Review of the large-sized species of the genus Eupiestus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Piestinae), with notes on the adult feeding habit

IF 0.4 4区农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY

Oriental Insects Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/00305316.2021.1988744

Yoshihiro Senda

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The large-sized species of the genus Eupiestus Kraatz were reviewed taxonomically. Eupiestus miriceps Fauvel, 1902, is redescribed with a detailed illustration of the male genital parts. Eupiestus giganteus Shibata, 1991, was synonymised with E. callosus Fauvel, 1902. Eupiestus miriceps and E. spinifer were newly recorded from the Malay Peninsula (Malaysia: Selangor) and Laos, respectively. Habitus photographs of all species including the holotype of E. spinifer var. unicolor Cameron are given. A key for the identification of large-sized Eupiestus species and the list of the world Eupiestus species are provided. Observation of the mid-gut contents suggests that Eupiestus species are fungivorous, at least in adults of a few species.

查看原文本刊更多论文

文章标题大翅蝽属物种综述(鞘翅目:葡萄蝇科:棘蝽科)及其成虫食性

摘要本文对大鲵属(Eupiestus Kraatz)的大型种进行了分类综述。1902年，用男性生殖器的详细插图进行了重新描述。Shibata(1991)与E. callosus Fauvel(1902)同义。miiceps Eupiestus和spinifer Eupiestus分别为新记录于马来半岛(马来西亚:雪兰莪)和老挝。本文给出了所有物种的习性照片，其中包括单色卡麦伦的全模照片。本文还提供了一种大型猪属植物的鉴定关键字和世界猪属植物名录。对中肠内容物的观察表明，至少在一些种类的成虫中，Eupiestus是食真菌的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Oriental Insects 生物-昆虫学

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Oriental Insects is an international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of original research articles and reviews on the taxonomy, ecology, biodiversity and evolution of insects and other land arthropods of the Old World and Australia. Manuscripts referring to Africa, Australia and Oceania are highly welcomed. Research papers covering the study of behaviour, conservation, forensic and medical entomology, urban entomology and pest control are encouraged, provided that the research has relevance to Old World or Australian entomofauna. Precedence will be given to more general manuscripts (e.g. revisions of higher taxa, papers with combined methodologies or referring to larger geographic units). Descriptive manuscripts should refer to more than a single species and contain more general results or discussion (e.g. determination keys, biological or ecological data etc.). Laboratory works without zoogeographic or taxonomic reference to the scope of the journal will not be accepted.