Students' perspectives in relation to academic counseling in the university: A qualitative study using Content analysis

F. Rezapur-Shahkolai, N. Salimi, Kh Ezzati Rastgar, E. Gheysvandi, P. Parsa, Mitra Dogonchi
{"title":"Students' perspectives in relation to academic counseling in the university: A qualitative study using Content analysis","authors":"F. Rezapur-Shahkolai, N. Salimi, Kh Ezzati Rastgar, E. Gheysvandi, P. Parsa, Mitra Dogonchi","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v15i3.4893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Proper counseling are very important to improve the quality of life and progress in society, especially in educational centers. The present qualitative study was designed and implemented according to the importance of deep students' opinions to improve the counseling process. \nMethods: This present study was a qualitative study which was conducted using Content analysis. Participants in this study were 30 students who were selected through purposive sampling, with maximum diversity. In this study, data were obtained using semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using Conventional content analysis. \nResult: From the students' point of view, the challenges facing academic counseling included two main themes, four main categories and seven sub-categories. Main themes included “need to improve the organizational factors related to consulling process” and “need to improve the individual factorsamong faculty members and student” and the main categories included lack of proper information to the student, unavailability of consultant faculty members, to select consultant faculty members without considering a student opinion and to be improper the communication between consultant faculty members  and student. Regarding the facilitators of the counseling process, one main theme (strengthening the organizational factors related to consulling process), three main categories and four sub-categories were obtained. The main categories included the separation of the counselor from the faculty members, empowerment of the counselors and student’s freedom to choose a counselor. \nConclusion: The results of the present study show that the process of academic counseling in the university faces organizational and individual challenges such as lack of proper information to the student, unavailability of consultant faculty members, to select consultant faculty members without considering the students opinion, and to be improper the communication between consultant faculty members  and students. Based on the students' views, it seems that by separation of the counselor from the faculty members, empowerment of the counselors and student’s freedom to choose a counselor, the academic counseling process in the university can be improved.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v15i3.4893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proper counseling are very important to improve the quality of life and progress in society, especially in educational centers. The present qualitative study was designed and implemented according to the importance of deep students' opinions to improve the counseling process. Methods: This present study was a qualitative study which was conducted using Content analysis. Participants in this study were 30 students who were selected through purposive sampling, with maximum diversity. In this study, data were obtained using semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using Conventional content analysis. Result: From the students' point of view, the challenges facing academic counseling included two main themes, four main categories and seven sub-categories. Main themes included “need to improve the organizational factors related to consulling process” and “need to improve the individual factorsamong faculty members and student” and the main categories included lack of proper information to the student, unavailability of consultant faculty members, to select consultant faculty members without considering a student opinion and to be improper the communication between consultant faculty members  and student. Regarding the facilitators of the counseling process, one main theme (strengthening the organizational factors related to consulling process), three main categories and four sub-categories were obtained. The main categories included the separation of the counselor from the faculty members, empowerment of the counselors and student’s freedom to choose a counselor. Conclusion: The results of the present study show that the process of academic counseling in the university faces organizational and individual challenges such as lack of proper information to the student, unavailability of consultant faculty members, to select consultant faculty members without considering the students opinion, and to be improper the communication between consultant faculty members  and students. Based on the students' views, it seems that by separation of the counselor from the faculty members, empowerment of the counselors and student’s freedom to choose a counselor, the academic counseling process in the university can be improved.
学生对大学学业辅导的看法:一项使用内容分析的质性研究
导读:适当的心理咨询对提高生活质量和社会进步非常重要,尤其是在教育中心。本定性研究是根据深层学生意见对改善辅导过程的重要性而设计和实施的。方法:本研究采用内容分析法进行定性研究。本研究的参与者为30名学生,通过有目的的抽样选择,具有最大的多样性。在本研究中,使用半结构化访谈获得数据,并使用常规内容分析进行分析。结果:从学生的角度来看,学业咨询面临的挑战包括两个主题,四个主要类别和七个小类别。主要主题包括“需要改善与咨询过程相关的组织因素”和“需要改善教师和学生之间的个人因素”,主要类别包括缺乏向学生提供适当的信息,顾问教师的可用性,在选择顾问教师时不考虑学生的意见,以及顾问教师和学生之间的沟通不当。在咨询过程的促进因素方面,有一个主题(加强与咨询过程相关的组织因素),三个主要类别和四个小类别。主要包括辅导员与教师的分离、辅导员的授权和学生选择辅导员的自由。结论:本研究的结果表明,大学的学业咨询过程面临着组织和个人的挑战,如缺乏适当的信息给学生,没有咨询教师,在选择咨询教师时不考虑学生的意见,以及咨询教师与学生之间的沟通不当。从学生的观点来看,通过辅导员与教师的分离、辅导员的授权和学生选择辅导员的自由,似乎可以改善大学的学术咨询过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信