Color and Architecture: Walter Gropius and the Bauhaus Wall-Painting Workshop in Collaboration, 1922-1926

Morgan Ridler
{"title":"Color and Architecture: Walter Gropius and the Bauhaus Wall-Painting Workshop in Collaboration, 1922-1926","authors":"Morgan Ridler","doi":"10.16995/ah.8308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bauhaus was rooted in the idea of collaboration between artist and craftsman and the visual arts and architecture. No medium was more dependent on this spirit of cooperation than painting. Instead of easel painting, Walter Gropius, an architect and the founding director, promoted wall painting. He involved the school’s Wall-Painting Workshop in many of his private and official Bauhaus commissions, however these collaborative relationships were never easy. This essay examines four projects involving Gropius and Bauhaus wall painters from 1922 to 1926: the Municipal Theater and Haus Auerbach, both in Jena; Gropius’s office in Weimar; and the Bauhaus building in Dessau. In these projects, the role of paint and color in architectural form emerged as a key issue and point of conflict between painter and architect. Wassily Kandinsky' 1924 memo on wall painting made it clear that color could emerge with form (Entstehen), accompany form (Mitgehen), or be in opposition to form (Entgegengesetzte) - a group of terms that might describe both the effects of wall painting and the nature of collaboration. Early on, painters such as Oskar Schlemmer and Alfred Arndt envisioned dynamic and colorful paintings in architecture. However, these transformative effects threatened to dematerialize the architecture itself, and as the 1920s progressed, Gropius increasingly rejected bold pictorial wall paintings or lively painting schemes, opting instead for restrained subordinate color. By 1926, Hinnerk Scheper, the leader of the Wall-Painting Workshop, used paint to subtly and functionally accentuate and enhance buildings. In their collaborations with Gropius, the Bauhaus wall painters transitioned from independent cooperators to subordinated collaborators, and ultimately they developed an approach in which color yields to the demands of architecture.","PeriodicalId":12443,"journal":{"name":"Francosphères: Volume 10, Issue 2","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Francosphères: Volume 10, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.8308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bauhaus was rooted in the idea of collaboration between artist and craftsman and the visual arts and architecture. No medium was more dependent on this spirit of cooperation than painting. Instead of easel painting, Walter Gropius, an architect and the founding director, promoted wall painting. He involved the school’s Wall-Painting Workshop in many of his private and official Bauhaus commissions, however these collaborative relationships were never easy. This essay examines four projects involving Gropius and Bauhaus wall painters from 1922 to 1926: the Municipal Theater and Haus Auerbach, both in Jena; Gropius’s office in Weimar; and the Bauhaus building in Dessau. In these projects, the role of paint and color in architectural form emerged as a key issue and point of conflict between painter and architect. Wassily Kandinsky' 1924 memo on wall painting made it clear that color could emerge with form (Entstehen), accompany form (Mitgehen), or be in opposition to form (Entgegengesetzte) - a group of terms that might describe both the effects of wall painting and the nature of collaboration. Early on, painters such as Oskar Schlemmer and Alfred Arndt envisioned dynamic and colorful paintings in architecture. However, these transformative effects threatened to dematerialize the architecture itself, and as the 1920s progressed, Gropius increasingly rejected bold pictorial wall paintings or lively painting schemes, opting instead for restrained subordinate color. By 1926, Hinnerk Scheper, the leader of the Wall-Painting Workshop, used paint to subtly and functionally accentuate and enhance buildings. In their collaborations with Gropius, the Bauhaus wall painters transitioned from independent cooperators to subordinated collaborators, and ultimately they developed an approach in which color yields to the demands of architecture.
色彩与建筑:沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯和包豪斯壁画工作室合作,1922-1926
包豪斯根植于艺术家和工匠以及视觉艺术和建筑之间的合作理念。没有一种媒介比绘画更依赖于这种合作精神。建筑师兼创始人沃尔特•格罗皮乌斯(Walter Gropius)提倡的不是架上绘画,而是墙壁绘画。他在包豪斯的私人和官方委托中参与了学校的壁画工作室,然而这些合作关系从来都不容易。本文考察了格罗皮乌斯和包豪斯墙画家从1922年到1926年的四个项目:市政剧院和豪斯奥尔巴赫,都在耶拿;格罗皮乌斯在魏玛的办公室;以及德绍的包豪斯建筑。在这些项目中,油漆和颜色在建筑形式中的作用成为画家和建筑师之间的关键问题和冲突点。瓦西利·康定斯基1924年关于壁画的备忘录清楚地表明,颜色可以与形式一起出现(Entstehen),伴随形式(Mitgehen),或者与形式对立(Entgegengesetzte)——这一组术语可以描述壁画的效果和合作的本质。早期,像奥斯卡·施莱默(Oskar Schlemmer)和阿尔弗雷德·阿恩特(Alfred Arndt)这样的画家设想了建筑中动态和丰富多彩的绘画。然而,这些变革性的影响威胁着建筑本身的非物质化,随着20世纪20年代的发展,格罗皮乌斯越来越拒绝大胆的图案壁画或生动的绘画方案,而是选择了克制的附属色彩。到1926年,墙壁粉刷工作室的负责人欣纳克·谢珀(Hinnerk Scheper)使用油漆巧妙地突出和增强了建筑物的功能。在与格罗皮乌斯的合作中,包豪斯的墙画家从独立的合作者转变为从属的合作者,最终他们开发了一种使色彩屈服于建筑需求的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信