Ekonomi Politik Media Dalam Industri Musik Digital Spotify

Nur Amala Saputri
{"title":"Ekonomi Politik Media Dalam Industri Musik Digital Spotify","authors":"Nur Amala Saputri","doi":"10.24042/komunika.v4i2.9406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the emergence of internet media, digital music was born which then marked as a change in the dominance of conventional recorded music. It is slowly and surely replacing the roles of conventional media, starting from the production process, distribution, to the level of music consumption. One of the most prominent music streaming platforms today is Spotify. In practice, the music streaming platform Spotify acts as a cultural industry that seeks to obscure people's real needs. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method based on a critical paradigm. With the aim of analyzing power relations in cultural practices that have been built by the digital music industry, either through the media or by the owners of capital through the perspective of the political economy of communication media. There are 2 main findings as a result of the study. First, there are 5 forms of digital music standardization that emerged because of the Spotify platform. Second, there are 2 forms of culture created from the relationship and identity of digital music actors, namely, the trend of soloist musicians or music by do it yourself, and bargaining power between musicians and music labels. In the end, Spotify is the party who benefits the most because it acts as a mediator who provides services or services for digital music streaming providers.","PeriodicalId":55749,"journal":{"name":"Komunika","volume":"294 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Komunika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/komunika.v4i2.9406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the emergence of internet media, digital music was born which then marked as a change in the dominance of conventional recorded music. It is slowly and surely replacing the roles of conventional media, starting from the production process, distribution, to the level of music consumption. One of the most prominent music streaming platforms today is Spotify. In practice, the music streaming platform Spotify acts as a cultural industry that seeks to obscure people's real needs. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method based on a critical paradigm. With the aim of analyzing power relations in cultural practices that have been built by the digital music industry, either through the media or by the owners of capital through the perspective of the political economy of communication media. There are 2 main findings as a result of the study. First, there are 5 forms of digital music standardization that emerged because of the Spotify platform. Second, there are 2 forms of culture created from the relationship and identity of digital music actors, namely, the trend of soloist musicians or music by do it yourself, and bargaining power between musicians and music labels. In the end, Spotify is the party who benefits the most because it acts as a mediator who provides services or services for digital music streaming providers.
数字Spotify音乐产业中的媒体政治经济学
自从互联网媒体出现以来,数字音乐诞生了,这标志着传统录制音乐主导地位的改变。从制作过程、发行到音乐消费,它正在缓慢而坚定地取代传统媒体的角色。Spotify是当今最著名的音乐流媒体平台之一。实际上,音乐流媒体平台Spotify充当了一个文化产业,试图掩盖人们的真实需求。本研究采用一种基于批判范式的定性描述方法。目的是通过传播媒介的政治经济学视角,分析数字音乐产业通过媒介或资本所有者所建立的文化实践中的权力关系。这项研究有两个主要发现。首先,由于Spotify平台的出现,出现了5种形式的数字音乐标准化。其次,数字音乐演员的关系和身份创造了两种文化形式,即独奏家或自己动手音乐的趋势,以及音乐家与音乐厂牌之间的议价能力。最终,Spotify是受益最大的一方,因为它充当了为数字音乐流媒体提供商提供服务或服务的调解人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信