者的不同观点。本研究专门为决策者提出了一个与购物中心适应性再利用相关的概念框架。该调查对购物中心振兴的方法和物质、经济、功能、技术、社会、法律、政治等7个领域的重要性进行了专业意见调查。对41份有效问卷进行分析。利益相关者报告了对七个决策类别的不同看法。投资者、AEC(建筑师、工程师和承包商)专业人士、开发商和建筑管理者群体报告称,经济类别是最重要的变量,而营销人员和监管机构群体回应称,法律类别是最重要的变量。技术被认为是AEC专业人员、市场营销人员、开发人员和建筑管理人员最不重要的变量。投资者和监管机构表示,社会类别是最不重要的变量。由于样本量有限,本研究的结果是探索性的,而不是结论性的。随着越来越多的购物中心面临或将面临关闭的挑战,应该进一步研究这些空置或即将空置的设施的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Green Building is to present the very best peer-reviewed research in green building design, construction, engineering, technological innovation, facilities management, building information modeling, and community and urban planning. The Research section of the Journal of Green Building publishes peer-reviewed articles in the fields of engineering, architecture, construction, construction management, building science, facilities management, landscape architecture, interior design, urban and community planning, and all disciplines related to the built environment. In addition, the Journal of Green Building offers the following sections: Industry Corner that offers applied articles of successfully completed sustainable buildings and landscapes; New Directions in Teaching and Research that offers guidance from teachers and researchers on incorporating innovative sustainable learning into the curriculum or the likely directions of future research; and Campus Sustainability that offers articles from programs dedicated to greening the university campus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信