In vivo assessment of antibacterial activity of Cassia sieberiana stem bark extracts on enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in Wister rats

V. Usanga, B. Ukwah, O. William, M. Kalu, J. Akpan, O. Azi, U. A. Ude
{"title":"In vivo assessment of antibacterial activity of Cassia sieberiana stem bark extracts on enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in Wister rats","authors":"V. Usanga, B. Ukwah, O. William, M. Kalu, J. Akpan, O. Azi, U. A. Ude","doi":"10.4314/ajcem.v23i3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The acceptance of traditional medicine as an alternative form of health care has led researchers to further investigate the antimicrobial and other health benefits of medicinal plants including Cassia sieberiana. The objective of this study is to assess the in vivo antibacterial effects of C. sieberiana stem bark extracts on infections caused by human and animal isolates of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) in Wister rats. \nMethodology: This in vivo study was designed for 21 days in 3 phases of 7 days each; adaptation, infection and treatment. Escherichia coli were isolated from aerobic cultures of human and cattle faecal samples and EHEC 0157 identified by serological typing using latex agglutination method. Aqueous and ethanol extracts of authenticated C. sieberiana stem bark, were prepared using standard method. Forty-five Wister rats were randomly divided into 9 groups (A-I) of 5 rats each. Rats in group A (uninfected with human or animal EHEC isolate and untreated) served as negative control  while rats in group B (infected with EHEC animal isolate and untreated) and group C (infected with EHEC human isolate and untreated) served as  positive controls. Rats in group C through group I were experimental groups that were either infected with human or animal EHEC isolate and  treated, or uninfected but treated with ethanol and aqueous extracts of C. sieberiana. During each of the study phase, faecal samples were collected  from the rats and processed for evaluation of EHEC count and to determine faecal occult blood. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for  Social Sciences, version 20.0 and categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-square, with significant value taken as p<0.05 \nResults: Three EHEC isolates (2 from cattle and 1 from human) were identified from 22 E. coli isolates cultured from cattle and human faecal  samples. Rats in group A (negative control) and those in group G (infected with EHEC human isolate and treated with ethanol extract), group H (not  infected but treated with aqueous extract) and group I (not infected but treated with ethanol extract) were faecal occult blood negative throughout  the study period. Rats in group B (infected with animal isolate of EHEC without treatment) were occult blood negative after infection on day 14 but  positive on day 21, while rats in group C (infected with human isolate of EHEC without treatment) were occult blood positive on day 14 but negative  on day 21. Rats in groups D, E and F infected with human and cattle EHEC isolates and treated, were faecal occult blood positive on day 14 but  negative on day 21, with high colony counts recorded, cleared within 7 days of treatment by both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of C. sieberiana.   \nConclusion: The findings of this study confirmed the antibacterial potentials of C. sieberiana stem bark against EHEC. The beneficial effects of this plant extract should be exploited for commercial medicinal purposes.","PeriodicalId":7415,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v23i3.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The acceptance of traditional medicine as an alternative form of health care has led researchers to further investigate the antimicrobial and other health benefits of medicinal plants including Cassia sieberiana. The objective of this study is to assess the in vivo antibacterial effects of C. sieberiana stem bark extracts on infections caused by human and animal isolates of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) in Wister rats. Methodology: This in vivo study was designed for 21 days in 3 phases of 7 days each; adaptation, infection and treatment. Escherichia coli were isolated from aerobic cultures of human and cattle faecal samples and EHEC 0157 identified by serological typing using latex agglutination method. Aqueous and ethanol extracts of authenticated C. sieberiana stem bark, were prepared using standard method. Forty-five Wister rats were randomly divided into 9 groups (A-I) of 5 rats each. Rats in group A (uninfected with human or animal EHEC isolate and untreated) served as negative control  while rats in group B (infected with EHEC animal isolate and untreated) and group C (infected with EHEC human isolate and untreated) served as  positive controls. Rats in group C through group I were experimental groups that were either infected with human or animal EHEC isolate and  treated, or uninfected but treated with ethanol and aqueous extracts of C. sieberiana. During each of the study phase, faecal samples were collected  from the rats and processed for evaluation of EHEC count and to determine faecal occult blood. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for  Social Sciences, version 20.0 and categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi-square, with significant value taken as p<0.05 Results: Three EHEC isolates (2 from cattle and 1 from human) were identified from 22 E. coli isolates cultured from cattle and human faecal  samples. Rats in group A (negative control) and those in group G (infected with EHEC human isolate and treated with ethanol extract), group H (not  infected but treated with aqueous extract) and group I (not infected but treated with ethanol extract) were faecal occult blood negative throughout  the study period. Rats in group B (infected with animal isolate of EHEC without treatment) were occult blood negative after infection on day 14 but  positive on day 21, while rats in group C (infected with human isolate of EHEC without treatment) were occult blood positive on day 14 but negative  on day 21. Rats in groups D, E and F infected with human and cattle EHEC isolates and treated, were faecal occult blood positive on day 14 but  negative on day 21, with high colony counts recorded, cleared within 7 days of treatment by both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of C. sieberiana.   Conclusion: The findings of this study confirmed the antibacterial potentials of C. sieberiana stem bark against EHEC. The beneficial effects of this plant extract should be exploited for commercial medicinal purposes.
决明子茎皮提取物对Wister大鼠肠出血性大肠杆菌感染的体内抑菌活性研究
背景:接受传统医学作为一种替代形式的保健,导致研究人员进一步研究药用植物的抗菌和其他健康益处,包括决明子。本研究的目的是评估大肠杆菌提取物对Wister大鼠肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)感染的体内抗菌作用。方法:本研究分为3期,每期7 d,共21 d;适应、感染和治疗。从人、牛粪便需氧培养物中分离出大肠杆菌,用乳胶凝集法进行血清分型鉴定出肠出血性大肠杆菌0157。采用标准方法制备了经鉴定的山参茎皮的水提物和乙醇提物。取Wister大鼠45只,随机分为9组(A-I),每组5只。A组大鼠(未感染人或动物肠出血性大肠杆菌分离株,未治疗)为阴性对照组,B组大鼠(感染动物肠出血性大肠杆菌分离株,未治疗)和C组大鼠(感染人肠出血性大肠杆菌分离株,未治疗)为阳性对照组。C组至I组为实验组,分别用分离的人或动物肠出血性大肠杆菌感染和处理,或未感染但用希伯氏大肠杆菌乙醇和水提取物处理。在每个研究阶段,收集大鼠的粪便样本,并对其进行处理,以评估肠出血性大肠杆菌计数并确定粪便隐血。使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 20.0对数据进行分析,分类变量采用Pearson’s卡方比较,显著值为p<0.05。结果:从22株牛和人粪便中分离出3株肠出血性大肠杆菌(2株牛,1株人)。在整个研究期间,A组(阴性对照)、G组(感染肠出血性大肠杆菌人分离株并用乙醇提取物处理)、H组(未感染但用水提取物处理)和I组(未感染但用乙醇提取物处理)的大鼠粪便隐血呈阴性。B组(感染EHEC动物分离株未处理)感染后第14天隐血阴性,第21天呈阳性;C组(感染EHEC人分离株未处理)感染后第14天隐血阳性,第21天呈阴性。D、E和F组大鼠感染人和牛肠出血性大肠杆菌分离株并治疗后,第14天的粪便隐血呈阳性,第21天呈阴性,记录到高菌落计数,在7天内被希伯氏大肠杆菌水提液和乙醇提取物清除。结论:本研究结果证实了茜草茎皮对肠出血性大肠杆菌的抑菌作用。这种植物提取物的有益作用应被开发用于商业药用目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信