Evaluation of current United States swine selection indexes and indexes designed for Chinese pork production

J. Cheng , D.W. Newcom , M.M. Schutz , Q. Cui , B. Li , H. Zhang , A.P. Schinckel PAS
{"title":"Evaluation of current United States swine selection indexes and indexes designed for Chinese pork production","authors":"J. Cheng ,&nbsp;D.W. Newcom ,&nbsp;M.M. Schutz ,&nbsp;Q. Cui ,&nbsp;B. Li ,&nbsp;H. Zhang ,&nbsp;A.P. Schinckel PAS","doi":"10.15232/pas.2018-01731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective was to compare selection indexes based on the production costs and economic values from the United States and China. Indexes including terminal sire (TSI), maternal line (MLI), and sow productivity (SPI) were calculated based on the production costs and market prices for the United States and China. Estimated breeding values<span><span> for days to 113.5 kg, backfat depth, </span>loin<span><span> muscle area, number born alive, number weaned, litter weight<span> adjusted to 21 d, days from weaning to estrus, and litter birth weight were provided by a Chinese pig breeding company to evaluate alternative TSI and MLI indexes. The </span></span>Duroc data included 559 dams, 39 sires, 5,079 boars, and 4,809 gilts. The Landrace data included 199 dams, 83 sires, 2,749 boars, and 2,750 gilts. The Yorkshire data included 1,368 dams, 139 sires, 18,481 boars, and 17,962 gilts. The means, SD, and correlations for the estimated breeding values and indexes were calculated. The Chinese TSI values were more highly correlated (r = 0.97 to 0.99) with the US indexes than the MLI values (r = 0.92 to 0.97). Overall, the Chinese indexes had greater SD (TSI, 58 to 87% greater; SPI, 22 to 26% greater; MLI, 43 to 76% greater). The TSI were all highly correlated (r &gt;0.98) with feed conversion. The Chinese MLI values had greater correlations with TSI and lesser correlations with SPI than the US indexes. The Chinese MLI placed greater emphasis on the postweaning traits but less emphasis on sow productivity traits than did the current US MLI.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 474-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2018-01731","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618301311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The objective was to compare selection indexes based on the production costs and economic values from the United States and China. Indexes including terminal sire (TSI), maternal line (MLI), and sow productivity (SPI) were calculated based on the production costs and market prices for the United States and China. Estimated breeding values for days to 113.5 kg, backfat depth, loin muscle area, number born alive, number weaned, litter weight adjusted to 21 d, days from weaning to estrus, and litter birth weight were provided by a Chinese pig breeding company to evaluate alternative TSI and MLI indexes. The Duroc data included 559 dams, 39 sires, 5,079 boars, and 4,809 gilts. The Landrace data included 199 dams, 83 sires, 2,749 boars, and 2,750 gilts. The Yorkshire data included 1,368 dams, 139 sires, 18,481 boars, and 17,962 gilts. The means, SD, and correlations for the estimated breeding values and indexes were calculated. The Chinese TSI values were more highly correlated (r = 0.97 to 0.99) with the US indexes than the MLI values (r = 0.92 to 0.97). Overall, the Chinese indexes had greater SD (TSI, 58 to 87% greater; SPI, 22 to 26% greater; MLI, 43 to 76% greater). The TSI were all highly correlated (r >0.98) with feed conversion. The Chinese MLI values had greater correlations with TSI and lesser correlations with SPI than the US indexes. The Chinese MLI placed greater emphasis on the postweaning traits but less emphasis on sow productivity traits than did the current US MLI.

美国现行生猪选育指标与我国猪肉生产指标的评价
目的是比较美国和中国基于生产成本和经济价值的选择指标。根据美国和中国的生产成本和市场价格计算终端父系(TSI)、母系(MLI)和母猪生产力(SPI)等指标。为评价备选TSI和MLI指标,由中国某生猪养殖公司提供了饲养日数至113.5 kg、背膘深度、腰肌面积、活产数、断奶数、调整至21 d的窝重、断奶至发情天数和窝重。杜洛克的数据包括559头母猪、39头母猪、5079头公猪和4809头后备母猪。Landrace的数据包括199头水坝、83头母猪、2749头公猪和2750头后备母猪。约克郡的数据包括1,368头水坝、139头母猪、18,481头公猪和17,962头后备母猪。计算了估计育种值和指标的均值、SD和相关性。中国TSI值与美国指数的相关性(r = 0.97 ~ 0.99)高于MLI值(r = 0.92 ~ 0.97)。总体而言,中国指数的SD (TSI)更高,高出58%至87%;SPI提高22 ~ 26%;MLI高出43%到76%)。TSI均与饲料转化率高度相关(r >0.98)。与美国指数相比,中国的MLI值与TSI的相关性更大,与SPI的相关性更小。与目前的美国MLI相比,中国MLI更重视断奶后性状,但对母猪生产力性状的重视程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信