Infection risk in sexual contacts of syphilis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Johanna Denman, James Hodson, Kaveh Manavi
{"title":"Infection risk in sexual contacts of syphilis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Johanna Denman, James Hodson, Kaveh Manavi","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Current guidelines recommend offering epidemiological treatment to asymptomatic contacts of early syphilis. This is on the expectation that up to 60% of sexual contacts of patients with syphilis will be infected. However, the evidence for this figure is sparse. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, to estimate the proportion of sexual contacts of syphilis that are infected with syphilis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two electronic databases (Medline and Embase) were reviewed in March 2021, to identify studies that reported rates of infection in sexual contacts of syphilis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,051 Embase and 1,828 Medline articles identified, 32 were included in the meta-analysis. In total 36,397 contacts were tested. The proportion of contacts infected varied across the studies, ranging from 10.7% to 97.5%, resulting in considerable heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=98.5%). Pooling the studies gave an estimated proportion of infected contacts of 32.6% (95% confidence interval: 26.2% - 39.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of infection in sexual contacts of syphilis reported in the literature is highly variable, with a pooled estimate of 32.6%. This will help guide decisions regarding epidemiological treatment of sexual contacts of patients with syphilis. These decisions are increasingly important in this era of antibiotic resistance, with increasing emphasis being placed on antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":77413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of infection control : the official journal of the Community & Hospital Infection Control Association-Canada = Revue canadienne de prevention des infections","volume":"97 1","pages":"760-769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of infection control : the official journal of the Community & Hospital Infection Control Association-Canada = Revue canadienne de prevention des infections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Current guidelines recommend offering epidemiological treatment to asymptomatic contacts of early syphilis. This is on the expectation that up to 60% of sexual contacts of patients with syphilis will be infected. However, the evidence for this figure is sparse. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, to estimate the proportion of sexual contacts of syphilis that are infected with syphilis.

Methods: Two electronic databases (Medline and Embase) were reviewed in March 2021, to identify studies that reported rates of infection in sexual contacts of syphilis.

Results: Of 3,051 Embase and 1,828 Medline articles identified, 32 were included in the meta-analysis. In total 36,397 contacts were tested. The proportion of contacts infected varied across the studies, ranging from 10.7% to 97.5%, resulting in considerable heterogeneity (I2=98.5%). Pooling the studies gave an estimated proportion of infected contacts of 32.6% (95% confidence interval: 26.2% - 39.7%).

Conclusions: The risk of infection in sexual contacts of syphilis reported in the literature is highly variable, with a pooled estimate of 32.6%. This will help guide decisions regarding epidemiological treatment of sexual contacts of patients with syphilis. These decisions are increasingly important in this era of antibiotic resistance, with increasing emphasis being placed on antimicrobial stewardship.

梅毒性接触的感染风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:目前的指南建议对无症状早期梅毒接触者提供流行病学治疗。这是基于高达60%的梅毒患者的性接触将被感染的预期。然而,这一数字的证据很少。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以估计梅毒性接触者感染梅毒的比例。方法:于2021年3月对两个电子数据库(Medline和Embase)进行回顾,以确定报告梅毒性接触感染率的研究。结果:在3051篇Embase文章和1828篇Medline文章中,32篇被纳入meta分析。共对36397名接触者进行了检测。各研究中接触者感染的比例各不相同,从10.7%到97.5%不等,造成相当大的异质性(I2=98.5%)。综合这些研究,估计感染接触者的比例为32.6%(95%可信区间:26.2% - 39.7%)。结论:文献中报道的性接触者感染梅毒的风险变化很大,汇总估计为32.6%。这将有助于指导有关梅毒患者性接触的流行病学治疗的决策。在这个抗生素耐药的时代,这些决定越来越重要,人们越来越重视抗菌素管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信