Evaluating women’s labour in 1990s Japan: The changing labour standards Law

K. Rawstron
{"title":"Evaluating women’s labour in 1990s Japan: The changing labour standards Law","authors":"K. Rawstron","doi":"10.21159/NV.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is article outlines the legislative changes regarding Japanese working women in the 1990s, specifi cally the changes to the Labour Standards Law. Th is Law was altered in 1997 (eff ective 1999) by the removal of a number of provisions known as the Women’s ‘Protection’ Provisions (josei hogo kitei). Th ese gender-specifi c provisions restricted Japanese women from working particular jobs and hours, and limited overtime and holiday work. Th e role of these gender-specifi c provisions is examined through a collection of articles from four of Japan’s mainstream daily, widely-circulated newspapers: the Asahi Shinbun, the Mainichi Shinbun, the Nihon Keizai Shinbun, and the Yomiuri Shinbun. Th ese newspapers were of the opinion that the provisions were simultaneously protective and restrictive towards women. Th e newspapers all supported the removal of the provisions in order to increase equality in Japan’s workforce and society. However, all presented strong concerns that Japanese society was unable to support these changes. Th is article situates the law reform within the wider context of 1990s Japan, by tracing the links between labour legislation and socio-cultural issues in Japan, particularly the low fertility rate. Th is article closes with an evaluation of changes within Japanese society and working habits since the removal of the provisions.","PeriodicalId":92427,"journal":{"name":"New voices in psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":"57-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New voices in psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21159/NV.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Th is article outlines the legislative changes regarding Japanese working women in the 1990s, specifi cally the changes to the Labour Standards Law. Th is Law was altered in 1997 (eff ective 1999) by the removal of a number of provisions known as the Women’s ‘Protection’ Provisions (josei hogo kitei). Th ese gender-specifi c provisions restricted Japanese women from working particular jobs and hours, and limited overtime and holiday work. Th e role of these gender-specifi c provisions is examined through a collection of articles from four of Japan’s mainstream daily, widely-circulated newspapers: the Asahi Shinbun, the Mainichi Shinbun, the Nihon Keizai Shinbun, and the Yomiuri Shinbun. Th ese newspapers were of the opinion that the provisions were simultaneously protective and restrictive towards women. Th e newspapers all supported the removal of the provisions in order to increase equality in Japan’s workforce and society. However, all presented strong concerns that Japanese society was unable to support these changes. Th is article situates the law reform within the wider context of 1990s Japan, by tracing the links between labour legislation and socio-cultural issues in Japan, particularly the low fertility rate. Th is article closes with an evaluation of changes within Japanese society and working habits since the removal of the provisions.
20世纪90年代日本妇女劳动评价:劳动标准法的变化
这篇文章概述了1990年代关于日本职业妇女的立法变化,特别是《劳动基准法》的变化。该法于1997年进行了修改(1999年生效),删除了一些被称为妇女“保护”条款(josei hogo kitei)的条款。这些针对性别的规定限制了日本妇女从事特定的工作和工作时间,并限制了加班和假日工作。这些性别规定的作用是通过日本四家主流日报的文章集来审视的,这些报纸是广泛发行的:《朝日新闻》、《每日新闻》、《日本经济新闻》和《读卖新闻》。这些报纸认为,这些规定对妇女既是保护又是限制。报纸都支持取消这些条款,以增加日本劳动力和社会的平等。然而,所有人都强烈担心日本社会无法支持这些变化。这篇文章将法律改革置于1990年代日本更广泛的背景下,通过追踪劳工立法与日本社会文化问题之间的联系,特别是低生育率。这篇文章最后对日本社会和工作习惯的变化进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信