Rent-Seeking by Rent Concession: An Analysis of Rent-Free Periods in the Seoul Office Market

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
K. Ryu, Hyung Min Kim
{"title":"Rent-Seeking by Rent Concession: An Analysis of Rent-Free Periods in the Seoul\n Office Market","authors":"K. Ryu, Hyung Min Kim","doi":"10.53383/100333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rent-free periods (RFPs) have been used in property markets worldwide especially\n during economic downturns as a discount pricing strategy in marketing. However, this\n research study proposes that RFPs play a role in increasing or, at least, sustaining\n face rent that can be reflected in the property price. This study focuses on the Korean\n office market which has experienced growing vacancy rates since the global financial\n crisis possibly leading to a decrease in effective rent with greater RFP incentives. In\n this period, face rent has increased as offering extended RFPs. Hence, high vacant rates\n with high face rent have been observed, which is seemingly contradictory against the\n commonly known rent-vacancy negative relationship. This research analyses the rent,\n transaction prices and RFPs during 2003 – 2017 in the Seoul office market. The findings\n reveal that positive future anticipations of owners and investors are reflected in\n extended RFPs to sustain and increase face rent that will eventually lead to higher\n property transaction prices. The role of RFPs is not effective in attracting tenants as\n a marketing tool. Instead, professionals, including investors/buyers, owners/sellers and\n real estate agencies, have been doing rent-seeking by offering rent recessions in the\n Seoul office market.","PeriodicalId":44050,"journal":{"name":"International Real Estate Review","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Real Estate Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53383/100333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rent-free periods (RFPs) have been used in property markets worldwide especially during economic downturns as a discount pricing strategy in marketing. However, this research study proposes that RFPs play a role in increasing or, at least, sustaining face rent that can be reflected in the property price. This study focuses on the Korean office market which has experienced growing vacancy rates since the global financial crisis possibly leading to a decrease in effective rent with greater RFP incentives. In this period, face rent has increased as offering extended RFPs. Hence, high vacant rates with high face rent have been observed, which is seemingly contradictory against the commonly known rent-vacancy negative relationship. This research analyses the rent, transaction prices and RFPs during 2003 – 2017 in the Seoul office market. The findings reveal that positive future anticipations of owners and investors are reflected in extended RFPs to sustain and increase face rent that will eventually lead to higher property transaction prices. The role of RFPs is not effective in attracting tenants as a marketing tool. Instead, professionals, including investors/buyers, owners/sellers and real estate agencies, have been doing rent-seeking by offering rent recessions in the Seoul office market.
租金优惠的寻租行为——对首尔写字楼市场免租期的分析
免租期(rfp)已在全球房地产市场中使用,特别是在经济衰退期间,作为营销中的折扣定价策略。然而,这项研究表明,rfp在增加或至少维持租金方面发挥了作用,这可以反映在房地产价格上。这项研究的重点是韩国写字楼市场,自全球金融危机以来,韩国写字楼的空置率一直在上升,这可能导致RFP激励力度加大,导致有效租金下降。在此期间,由于提供延长的rfp,面租增加了。因此,观察到高空置率和高面租金,这似乎与众所周知的租金-空置负相关关系相矛盾。本研究分析了2003 ~ 2017年首尔写字楼市场的租金、交易价格和rfp。调查结果显示,业主和投资者对未来的积极预期反映在延长的rfp中,以维持和增加面租金,最终导致更高的房地产交易价格。作为一种营销工具,rfp在吸引租户方面的作用并不有效。相反,包括投资者/买家、业主/卖家和房地产中介在内的专业人士,通过在首尔写字楼市场提供租金衰退来进行寻租。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信