Analysis of the AC/A ratio in myopia patients in relation to spectacles and soft contact lenses

D. Pandurangaiah, Dr. GM Pradeep Kumar
{"title":"Analysis of the AC/A ratio in myopia patients in relation to spectacles and soft contact lenses","authors":"D. Pandurangaiah, Dr. GM Pradeep Kumar","doi":"10.33545/26638266.2021.v3.i1b.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare accommodative convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio when Myopic patient changes from Spectacles to Contact lenses. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study group of 50 subjects and Myopic error from -0.75DS to - 6.00DS. The AC/A ratio was measured by two methods; the heterophoria method and the gradient method. Gradient method was measured by plus and minus Lenses technique. Heterophoria in near and distance was measured to calculate heterophoria method. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used to compare between two methods p value < 0.05. Result s : The mean AC/A ratio in Gradient method when using Soft Contact Lenses in comparison to Spectacles was: with+3(2.21, 2.24), and with-3(1.51,150) respectively. Although the AC/A ratio was less in amount with +3D lens in near and more in distance with -3D lens as compared to Spectacles, there were no significant differences found between the two (P:0.285 and P:0.317 respectively). The means of AC/A ratio as calculated by Heterophoria method was increased with soft contact lenses (5.97) as compared to spectacles (5.96) with no significant difference p: 0.317 Conclusion: No significant difference has been found for myope when changing from spectacles to contact lenses.","PeriodicalId":14021,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26638266.2021.v3.i1b.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare accommodative convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio when Myopic patient changes from Spectacles to Contact lenses. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study group of 50 subjects and Myopic error from -0.75DS to - 6.00DS. The AC/A ratio was measured by two methods; the heterophoria method and the gradient method. Gradient method was measured by plus and minus Lenses technique. Heterophoria in near and distance was measured to calculate heterophoria method. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used to compare between two methods p value < 0.05. Result s : The mean AC/A ratio in Gradient method when using Soft Contact Lenses in comparison to Spectacles was: with+3(2.21, 2.24), and with-3(1.51,150) respectively. Although the AC/A ratio was less in amount with +3D lens in near and more in distance with -3D lens as compared to Spectacles, there were no significant differences found between the two (P:0.285 and P:0.317 respectively). The means of AC/A ratio as calculated by Heterophoria method was increased with soft contact lenses (5.97) as compared to spectacles (5.96) with no significant difference p: 0.317 Conclusion: No significant difference has been found for myope when changing from spectacles to contact lenses.
近视患者配戴眼镜与软性隐形眼镜的AC/A比值分析
目的:比较近视患者配戴眼镜与隐形眼镜时的调节收敛与调节(AC/A)比。方法:采用前瞻性、横断面研究,50名受试者,近视误差在-0.75 ~ - 6.00DS之间。采用两种方法测量AC/A比值;暗差法和梯度法。梯度法采用正负透镜法测量。测量近处和远处的暗差,计算暗差法。两种方法间比较采用Wilcoxon sign rank检验,p值< 0.05。结果:与普通眼镜相比,梯度法使用软性隐形眼镜时的平均AC/A比分别为+3(2.21,2.24)和-3(1.51,150)。虽然与Spectacles相比,+3D镜头近处的AC/A比较少,而-3D镜头远处的AC/A比较多,但两者之间无显著差异(P分别为0.285和0.317)。软质隐形眼镜的AC/A比值平均值(5.97)高于普通眼镜(5.96),p值为0.317,差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信