Status and Patients Satisfaction Attended at Emergency Department of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Dhaka City

K. Akhtar, M. Rashid, K. Akhtar, A. Siddika, S. S. Siddika
{"title":"Status and Patients Satisfaction Attended at Emergency Department of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Dhaka City","authors":"K. Akhtar, M. Rashid, K. Akhtar, A. Siddika, S. S. Siddika","doi":"10.3329/JCAMR.V6I1.40786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emergency department is one of the most important parts of a hospital which is the point of major public health interest. \nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to find out the existing facilities of emergency department, to assess the satisfaction of patients and health care providers on emergency services. \nMethod: This cross-sectional study was carried out at emergency department of Mugda Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2017 to June 2017 for a period of six (06) months. Research instruments were semi structured questionnaire. Existing facilities at emergency department were assessed by check list which was adopted from Table of Equipment (TOE) by Directorate General of Health Service (DGHS) and satisfaction level was categorized as good and bad. Face to face interview was taken from emergency patients and health care providers attending in emergency unit. \nResult: A total of 75 samples of respondents were selected purposively. Most of the respondents (30.0%) were in 26 to 35 years age group. According to their education level, 24(48.0%) were illiterate. Most of the respondents (76.0%) were attended to emergency unit by walking; however 48(96.0%) respondents attended by health care providers immediately. Half of the patients (50.0%) buy drugs from local dispensary and investigation in hospital was also done by half of the patients. After reaching at emergency, maximum patients 25(50.0%) waited for 1 to 5 minutes for receiving medical attention and mean waiting time was 10.14 minutes. Overall satisfactory level at emergency unit was good 23(46.0%) and bad 27(54.0%) (p<0.0001). \nConclusion: Numbers of potential barriers influence the patients’ satisfaction. Periodic patient satisfaction survey should be institutionalized to provide feedback for continuous quality improvement. \nJournal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2019;6(1):53-58","PeriodicalId":15413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JCAMR.V6I1.40786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Emergency department is one of the most important parts of a hospital which is the point of major public health interest. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to find out the existing facilities of emergency department, to assess the satisfaction of patients and health care providers on emergency services. Method: This cross-sectional study was carried out at emergency department of Mugda Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2017 to June 2017 for a period of six (06) months. Research instruments were semi structured questionnaire. Existing facilities at emergency department were assessed by check list which was adopted from Table of Equipment (TOE) by Directorate General of Health Service (DGHS) and satisfaction level was categorized as good and bad. Face to face interview was taken from emergency patients and health care providers attending in emergency unit. Result: A total of 75 samples of respondents were selected purposively. Most of the respondents (30.0%) were in 26 to 35 years age group. According to their education level, 24(48.0%) were illiterate. Most of the respondents (76.0%) were attended to emergency unit by walking; however 48(96.0%) respondents attended by health care providers immediately. Half of the patients (50.0%) buy drugs from local dispensary and investigation in hospital was also done by half of the patients. After reaching at emergency, maximum patients 25(50.0%) waited for 1 to 5 minutes for receiving medical attention and mean waiting time was 10.14 minutes. Overall satisfactory level at emergency unit was good 23(46.0%) and bad 27(54.0%) (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Numbers of potential barriers influence the patients’ satisfaction. Periodic patient satisfaction survey should be institutionalized to provide feedback for continuous quality improvement. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2019;6(1):53-58
达喀市某三级医院急诊科就诊现状与患者满意度
背景:急诊科是医院最重要的组成部分之一,是公共卫生的重要关注点。目的:了解急诊科现有设施,评估患者和医护人员对急诊科服务的满意度。方法:本横断面研究于2017年1月至2017年6月在孟加拉国达卡Mugda医学院急诊科进行,为期6(06)个月。研究工具为半结构化问卷。根据卫生服务总局(DGHS)从设备表(TOE)中采用的检查清单对急诊科现有设施进行了评估,并将满意度分为好和差。对急诊病人和在急诊就诊的医护人员进行了面对面访谈。结果:有目的地选取了75个被调查者样本。大多数受访者(30.0%)年龄在26至35岁之间。按受教育程度划分,文盲24人(48.0%)。大多数受访者(76.0%)以步行方式前往急诊室;然而,48名(96.0%)应答者立即得到卫生保健提供者的诊治。半数患者(50.0%)从当地药房购买药品,半数患者也到医院进行过调查。到达急诊后等待1 ~ 5分钟的患者最多25例(50.0%),平均等待时间为10.14分钟。急诊总满意度为好23例(46.0%),差27例(54.0%)(p<0.0001)。结论:潜在障碍的数量影响患者的满意度。定期的患者满意度调查应制度化,为持续的质量改进提供反馈。现代医学研究进展,2019;6(1):53-58
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信