On the question of original versus modified stability graph factors – a critical evaluation

IF 1.8 Q3 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
Y. Madenova, Fidelis T. Suorineni
{"title":"On the question of original versus modified stability graph factors – a critical evaluation","authors":"Y. Madenova, Fidelis T. Suorineni","doi":"10.1080/25726668.2020.1721996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Stability Graph has become an industry standard for open stope design. To date, there are two schools of thought on the use of the Original and Modified Stability Graph number factors. This paper is aimed at answering the question: Is there a difference between the Original and the modified stability number factors? To answer this question, a critical examination of the Extended Mathews and Modified Stability Graph databases was conducted to create a combined database of 316 datapoints. One version of the database was based on the original number factors, while a second was based on the modified factors. Logistic regression methods were applied to redefine the stope stability state boundaries. We concluded that differences between the stope stability states transition zones in the Stability Graphs are due to the differences in size of the databases rather than differences in the Original and Modified Stability Graph number factors.","PeriodicalId":44166,"journal":{"name":"Mining Technology-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Technology-Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25726668.2020.1721996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Stability Graph has become an industry standard for open stope design. To date, there are two schools of thought on the use of the Original and Modified Stability Graph number factors. This paper is aimed at answering the question: Is there a difference between the Original and the modified stability number factors? To answer this question, a critical examination of the Extended Mathews and Modified Stability Graph databases was conducted to create a combined database of 316 datapoints. One version of the database was based on the original number factors, while a second was based on the modified factors. Logistic regression methods were applied to redefine the stope stability state boundaries. We concluded that differences between the stope stability states transition zones in the Stability Graphs are due to the differences in size of the databases rather than differences in the Original and Modified Stability Graph number factors.
关于原始稳定性图因子与修正稳定性图因子的问题——一个关键性的评价
稳定性图已成为空场设计的行业标准。到目前为止,有两个学派的思想使用的原始和修改的稳定性图数因子。本文旨在回答这样一个问题:原始稳定性数因子与修改后的稳定性数因子之间是否存在差异?为了回答这个问题,对Extended Mathews和Modified Stability Graph数据库进行了严格的检查,创建了一个包含316个数据点的组合数据库。一个版本的数据库是基于原始的数字因子,而另一个版本是基于修改后的因子。采用Logistic回归方法重新定义了采场稳定状态边界。我们得出结论,稳定性图中采场稳定状态过渡带的差异是由于数据库大小的差异,而不是由于原始稳定图和修改稳定图数量因子的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信