right under our noses: the postponement of children's political equality and the NOW

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Haynes, K. Murris
{"title":"right under our noses: the postponement of children's political equality and the NOW","authors":"J. Haynes, K. Murris","doi":"10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2021.55060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Responding to the invitation of this special issue of Childhood and Philosophy this paper considers the ethos of facilitation in philosophical enquiry with children, and the spatial-temporal order of the community of enquiry. Within the Philosophy with Children movement, there are differences of thinking and practice on ‘facilitation’ in communities of philosophical enquiry, and we suggest that these have profound implications for the political agency of children. Facilitation can be enacted as a chronological practice of progress and development that works against child, in terms of political agency. This paper theorises practices of facilitation grounded in philosophies of childhood that assume listening to child/ren as equals, as already able to philosophise, and against sameness. We explore the political and ethical implications of the radical posthumanist reconfiguration of the ‘zipped’ body in the light of including the disciplinary, imaginative and enabling energies of chronological time through the concept now/ness.  We shift from ethics to ethos, and from ‘zipped’ to ‘unzipped’ bodies, through the notion of affect to explore the temporal and spatial dimensions of facilitation in Philosophy with Children and children’s political agency. We re-turn to David McKee’s Not Now Bernard (1980), getting ‘inside the text’, and attending to the postponement of equality in Philosophy with Children.","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2021.55060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Responding to the invitation of this special issue of Childhood and Philosophy this paper considers the ethos of facilitation in philosophical enquiry with children, and the spatial-temporal order of the community of enquiry. Within the Philosophy with Children movement, there are differences of thinking and practice on ‘facilitation’ in communities of philosophical enquiry, and we suggest that these have profound implications for the political agency of children. Facilitation can be enacted as a chronological practice of progress and development that works against child, in terms of political agency. This paper theorises practices of facilitation grounded in philosophies of childhood that assume listening to child/ren as equals, as already able to philosophise, and against sameness. We explore the political and ethical implications of the radical posthumanist reconfiguration of the ‘zipped’ body in the light of including the disciplinary, imaginative and enabling energies of chronological time through the concept now/ness.  We shift from ethics to ethos, and from ‘zipped’ to ‘unzipped’ bodies, through the notion of affect to explore the temporal and spatial dimensions of facilitation in Philosophy with Children and children’s political agency. We re-turn to David McKee’s Not Now Bernard (1980), getting ‘inside the text’, and attending to the postponement of equality in Philosophy with Children.
就在我们眼皮底下:推迟儿童的政治平等和现在
应《童年与哲学》特刊的邀请,本文考虑了儿童哲学探究中的促进精神,以及探究共同体的时空秩序。在“与儿童一起的哲学”运动中,在哲学探究的社区中,对“促进”的思考和实践存在差异,我们认为这些对儿童的政治代理具有深远的影响。就政治机构而言,促进可以作为对儿童不利的进步和发展的按时间顺序进行的实践。本文将基于儿童哲学的促进实践理论化,该哲学假设倾听儿童/ren是平等的,因为已经能够进行哲学思考,并且反对千篇一律。我们通过现在/本质的概念,探索激进的后人类主义对“压缩”身体的重新配置的政治和伦理含义,包括时间顺序时间的纪律、想象力和使能能量。我们从伦理转向精神,从“拉链”身体转向“松开拉链”身体,通过情感的概念探索儿童哲学和儿童政治机构的时间和空间维度。我们回到大卫·麦基(David McKee)的《现在不是伯纳德》(Not Now Bernard, 1980),进入“文本内部”,并在《与孩子的哲学》中关注平等的推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信