Is exposure therapy outcome affected by a monitoring coping style?

Peter Muris , Peter J de Jong , Harald Merckelbach , Florence van Zuuren
{"title":"Is exposure therapy outcome affected by a monitoring coping style?","authors":"Peter Muris ,&nbsp;Peter J de Jong ,&nbsp;Harald Merckelbach ,&nbsp;Florence van Zuuren","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of <span>Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989)</span> that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 291-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390014S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989) that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.

暴露治疗的结果是否受到监控应对方式的影响
在本研究中,36例蜘蛛恐惧症患者接受了一次体内暴露治疗。调查了监控(信息寻求)应对方式是否影响治疗结果。总的来说,治疗似乎非常成功。然而,在一周的随访中发现监测与较大的复发有关。这一发现与Steketee, Bransfield, Miller和Foa(1989)的早期研究相冲突,该研究表明,与钝器(信息回避者)相比,监视器(信息寻求者)的治疗结果更好。对看似矛盾的结果的潜在解释进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信