The Preston Cock, Adultery, Homophobia and the First Petition for Female Suffrage

Q3 Arts and Humanities
J. Belchem
{"title":"The Preston Cock, Adultery, Homophobia and the First Petition for Female Suffrage","authors":"J. Belchem","doi":"10.3828/transactions.170.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOriginally spurred by determination to bring the Manchester authorities to justice in the aftermath of the Peterloo massacre, Henry Hunt persisted in seeking to gain election for the popular constituency of Preston. Eventually successful in 1830, he entered parliament pledged to present every petition sent to him, including that from Mary Smith calling for female suffrage. Having provided a rational vindication of the rights of women, her petition descended into a diatribe against married men who indulged in homosexual acts to the despair of their suicidal wives. This was a thinly veiled reference to alleged goings on in the household of the radical journalist William Cobbett. This article seeks to place in context the allegations and subsequent heated controversy by examining the long-term relationship between Hunt and Cobbett, dating back to the early nineteenth century and their mutual conversion from loyalism to radicalism. Already strained by the longstanding animus of Cobbett’s wife towards Hunt on account of his adulterous domestic circumstances, the radical allies were increasingly at odds in the years after Peterloo, divided over political and personal issues in a bewildering and increasingly unrestrained manner. Jealous of Hunt’s electoral success at Preston and furious with his radical condemnation of the Reform Bill, Cobbett inveighed against the ‘Preston Cock’. Hunt responded in kind, repeating allegations soon taken up in Mary Smith’s petition. Historians have simply noted how the petition was greeted with derision, but as this article shows, it merits deeper study. An early milestone on the long journey to secure votes for women, Mary Smith’s petition reveals political, personal and sexual divisions in early nineteenth-century radicalism - over feminism, homosexuality and adultery - attitudes and prejudices which inhibited any decisive pre-Victorian advance beyond manhood suffrage. The article concludes with a postscript noting Hunt’s fall from favour as the Reform Bill was passed, losing his Preston seat in the first election under the new propertied franchise. He died shortly thereafter but was rehabilitated and revered a few years later by the Chartists. His presentation of the first petition for female suffrage has seemingly been lost from history.","PeriodicalId":35557,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/transactions.170.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Originally spurred by determination to bring the Manchester authorities to justice in the aftermath of the Peterloo massacre, Henry Hunt persisted in seeking to gain election for the popular constituency of Preston. Eventually successful in 1830, he entered parliament pledged to present every petition sent to him, including that from Mary Smith calling for female suffrage. Having provided a rational vindication of the rights of women, her petition descended into a diatribe against married men who indulged in homosexual acts to the despair of their suicidal wives. This was a thinly veiled reference to alleged goings on in the household of the radical journalist William Cobbett. This article seeks to place in context the allegations and subsequent heated controversy by examining the long-term relationship between Hunt and Cobbett, dating back to the early nineteenth century and their mutual conversion from loyalism to radicalism. Already strained by the longstanding animus of Cobbett’s wife towards Hunt on account of his adulterous domestic circumstances, the radical allies were increasingly at odds in the years after Peterloo, divided over political and personal issues in a bewildering and increasingly unrestrained manner. Jealous of Hunt’s electoral success at Preston and furious with his radical condemnation of the Reform Bill, Cobbett inveighed against the ‘Preston Cock’. Hunt responded in kind, repeating allegations soon taken up in Mary Smith’s petition. Historians have simply noted how the petition was greeted with derision, but as this article shows, it merits deeper study. An early milestone on the long journey to secure votes for women, Mary Smith’s petition reveals political, personal and sexual divisions in early nineteenth-century radicalism - over feminism, homosexuality and adultery - attitudes and prejudices which inhibited any decisive pre-Victorian advance beyond manhood suffrage. The article concludes with a postscript noting Hunt’s fall from favour as the Reform Bill was passed, losing his Preston seat in the first election under the new propertied franchise. He died shortly thereafter but was rehabilitated and revered a few years later by the Chartists. His presentation of the first petition for female suffrage has seemingly been lost from history.
普雷斯顿公鸡,通奸,同性恋恐惧症和第一次女性选举权请愿书
在彼得卢大屠杀后,亨利·亨特(Henry Hunt)决心将曼彻斯特当局绳之以法,他坚持寻求在普雷斯顿(Preston)这个受欢迎的选区赢得选举。1830年,他最终获得了成功,他进入议会时承诺将呈递他收到的每一份请愿书,包括玛丽·史密斯要求女性选举权的请愿书。在为妇女的权利提供了合理的辩护之后,她的请愿沦落为对那些沉溺于同性恋行为的已婚男人的诽谤,这些男人让他们自杀的妻子感到绝望。这几乎是暗指激进记者威廉·科贝特(William Cobbett)家中据称发生的事情。本文试图通过考察亨特和科贝特之间的长期关系,以及他们从忠诚主义到激进主义的相互转变,将这些指控和随后的激烈争议置于背景中。科贝特的妻子因为亨特通奸的家庭环境而长期对他怀有敌意,这已经使他们关系紧张,在彼得卢之后的几年里,这对激进的盟友的分歧越来越大,在政治和个人问题上的分歧令人困惑,而且越来越不受约束。科贝特嫉妒亨特在普雷斯顿的选举成功,并对他对改革法案的激进谴责感到愤怒,他猛烈抨击了“普雷斯顿公鸡”。亨特以牙还牙,重复了玛丽·史密斯在请愿书中提出的指控。历史学家只是注意到请愿书是如何受到嘲笑的,但正如本文所示,它值得更深入的研究。玛丽·史密斯的请愿书是争取妇女选举权的漫长旅程中的一个早期里程碑,它揭示了19世纪早期激进主义在政治、个人和性别方面的分歧——对女权主义、同性恋和通奸的态度和偏见——这些态度和偏见阻碍了维多利亚时代之前任何超越成年选举权的决定性进展。文章以附言结尾,指出亨特在改革法案通过后失宠,在新财产特许经营权下的第一次选举中失去了他在普雷斯顿的席位。此后不久,他去世了,但几年后,他被宪章派恢复名誉并受到尊敬。他提交的第一份争取女性选举权的请愿书似乎已经从历史中消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信