{"title":"Re-evaluating the importance of discourse-embedding for specificational and predicative clauses","authors":"Wout Van Praet","doi":"10.1075/PRAG.20053.VAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper studies the discourse-embedding of specificational clauses, in contrast with predicative ones. Specificational\n clauses – which express a variable – value relation – are assumed to have a ‘fixed’ information structure. This follows from the widespread\n definition of information structure in terms of a presupposition – focus contrast, which is often conflated with the variable – value\n contrast, on the one hand, and with a given – new contrast, on the other. Against these conflations, this study demonstrates that the\n specification is a separate layer of meaning, which not only shows variation in terms of focus-marking (Van Praet and O’Grady 2018), but also in terms of its embedding in specific contexts of use. These findings urge us to revisit not\n only the basis for distinguishing specificational clauses from predicative ones, but also to separate out the different layers of coded and\n pragmatic meaning that have been conflated under the header of ‘information structure’.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/PRAG.20053.VAN","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper studies the discourse-embedding of specificational clauses, in contrast with predicative ones. Specificational
clauses – which express a variable – value relation – are assumed to have a ‘fixed’ information structure. This follows from the widespread
definition of information structure in terms of a presupposition – focus contrast, which is often conflated with the variable – value
contrast, on the one hand, and with a given – new contrast, on the other. Against these conflations, this study demonstrates that the
specification is a separate layer of meaning, which not only shows variation in terms of focus-marking (Van Praet and O’Grady 2018), but also in terms of its embedding in specific contexts of use. These findings urge us to revisit not
only the basis for distinguishing specificational clauses from predicative ones, but also to separate out the different layers of coded and
pragmatic meaning that have been conflated under the header of ‘information structure’.
本文研究了具体从句与谓语从句的语篇嵌入。说明子句——表达变量值关系——被认为具有“固定”的信息结构。这是根据预设焦点对比对信息结构的广泛定义而来的,这通常与一方面的可变值对比和另一方面的给定新对比相混淆。针对这些合并,本研究表明,规范是一个单独的意义层,它不仅在焦点标记方面表现出变化(Van Praet and O’grady 2018),而且在特定使用上下文的嵌入方面也表现出变化。这些发现不仅促使我们重新审视区分具体从句和谓语从句的基础,而且还促使我们区分被合并在“信息结构”标题下的编码和语用意义的不同层次。