Surgical procedures in melanoma in 2020: recommended deep and lateral margins, indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and complete lymph node dissection.

IF 2 Q3 Medicine
E. Nagore, R. Moro
{"title":"Surgical procedures in melanoma in 2020: recommended deep and lateral margins, indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and complete lymph node dissection.","authors":"E. Nagore, R. Moro","doi":"10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06776-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nSurgery is the main treatment for cutaneous melanoma including the primary melanoma as well as lymph node metastases. The recommended margins have changed over time. Similarly, indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and complete lymph node dissection are constantly evolving as long as knowledge on the biological behavior of melanomas increases.\n\n\nEVIDENCE ACQUISITION\nThe current guidelines and the most relevant literature was reviewed to provide an update on the existing recommendations for surgical management of melanoma.\n\n\nEVIDENCE SYNTHESIS\nWide excision margins are evidenced-based but not for all situations. Melanoma in situ requires 0.5-1 cm with increasing evidence for 1 cm particularly those presenting on the head and in the setting of chronic sun damage. Invasive melanomas need 1-2 cm margins, 2 cm for tumors thicker than 2 mm and some large tumors with >1-2 mm thickness and with a lentiginous growth pattern. Lentigo maligna, subungual melanoma, and acral lentiginous melanoma require surgical techniques with complete circumferential peripheral margin assessment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides relevant information for melanoma staging. Therefore, it is consistently recommended for melanomas >1-4 mm and highly recommended for melanomas >4 mm, >0.8-1.0 mm or ≤0.8 mm with additional risk factors. Complete lymph node dissection has high morbidity and no impact on survival and is restricted to regional control for clinically detected metastasis.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough the trend is to reduce progressively the recommended surgical margins, further evidence is needed to clarify its role in patients' survival. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is important for establishing a prognosis especially upon considering adjuvant therapy; complete lymph node dissection is only relevant for regional disease control.","PeriodicalId":49071,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano Di Dermatologia E Venereologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano Di Dermatologia E Venereologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06776-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Surgery is the main treatment for cutaneous melanoma including the primary melanoma as well as lymph node metastases. The recommended margins have changed over time. Similarly, indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and complete lymph node dissection are constantly evolving as long as knowledge on the biological behavior of melanomas increases. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The current guidelines and the most relevant literature was reviewed to provide an update on the existing recommendations for surgical management of melanoma. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Wide excision margins are evidenced-based but not for all situations. Melanoma in situ requires 0.5-1 cm with increasing evidence for 1 cm particularly those presenting on the head and in the setting of chronic sun damage. Invasive melanomas need 1-2 cm margins, 2 cm for tumors thicker than 2 mm and some large tumors with >1-2 mm thickness and with a lentiginous growth pattern. Lentigo maligna, subungual melanoma, and acral lentiginous melanoma require surgical techniques with complete circumferential peripheral margin assessment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides relevant information for melanoma staging. Therefore, it is consistently recommended for melanomas >1-4 mm and highly recommended for melanomas >4 mm, >0.8-1.0 mm or ≤0.8 mm with additional risk factors. Complete lymph node dissection has high morbidity and no impact on survival and is restricted to regional control for clinically detected metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Although the trend is to reduce progressively the recommended surgical margins, further evidence is needed to clarify its role in patients' survival. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is important for establishing a prognosis especially upon considering adjuvant therapy; complete lymph node dissection is only relevant for regional disease control.
2020年黑色素瘤的外科手术:推荐的深缘和外侧缘,前哨淋巴结活检的适应症,以及完全淋巴结清扫。
手术是皮肤黑色素瘤的主要治疗方法,包括原发性黑色素瘤和淋巴结转移瘤。随着时间的推移,推荐的保证金已经发生了变化。同样,随着对黑色素瘤生物学行为的了解不断增加,前哨淋巴结活检和完全淋巴结清扫的适应症也在不断发展。证据获取我们回顾了目前的指南和最相关的文献,以提供黑色素瘤手术治疗的最新建议。证据综合:全范围切除边缘是基于证据的,但并非适用于所有情况。原位黑色素瘤需要0.5-1厘米,越来越多的证据表明,1厘米尤其是那些出现在头部和慢性日晒损伤的黑色素瘤。浸润性黑色素瘤需要1-2 cm的边缘,厚度大于2 mm的肿瘤需要2 cm边缘,一些厚度>1-2 mm的大肿瘤需要2 cm边缘,肿瘤呈透镜状生长。恶性色斑、甲下黑色素瘤和肢端色斑黑色素瘤需要手术技术和完整的外周边缘评估。前哨淋巴结活检提供了黑色素瘤分期的相关信息。因此,一贯建议对>1-4 mm的黑色素瘤进行手术,强烈建议对>4 mm、>0.8-1.0 mm或≤0.8 mm伴有其他危险因素的黑色素瘤进行手术。完全性淋巴结清扫发病率高,对生存无影响,临床发现的淋巴结转移仅限于局部控制。结论虽然推荐手术切缘的趋势是逐渐减少,但需要进一步的证据来阐明其在患者生存中的作用。前哨淋巴结活检对于确定预后非常重要,特别是在考虑辅助治疗时;完全淋巴结清扫只与局部疾病控制有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia publishes scientific papers on dermatology and sexually transmitted diseases. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信