Dissecting the illegal pangolin trade in China: An insight from seizures data reports

IF 1.2 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
J. K. Omifolaji, A. Hughes, A. Ibrahim, Jinfeng Zhou, Siyuan Zhang, E. Ikyaagba, Xiaofeng Luan
{"title":"Dissecting the illegal pangolin trade in China: An insight from seizures data reports","authors":"J. K. Omifolaji, A. Hughes, A. Ibrahim, Jinfeng Zhou, Siyuan Zhang, E. Ikyaagba, Xiaofeng Luan","doi":"10.3897/natureconservation.45.57962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildlife trafficking poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Species such as pangolins are particularly vulnerable and trade continues almost unabated despite numerous interventions aimed at eradicating illegal wildlife trade. Despite restrictions on the pangolin trade, thousands of pangolins continue to be intercepted annually. We focused on China because of the recent delisting of pangolins from the Chinese pharmacopeia, and their removal from healthcare insurance, despite deeply ingrained traditions of having pangolins for ethno-medicinal use. We collated pangolin interception data from public online media seizure reports to characterize the pangolin trade within China, and found that a total of 326 independent seizures equivalent to 143,130 pangolins (31,676 individuals and 222,908 kg of scale) were reported in 26 provinces. Pangolin domestic seizures are greatest in the southern cities of Dehong, Fangchenggang, and Guangzhou. Also, we found 17 countries within the global pangolins range which were the major source of the pangolin shipments to China. The number of arrests and convictions was much lower than the number of pangolin incidents reported. Our results show a significant increase in the volume of scales and number of live pangolin seizures after amended endangered species law came into effect in 2018, and recorded the highest number of individual pangolin interceptions. China has shown increasing wildlife seizures over time, owing partly to emergent trends in the international wildlife trade as well as increasing global demand for ethnomedicine. The future eradication of illegal wildlife trade in China is dependent not only on stringent border control and offender prosecution but also the; removal of other threatened species from the pharmacopeia and healthcare insurance which includes wildlife derivatives. Furthermore, our work highlights importance of current policy intervention to combat the pangolin trade within China, and the need for further interventions both within China and in export countries.","PeriodicalId":54166,"journal":{"name":"Nature Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.45.57962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Wildlife trafficking poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Species such as pangolins are particularly vulnerable and trade continues almost unabated despite numerous interventions aimed at eradicating illegal wildlife trade. Despite restrictions on the pangolin trade, thousands of pangolins continue to be intercepted annually. We focused on China because of the recent delisting of pangolins from the Chinese pharmacopeia, and their removal from healthcare insurance, despite deeply ingrained traditions of having pangolins for ethno-medicinal use. We collated pangolin interception data from public online media seizure reports to characterize the pangolin trade within China, and found that a total of 326 independent seizures equivalent to 143,130 pangolins (31,676 individuals and 222,908 kg of scale) were reported in 26 provinces. Pangolin domestic seizures are greatest in the southern cities of Dehong, Fangchenggang, and Guangzhou. Also, we found 17 countries within the global pangolins range which were the major source of the pangolin shipments to China. The number of arrests and convictions was much lower than the number of pangolin incidents reported. Our results show a significant increase in the volume of scales and number of live pangolin seizures after amended endangered species law came into effect in 2018, and recorded the highest number of individual pangolin interceptions. China has shown increasing wildlife seizures over time, owing partly to emergent trends in the international wildlife trade as well as increasing global demand for ethnomedicine. The future eradication of illegal wildlife trade in China is dependent not only on stringent border control and offender prosecution but also the; removal of other threatened species from the pharmacopeia and healthcare insurance which includes wildlife derivatives. Furthermore, our work highlights importance of current policy intervention to combat the pangolin trade within China, and the need for further interventions both within China and in export countries.
Dissecting中国非法穿山甲贸易:来自查获数据报告的洞察
野生动物走私对全球生物多样性构成重大威胁。穿山甲等物种尤其脆弱,尽管有许多旨在消除非法野生动物贸易的干预措施,但贸易仍几乎有增无减。尽管对穿山甲贸易有限制,但每年仍有数千只穿山甲被截获。我们之所以关注中国,是因为最近中国将穿山甲从药典中除名,并将其从医疗保险中除名,尽管穿山甲被用于民族医药的传统根深蒂固。我们整理了来自公开网络媒体查获的穿山甲截获数据,以描述中国境内穿山甲贸易的特征,发现26个省份共报告了326起独立查获,相当于143,130只穿山甲(31,676只,222,908公斤鳞片)。国内查获穿山甲最多的是南部城市德宏、防城港和广州。此外,我们发现全球范围内的17个国家是中国穿山甲出口的主要来源国。逮捕和定罪的数量远低于报道的穿山甲事件的数量。我们的研究结果显示,2018年修订的《濒危物种法》生效后,穿山甲鳞片的数量和活体查获的数量显著增加,并记录了截获穿山甲个体的最高数量。随着时间的推移,中国的野生动物缉获量不断增加,部分原因是国际野生动物贸易的新趋势以及全球对民族药的需求不断增加。未来在中国根除野生动物非法贸易不仅依赖于严格的边境管制和对违法者的起诉,还依赖于政府的监管。从药典和医疗保险(包括野生动物衍生物)中删除其他受威胁物种。此外,我们的工作强调了当前政策干预对打击中国境内穿山甲贸易的重要性,以及中国国内和出口国进一步干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Conservation Research
Nature Conservation Research BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信