Low hyperbaric bupivacaine doses for unilateral spinal anesthesia for open inguinal herniorrhaphy. a pilot study with 20 patients

L. E. Imbelloni
{"title":"Low hyperbaric bupivacaine doses for unilateral spinal anesthesia for open inguinal herniorrhaphy. a pilot study with 20 patients","authors":"L. E. Imbelloni","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2020.12.00438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Unilateral spinal anesthesia may have advantages over bilateral spinal anesthesia. Low doses of local anesthetic, slow injection speed and lateral position are facilitators to produce unilateral spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to perform inguinal hernia repair with unilateral spinal anesthesia and low doses of bupivacaine associated with morphine in a pilot study with 20 patients. Material and methods : Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine and 26G Quincke needle was induced in a prospective pilot study in 20 patients physical status ASA I-II submitted to inguinal hernia repair. Spinal puncture was performed with patients previously placed with the side to be operated on facing downward and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 80 µg of morphine were injected at 1 mL/30 s. Sensory and motor blocks (pinprick and 0 to 3 scores) were compared between operated and contralateral sides. Hemodynamic changes, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention were evaluated. Results : All 20 patients were operated on using the technique employed, with no need for supplementation with sedation or general anesthesia. Unilateral block was induced in 100% of patients at 15 minutes and the end of the surgery. There has been hemodynamic stability in all patients. Urinary retention occurred in 8 patients (40%), pruritus in 4 patients (20%) and nauseas and vomiting in 4 patients (20%). No patient has developed post dural puncture headache. Conclusion: This prospective pilot study with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (5mg) associated with morphine (80 µg) has provided predominantly unilateral block. Fifteen minutes were enough for blockade installation. Major unilateral spinal anesthesia advantages are hemodynamic stability, patients ’satisfaction and faster anesthetic recovery.","PeriodicalId":14916,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2020.12.00438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Unilateral spinal anesthesia may have advantages over bilateral spinal anesthesia. Low doses of local anesthetic, slow injection speed and lateral position are facilitators to produce unilateral spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to perform inguinal hernia repair with unilateral spinal anesthesia and low doses of bupivacaine associated with morphine in a pilot study with 20 patients. Material and methods : Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine and 26G Quincke needle was induced in a prospective pilot study in 20 patients physical status ASA I-II submitted to inguinal hernia repair. Spinal puncture was performed with patients previously placed with the side to be operated on facing downward and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 80 µg of morphine were injected at 1 mL/30 s. Sensory and motor blocks (pinprick and 0 to 3 scores) were compared between operated and contralateral sides. Hemodynamic changes, nausea and vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention were evaluated. Results : All 20 patients were operated on using the technique employed, with no need for supplementation with sedation or general anesthesia. Unilateral block was induced in 100% of patients at 15 minutes and the end of the surgery. There has been hemodynamic stability in all patients. Urinary retention occurred in 8 patients (40%), pruritus in 4 patients (20%) and nauseas and vomiting in 4 patients (20%). No patient has developed post dural puncture headache. Conclusion: This prospective pilot study with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (5mg) associated with morphine (80 µg) has provided predominantly unilateral block. Fifteen minutes were enough for blockade installation. Major unilateral spinal anesthesia advantages are hemodynamic stability, patients ’satisfaction and faster anesthetic recovery.
低剂量布比卡因用于单侧脊髓麻醉腹股沟切开疝修补术。一项有20名患者参与的初步研究
背景:单侧脊髓麻醉可能比双侧脊髓麻醉有优势。局麻剂量小、注射速度慢、侧卧位是产生单侧脊髓麻醉的促进因素。本研究的目的是对20例患者进行单侧脊髓麻醉和低剂量布比卡因联合吗啡的腹股沟疝修补术的初步研究。材料与方法:对20例身体状态ASA I-II的腹股沟疝修补患者进行前瞻性先导研究,采用0.5%布比卡因和26G昆克针诱导脊髓麻醉。术前患者面朝下放置脊柱穿刺,以1 mL/30 s的速度注射0.5%高压布比卡因5 mg +吗啡80µg。感觉和运动阻滞(针刺和0到3分)在手术侧和对侧之间进行比较。观察血流动力学变化、恶心呕吐、瘙痒和尿潴留。结果:20例患者均采用本方法进行手术,无需补充镇静或全身麻醉。100%的患者在15分钟和手术结束时发生单侧阻滞。所有患者血流动力学稳定。尿潴留8例(40%),瘙痒4例(20%),恶心呕吐4例(20%)。无患者出现硬脊膜穿刺后头痛。结论:这项前瞻性先导研究使用0.5%高压布比卡因(5mg)联合吗啡(80µg)提供了主要的单侧阻滞。15分钟就足够安装封锁线了。单侧脊髓麻醉的主要优点是血流动力学稳定,患者满意度高,麻醉恢复快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书