The effectiveness of jigsaw learning strategy to teach speaking

Urip Widodo, Mugiyo Mugiyo
{"title":"The effectiveness of jigsaw learning strategy to teach speaking","authors":"Urip Widodo, Mugiyo Mugiyo","doi":"10.22437/ijolte.v5i2.15849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to know whether the jigsaw learning strategy is better than the audio-lingual method to teach speaking. This experimental research was carried out in the vocational school. The population was four classes (140 students) of eleventh grade A, B, C, D, and E. The samples were the eleventh grade A as the experimental group and B as the control group. Each group consists of 30 students. The experimental group was taught using the Jigsaw learning strategy, while the control group used the Audio-Lingual Method. The data collection technique was through the speaking test, and the data analysis technique was through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The data analysis shows that the mean score of the students who were taught by using the jigsaw learning strategy is 81,23, while the mean score of the students who were taught by using the audio-lingual method is 76,03. Moreover, the Fo (8,77) is higher than Ft (4,00) at the significance level of significance α= 0,05, which means the null hypotheses are rejected, and the alternative hypotheses are accepted. In conclusion, the jigsaw learning strategy is more effective than the audio-lingual method to teach speaking.","PeriodicalId":33478,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language Teaching and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/ijolte.v5i2.15849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to know whether the jigsaw learning strategy is better than the audio-lingual method to teach speaking. This experimental research was carried out in the vocational school. The population was four classes (140 students) of eleventh grade A, B, C, D, and E. The samples were the eleventh grade A as the experimental group and B as the control group. Each group consists of 30 students. The experimental group was taught using the Jigsaw learning strategy, while the control group used the Audio-Lingual Method. The data collection technique was through the speaking test, and the data analysis technique was through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The data analysis shows that the mean score of the students who were taught by using the jigsaw learning strategy is 81,23, while the mean score of the students who were taught by using the audio-lingual method is 76,03. Moreover, the Fo (8,77) is higher than Ft (4,00) at the significance level of significance α= 0,05, which means the null hypotheses are rejected, and the alternative hypotheses are accepted. In conclusion, the jigsaw learning strategy is more effective than the audio-lingual method to teach speaking.
拼图学习策略在口语教学中的有效性
本研究旨在了解拼图学习策略是否比听说教学法更适合口语教学。本实验研究是在职业学校进行的。总体为高二A、B、C、D、e四个班(140人),其中高二A为实验组,高二B为对照组。每组由30名学生组成。实验组采用拼图学习策略,对照组采用听语教学法。数据收集技术是通过口语测试,数据分析技术是通过描述性统计和推理统计。数据分析表明,采用拼图学习策略教学的学生的平均成绩为81.23分,而采用听语教学的学生的平均成绩为76.03分。而且,在显著性α= 0.05的显著性水平上,Fo(8,77)高于Ft(4,00),这意味着拒绝原假设,接受备选假设。综上所述,拼图学习策略比听说教学法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信