Executive Functioning in the Schools: Perspectives from Occupational Therapists

Kelsey R. Tanis, Jacqueline Erb
{"title":"Executive Functioning in the Schools: Perspectives from Occupational Therapists","authors":"Kelsey R. Tanis, Jacqueline Erb","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2022.2084206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Awareness of executive functioning and its relevance to both occupational participation and special education is expanding. This study describes how school-based occupational therapists address executive functioning in practice and determined if this differs from traditional areas. Fourteen occupational therapists from four districts in Michigan completed the 36-item online survey consisting of closed and open-ended questions. A majority of these participants agreed that executive functioning impacts school function and occupational therapists should address it in school; yet, only 33% provided intervention using this lens and 77% indicated this as the area they feel least prepared to address in school-based practice. Executive function practice significantly differed from handwriting (p < .05), sensory (p < .01), and fine motor competency (p < .01); fine motor and sensory evaluation (p < .05); and handwriting intervention (p < .05). Participants described their role with executive functioning as collaborative, supplemental to enhance participation, and applicable to functional organization tasks. Although some occupational therapists are embracing an occupation-based process explicitly considering executive functioning, a majority need continued education, role clarity, and advocacy to more intentionally align their team’s services with emerging best practice.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"88 1","pages":"330 - 345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2084206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Awareness of executive functioning and its relevance to both occupational participation and special education is expanding. This study describes how school-based occupational therapists address executive functioning in practice and determined if this differs from traditional areas. Fourteen occupational therapists from four districts in Michigan completed the 36-item online survey consisting of closed and open-ended questions. A majority of these participants agreed that executive functioning impacts school function and occupational therapists should address it in school; yet, only 33% provided intervention using this lens and 77% indicated this as the area they feel least prepared to address in school-based practice. Executive function practice significantly differed from handwriting (p < .05), sensory (p < .01), and fine motor competency (p < .01); fine motor and sensory evaluation (p < .05); and handwriting intervention (p < .05). Participants described their role with executive functioning as collaborative, supplemental to enhance participation, and applicable to functional organization tasks. Although some occupational therapists are embracing an occupation-based process explicitly considering executive functioning, a majority need continued education, role clarity, and advocacy to more intentionally align their team’s services with emerging best practice.
学校的执行功能:职业治疗师的视角
对执行功能及其与职业参与和特殊教育的相关性的认识正在扩大。本研究描述了以学校为基础的职业治疗师如何在实践中解决执行功能问题,并确定这是否与传统领域不同。来自密歇根州四个地区的14名职业治疗师完成了36项在线调查,包括封闭式和开放式问题。大多数参与者同意执行功能影响学校功能,职业治疗师应该在学校解决这个问题;然而,只有33%的人使用这一视角进行干预,77%的人表示这是他们在学校实践中最不准备解决的领域。执行功能练习与书写(p < 0.05)、感觉(p < 0.01)和精细运动能力(p < 0.01)有显著差异;精细运动和感觉评价(p < 0.05);手写干预(p < 0.05)。参与者将他们的角色描述为具有执行功能的协作性、补充性,以增强参与,并适用于功能性组织任务。虽然一些职业治疗师正在接受基于职业的流程,明确考虑执行功能,但大多数人需要继续教育,角色明确,并倡导更有意地将他们的团队服务与新兴的最佳实践结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信