The Evaluation of Green Building’s Feasibility: Comparative Analysis across Different Geological Conditions

Jessica McKenna, Sophia Harris, Kris Heinrich, Taylor Stewart, K. Gharehbaghi
{"title":"The Evaluation of Green Building’s Feasibility: Comparative Analysis across Different Geological Conditions","authors":"Jessica McKenna, Sophia Harris, Kris Heinrich, Taylor Stewart, K. Gharehbaghi","doi":"10.3390/eng4030115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green building materials have nontoxic properties and are made from recycled materials. This means they are, in most cases, created from renewable resources in comparison to non-renewable resources. This research aims to further improve the justification of green buildings and their materials. This is undertaken to determine the validity of such construction techniques. This research utilizes both qualitative and quantitative methods through five Australian case studies. The case studies, which are based on new and redeveloped structures, are selected via different geological locations and are evaluated via logical argumentation along with correlation research. Further, the research will address the problem by identifying a variety of green building materials that can be used to substitute non-green building materials. With careful comparisons among the five buildings, the green signs and implementation advantages and disadvantages will be evaluated. The result of this comparison will assist in improving the current education around the topic of green building and benefit the overall response to positive change within the construction industry. Although green building initiatives are not difficult to apply, they can be cost efficient. To maximize their cost efficiency, these initiatives need to be fully adopted. This includes the adaptation of specific building orientation, design, and sealing off penetrations to greatly improve passive heating and cooling. Further, the use of rainwater tanks also assists with energy efficiency by reducing the amount of mains water used. The utilization of natural lighting along with an advanced solar power system would further reduce the overall energy usage.","PeriodicalId":10630,"journal":{"name":"Comput. Chem. Eng.","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comput. Chem. Eng.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/eng4030115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Green building materials have nontoxic properties and are made from recycled materials. This means they are, in most cases, created from renewable resources in comparison to non-renewable resources. This research aims to further improve the justification of green buildings and their materials. This is undertaken to determine the validity of such construction techniques. This research utilizes both qualitative and quantitative methods through five Australian case studies. The case studies, which are based on new and redeveloped structures, are selected via different geological locations and are evaluated via logical argumentation along with correlation research. Further, the research will address the problem by identifying a variety of green building materials that can be used to substitute non-green building materials. With careful comparisons among the five buildings, the green signs and implementation advantages and disadvantages will be evaluated. The result of this comparison will assist in improving the current education around the topic of green building and benefit the overall response to positive change within the construction industry. Although green building initiatives are not difficult to apply, they can be cost efficient. To maximize their cost efficiency, these initiatives need to be fully adopted. This includes the adaptation of specific building orientation, design, and sealing off penetrations to greatly improve passive heating and cooling. Further, the use of rainwater tanks also assists with energy efficiency by reducing the amount of mains water used. The utilization of natural lighting along with an advanced solar power system would further reduce the overall energy usage.
绿色建筑可行性评价:不同地质条件下的比较分析
绿色建筑材料具有无毒的特性,并且是由可回收材料制成的。这意味着,在大多数情况下,与不可再生资源相比,它们是由可再生资源创造的。本研究旨在进一步提高绿色建筑及其材料的合理性。这样做是为了确定这种施工技术的有效性。本研究采用定性和定量方法,通过五个澳大利亚的案例研究。案例研究基于新的和重新开发的结构,通过不同的地质位置进行选择,并通过逻辑论证和相关性研究进行评估。此外,研究将通过确定各种绿色建筑材料,可用于替代非绿色建筑材料来解决这个问题。通过对五座建筑的仔细比较,评估绿色标志和实施的优缺点。这种比较的结果将有助于改善围绕绿色建筑主题的当前教育,并有利于建筑行业内积极变化的整体反应。虽然实施绿色建筑措施并不困难,但它们的成本效益很高。为了最大限度地提高成本效益,这些举措需要得到充分采用。这包括适应特定的建筑方向、设计和密封渗透,以大大改善被动式供暖和制冷。此外,雨水储存罐的使用也有助于减少总用水量,从而提高能源效率。自然采光的利用以及先进的太阳能发电系统将进一步减少整体能源消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信