{"title":"Portret „teatrała”. Tadeusz Kudliński – krytyk...","authors":"Ewa Łubieniewska","doi":"10.24917/20811853.18.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tadeusz Kudliński remained in the memory of Cracovians, above all, as a theatre critic and the author of books dedicated to this topic, which have been republished many times. Serving the function of an educational mission, they combined a harmonious perspective of a historian, researcher, critic, polemicist and apologist, who was also a great story-teller. The role of a ‘theatre man’, which he assumed, also included contacts with amateur theatre, discussions with audience and cooperation with the Theatre Lovers Club. Views on art which had clashed in the preceding century, were clearly reflected in the monographs and collections of reviews written by the author, for whom the history of the theatre was, in fact, the history of drama. For years, Kudliński consistently carried out his ‘theatre lesson’. It revolved around numerous issues – from the description of various theatrical aesthetics, through the search for ‘a Polish style’ of performance, to the characterisation of experimental groups (e.g. Grotowski’s or student theatre). The critic placed experiment on the side of cultural life, on no account in the popular theatre, therefore, he criticised all Polish directors from the second half of the 20th century who staged ‘experimentally’, especially classics. Being a traditionalist and a supporter of theatrical illusion, he attacked Brecht’s model of epic performance, glorifying ”the process of actor transformation”, although he emphasised that it doesn’t have to ”concern only reality.” He provoked, irritated – and taught, which can be confirmed by the fact that his books about theatre are still widely read nowadays.","PeriodicalId":34769,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Historicolitteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20811853.18.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tadeusz Kudliński remained in the memory of Cracovians, above all, as a theatre critic and the author of books dedicated to this topic, which have been republished many times. Serving the function of an educational mission, they combined a harmonious perspective of a historian, researcher, critic, polemicist and apologist, who was also a great story-teller. The role of a ‘theatre man’, which he assumed, also included contacts with amateur theatre, discussions with audience and cooperation with the Theatre Lovers Club. Views on art which had clashed in the preceding century, were clearly reflected in the monographs and collections of reviews written by the author, for whom the history of the theatre was, in fact, the history of drama. For years, Kudliński consistently carried out his ‘theatre lesson’. It revolved around numerous issues – from the description of various theatrical aesthetics, through the search for ‘a Polish style’ of performance, to the characterisation of experimental groups (e.g. Grotowski’s or student theatre). The critic placed experiment on the side of cultural life, on no account in the popular theatre, therefore, he criticised all Polish directors from the second half of the 20th century who staged ‘experimentally’, especially classics. Being a traditionalist and a supporter of theatrical illusion, he attacked Brecht’s model of epic performance, glorifying ”the process of actor transformation”, although he emphasised that it doesn’t have to ”concern only reality.” He provoked, irritated – and taught, which can be confirmed by the fact that his books about theatre are still widely read nowadays.
Tadeusz Kudliński一直留在克拉科夫人的记忆中,最重要的是,作为一个戏剧评论家和专门讨论这个话题的书籍的作者,这些书籍已被多次再版。他们服务于教育使命的功能,结合了历史学家,研究者,评论家,辩论家和辩护者的和谐视角,他也是一个伟大的故事讲述者。他所扮演的“戏剧人”的角色还包括与业余戏剧接触、与观众讨论以及与戏剧爱好者俱乐部合作。在上个世纪发生冲突的艺术观点,清楚地反映在作者所写的专著和评论集中,对他来说,剧院的历史实际上就是戏剧的历史。多年来,Kudliński一直在进行他的“戏剧课”。它围绕着许多问题-从各种戏剧美学的描述,通过寻找“波兰风格”的表演,到实验团体的特征(例如Grotowski的或学生剧院)。这位评论家把实验放在文化生活的一边,而不是在流行戏剧中,因此,他批评了20世纪下半叶所有波兰导演的“实验”,尤其是经典作品。作为一个传统主义者和戏剧幻觉的支持者,他攻击布莱希特的史诗表演模式,赞美“演员转变的过程”,尽管他强调它不必“只关注现实”。他的戏剧著作至今仍被广泛阅读,这一点可以从他的作品中得到证实。