Disrupting the Organizational Frontlines

IF 9.8 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Todd Arnold, Detelina Marinova
{"title":"Disrupting the Organizational Frontlines","authors":"Todd Arnold, Detelina Marinova","doi":"10.1177/10946705231175286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an introduction to a Journal of Service Research special issue in 2017, Singh et al. advanced the concept of studying the organizational frontline as a noun, signaling a conceptual shift from the paradigm of using “frontline” as a qualifying adjective to modify a phenomenon of interest (i.e., frontline employee, frontline tensions, or frontline knowledge). This special issue builds upon this concept by presenting papers that examine the frontline itself. Specifically, the focus of this special issue is to highlight changes that are impacting the organizational frontline, driven by both man and nature, that have sparked disruptions in frontline routine. A functioning society is based upon personal routine and interpersonal assumptions for guiding our behaviors (Collins 1981). That is, we all rely upon social norms to help guide us. What happens, though, when such assumptions and routines are disrupted? What triggers such disruptions, and what forms might such disruptions take? The purpose of this introduction to the special issue is to examine such key elements of disruption in relation to changes developing at the organizational frontline. This examination of disruption will then be linked to each of the articles found in the special issue. In order to accomplish this, we first begin with a discussion of what is meant by disruption. We then offer a definition of disruption in relation to the organizational frontline. Following this, we discuss the sources, severity, and speed elements associated with disruption at the organizational frontline. This allows for the categorization of disruption, which then facilitates the placement of research focused on disruption and changes in the organizational frontline. We conclude by looking forward to research needed across these domains.","PeriodicalId":48358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"303 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231175286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As an introduction to a Journal of Service Research special issue in 2017, Singh et al. advanced the concept of studying the organizational frontline as a noun, signaling a conceptual shift from the paradigm of using “frontline” as a qualifying adjective to modify a phenomenon of interest (i.e., frontline employee, frontline tensions, or frontline knowledge). This special issue builds upon this concept by presenting papers that examine the frontline itself. Specifically, the focus of this special issue is to highlight changes that are impacting the organizational frontline, driven by both man and nature, that have sparked disruptions in frontline routine. A functioning society is based upon personal routine and interpersonal assumptions for guiding our behaviors (Collins 1981). That is, we all rely upon social norms to help guide us. What happens, though, when such assumptions and routines are disrupted? What triggers such disruptions, and what forms might such disruptions take? The purpose of this introduction to the special issue is to examine such key elements of disruption in relation to changes developing at the organizational frontline. This examination of disruption will then be linked to each of the articles found in the special issue. In order to accomplish this, we first begin with a discussion of what is meant by disruption. We then offer a definition of disruption in relation to the organizational frontline. Following this, we discuss the sources, severity, and speed elements associated with disruption at the organizational frontline. This allows for the categorization of disruption, which then facilitates the placement of research focused on disruption and changes in the organizational frontline. We conclude by looking forward to research needed across these domains.
破坏组织的前线
作为2017年《服务研究杂志》特刊的导论,Singh等人提出了将组织前线作为名词来研究的概念,标志着从使用“前线”作为修饰感兴趣现象(即一线员工、一线紧张或一线知识)的限定形容词的范式的概念转变。本期特刊以这一概念为基础,介绍了研究前线本身的论文。具体来说,本期特刊的重点是强调在人为和自然的双重驱动下,影响组织第一线的变化,这些变化引发了第一线日常工作的中断。一个正常运转的社会是建立在指导我们行为的个人惯例和人际假设的基础上的(Collins 1981)。也就是说,我们都依赖社会规范来帮助指导我们。然而,当这些假设和惯例被打乱时会发生什么呢?是什么引发了这种破坏,这种破坏可能采取什么形式?这个特别问题的介绍的目的是检查在组织的前线发展变化的关系的破坏的关键因素。这种破坏的审查,然后将链接到每一篇文章中发现的特刊。为了做到这一点,我们首先讨论一下什么是破坏。然后,我们提供了与组织前线相关的中断的定义。接下来,我们将讨论与组织一线中断相关的来源、严重程度和速度因素。这允许对破坏进行分类,然后促进研究集中在组织前线的破坏和变化。最后,我们展望了跨这些领域所需的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Research (JSR) is recognized as the foremost service research journal globally. It is an indispensable resource for staying updated on the latest advancements in service research. With its accessible and applicable approach, JSR equips readers with the essential knowledge and strategies needed to navigate an increasingly service-oriented economy. Brimming with contributions from esteemed service professionals and scholars, JSR presents a wealth of articles that offer invaluable insights from academia and industry alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信