B. R. Goud, G. Reddy, V. Chandrika, M. Naidu, P. Sudhakar, K. Reddy, G. Sagar
{"title":"Effect of drip irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and economics of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.)","authors":"B. R. Goud, G. Reddy, V. Chandrika, M. Naidu, P. Sudhakar, K. Reddy, G. Sagar","doi":"10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water supply to agriculture especially rice will be affected in the future because of climate change and increased demand of water for non-agricultural use. To sustain rice production, focus should be on water saving rice production systems such as aerobic rice, which may further reduce water requirement when combined with drip irrigation. Hence, a field experiment to study the influence of drip irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and economics of aerobic rice was conducted at Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2019-20 and 2020-21. Four main plot treatments consisting of irrigation regimes based on pan evaporation i.e., drip irrigation at 1.25 Epan, 1.50 Epan, 1.75 Epan, 2.00 Epan and four sub plot treatments comprising of four doses of nitrogen i.e., 75 % RDN (90 kg N ha-1), 100 % RDN (120 kg N ha-1), 125 % RDN (150 kg N ha-1) and 150 % RDN (180 kg N ha-1) were tested in split plot design replicated thrice. Significantly higher plant height, number of tillers, yield attributes, grain yield, straw yield and gross returns were recorded with drip irrigation regime of 2.0 Epan over other irrigation regimes, but was comparable with drip irrigation at 1.75 Epan. While, higher net returns and B:C ratio were recorded with drip irrigation regime of 1.75 Epan which was at par with 2.0 Epan and 1.5 Epan. Aerobic rice grown with 180 kg N ha-1 proved to be superior with respect to plant height, number of tillers m-2, panicle weight, grain yield, straw yield, gross returns and net returns which was however comparable with 150 kg N ha-1 in case of panicle number, filled grains per panicle, test weight and B:C ratio. Among the interaction combinations, drip irrigation regime of 2.0 Epan along with 180 kg N ha-1 resulted in superior plant height, tillers m-2, yield attributes, grain yield, straw yield, gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio which was statistically at par with drip irrigation regime of 1.75 Epan along with 180 kg N ha-1 except in case of tiller number.","PeriodicalId":17736,"journal":{"name":"June 1","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"June 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water supply to agriculture especially rice will be affected in the future because of climate change and increased demand of water for non-agricultural use. To sustain rice production, focus should be on water saving rice production systems such as aerobic rice, which may further reduce water requirement when combined with drip irrigation. Hence, a field experiment to study the influence of drip irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and economics of aerobic rice was conducted at Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, during the rabi seasons of 2019-20 and 2020-21. Four main plot treatments consisting of irrigation regimes based on pan evaporation i.e., drip irrigation at 1.25 Epan, 1.50 Epan, 1.75 Epan, 2.00 Epan and four sub plot treatments comprising of four doses of nitrogen i.e., 75 % RDN (90 kg N ha-1), 100 % RDN (120 kg N ha-1), 125 % RDN (150 kg N ha-1) and 150 % RDN (180 kg N ha-1) were tested in split plot design replicated thrice. Significantly higher plant height, number of tillers, yield attributes, grain yield, straw yield and gross returns were recorded with drip irrigation regime of 2.0 Epan over other irrigation regimes, but was comparable with drip irrigation at 1.75 Epan. While, higher net returns and B:C ratio were recorded with drip irrigation regime of 1.75 Epan which was at par with 2.0 Epan and 1.5 Epan. Aerobic rice grown with 180 kg N ha-1 proved to be superior with respect to plant height, number of tillers m-2, panicle weight, grain yield, straw yield, gross returns and net returns which was however comparable with 150 kg N ha-1 in case of panicle number, filled grains per panicle, test weight and B:C ratio. Among the interaction combinations, drip irrigation regime of 2.0 Epan along with 180 kg N ha-1 resulted in superior plant height, tillers m-2, yield attributes, grain yield, straw yield, gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio which was statistically at par with drip irrigation regime of 1.75 Epan along with 180 kg N ha-1 except in case of tiller number.
由于气候变化和非农业用水需求的增加,未来农业特别是水稻的供水将受到影响。为了维持水稻生产,重点应放在节水水稻生产系统上,如需氧水稻,当与滴灌结合使用时,可进一步减少需水量。因此,在2019- 2020年和2020-21年的旱季,在安得拉邦的Tirupati进行了一项研究滴灌制度和氮水平对旱作水稻生长、产量和经济影响的田间试验。采用3次重复的分畦设计,试验了4个主要小区处理,包括基于蒸发皿的灌溉制度,即1.25、1.50、1.75、2.00 Epan滴灌和4个小小区处理,包括4个氮肥剂量,即75% RDN (90 kg N ha-1)、100% RDN (120 kg N ha-1)、125% RDN (150 kg N ha-1)和150% RDN (180 kg N ha-1)。2.0 Epan滴灌方案的株高、分蘖数、产量属性、籽粒产量、秸秆产量和总收益均显著高于其他灌溉方案,但与1.75 Epan滴灌方案相当。而1.75 Epan滴灌制度的净收益和B:C比率较高,与2.0 Epan和1.5 Epan相当。在株高、分蘖数、穗重、籽粒产量、秸秆产量、总收益和净收益方面,施用180 kg N hm -1的旱作水稻表现优异,但在穗数、每穗实粒数、试验重量和B:C比方面,施用150 kg N hm -1的旱作水稻与施用150 kg N hm -1的旱作水稻相当。在互作组合中,2.0 Epan + 180 kg N ha-1滴灌方案的株高、分蘖m-2、产量属性、籽粒产量、秸秆产量、总收益、净收益和B:C比均优于1.75 Epan + 180 kg N ha-1滴灌方案,但分蘖数不同。