Falling from a Calling: Entitlement and the Social (De)Construction of Leader Identity

J. Humphreys, Stephanie S. Pane Haden, J. N. Davis
{"title":"Falling from a Calling: Entitlement and the Social (De)Construction of Leader Identity","authors":"J. Humphreys, Stephanie S. Pane Haden, J. N. Davis","doi":"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.oc.00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For much of my life I thought God and I were partners, and I was the senior partner. I freely admit that I have a colossal ego, and I have been so convinced that I am literally on a mission from God that I have often acted like a man with a messiah complex (Meredith & Doyle, 2012: 244).IntroductionThe turgid declaration shown above was made by James Meredith, the first known African American student to enroll at the University of Mississippi (Eagles, 2009). In recounting his life story, Meredith repeatedly describes his struggle for educational equality (and against White supremacy) as a \"mission from God\" (e.g., Meredith & Doyle, 2012: 10) and a \"divine responsibility\" (e.g., Meredith, 1966: 214). With the current upsurge of interest on callings (Dik & Duffy, 2012), we argue that an examination of the case of a historic leader whose belief and identity were underpinned by a sense of calling is warranted.Although research on the concept of being called to some meaningful undertaking has proliferated in recent years, scholars have largely ignored the potential failings that could also be associated with a sense of calling (Berkelaar & Buzzanell, 2015). Calls for studies that go beyond only positive frames are beginning to appear in the literature (e.g., Duffy & Dik, 2013). Specifically, Berkelaar and Buzzanell (2015: 16) recently argued for more focus on the problematic outcomes that might be associated with calling and the potential \"shortcomings\" associated with called individuals.In addition, calling can be an integral part of one's sense of identity (Dobrow, 2004), particularly leader identity (Markow & Klenke, 2005), because \"leadership is perhaps best understood as identity construction\" (Karp & Helgo, 2009: 892). Yet, while research has shown a connection between calling and identity the concepts have been related \"differently by different theorists, and there seems to be disagreement on whether calling precedes identity or identity precedes calling\" (Markow, 2007: 32).In any event, accepting the call to lead such a personally profound undertaking, and receiving the concomitant status associated with it, carries the risk of an excessive sense of entitlement (see Naumann, Minsky, & Sturman, 2002). Unfortunately, the extant research on entitlement is also inconsistent, undervalued in leadership inquiries beyond a trait perspective (Tomlinson, 2013), and missing from leader identity construction studies. Conducting documentary and archival research of James Meredith's historic integration of the University of Mississippi, we discovered that Meredith believed he had been called to the struggle for equality, eventually internalizing a leader identity consistent with his calling. However, we argue his entitlement beliefs ultimately undermined his leadership identity and inhibited his ability to effectively sustain the pursuit of that call. Accordingly, we analyzed the case of James Meredith to further explore the relationship between calling, leader identity, and entitlement.Historical ApproachNumerous researchers have endorsed the use of narrative studies to further explore processes of leader/follower exchange (e.g., Novicevic et al., 2011; Shamir, 2011) and identity construction (e.g., DeRue & Ashford, 2010; Humphreys et al., in press). Such elucidations from case studies can be particularly valuable when attempting to craft conceptual frameworks (de Jong, Higgins, & van Driel, 2015; Ketokivi & Choi, 2014; Morgan, 2012; Pane Haden, Diaz, Humphreys, & Hayek, 2013).Our historical method of researching the calling, beliefs, and outcomes associated with James Meredith's leadership involved the process of examining documentary (e.g., books - biographical and autobiographical, newspapers) and archival (e.g., letters, telegrams) data. Examinations of contextualized texts may allow researchers to uncover discernible undercurrents of leader beliefs (Shamir & Eilam, 2005) and identities (Hassard, 2012) and develop appropriate meanings from notable excerpts (Bevir, 2012). …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"60 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.oc.00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

For much of my life I thought God and I were partners, and I was the senior partner. I freely admit that I have a colossal ego, and I have been so convinced that I am literally on a mission from God that I have often acted like a man with a messiah complex (Meredith & Doyle, 2012: 244).IntroductionThe turgid declaration shown above was made by James Meredith, the first known African American student to enroll at the University of Mississippi (Eagles, 2009). In recounting his life story, Meredith repeatedly describes his struggle for educational equality (and against White supremacy) as a "mission from God" (e.g., Meredith & Doyle, 2012: 10) and a "divine responsibility" (e.g., Meredith, 1966: 214). With the current upsurge of interest on callings (Dik & Duffy, 2012), we argue that an examination of the case of a historic leader whose belief and identity were underpinned by a sense of calling is warranted.Although research on the concept of being called to some meaningful undertaking has proliferated in recent years, scholars have largely ignored the potential failings that could also be associated with a sense of calling (Berkelaar & Buzzanell, 2015). Calls for studies that go beyond only positive frames are beginning to appear in the literature (e.g., Duffy & Dik, 2013). Specifically, Berkelaar and Buzzanell (2015: 16) recently argued for more focus on the problematic outcomes that might be associated with calling and the potential "shortcomings" associated with called individuals.In addition, calling can be an integral part of one's sense of identity (Dobrow, 2004), particularly leader identity (Markow & Klenke, 2005), because "leadership is perhaps best understood as identity construction" (Karp & Helgo, 2009: 892). Yet, while research has shown a connection between calling and identity the concepts have been related "differently by different theorists, and there seems to be disagreement on whether calling precedes identity or identity precedes calling" (Markow, 2007: 32).In any event, accepting the call to lead such a personally profound undertaking, and receiving the concomitant status associated with it, carries the risk of an excessive sense of entitlement (see Naumann, Minsky, & Sturman, 2002). Unfortunately, the extant research on entitlement is also inconsistent, undervalued in leadership inquiries beyond a trait perspective (Tomlinson, 2013), and missing from leader identity construction studies. Conducting documentary and archival research of James Meredith's historic integration of the University of Mississippi, we discovered that Meredith believed he had been called to the struggle for equality, eventually internalizing a leader identity consistent with his calling. However, we argue his entitlement beliefs ultimately undermined his leadership identity and inhibited his ability to effectively sustain the pursuit of that call. Accordingly, we analyzed the case of James Meredith to further explore the relationship between calling, leader identity, and entitlement.Historical ApproachNumerous researchers have endorsed the use of narrative studies to further explore processes of leader/follower exchange (e.g., Novicevic et al., 2011; Shamir, 2011) and identity construction (e.g., DeRue & Ashford, 2010; Humphreys et al., in press). Such elucidations from case studies can be particularly valuable when attempting to craft conceptual frameworks (de Jong, Higgins, & van Driel, 2015; Ketokivi & Choi, 2014; Morgan, 2012; Pane Haden, Diaz, Humphreys, & Hayek, 2013).Our historical method of researching the calling, beliefs, and outcomes associated with James Meredith's leadership involved the process of examining documentary (e.g., books - biographical and autobiographical, newspapers) and archival (e.g., letters, telegrams) data. Examinations of contextualized texts may allow researchers to uncover discernible undercurrents of leader beliefs (Shamir & Eilam, 2005) and identities (Hassard, 2012) and develop appropriate meanings from notable excerpts (Bevir, 2012). …
从召唤中坠落:权利与领导者身份的社会建构
在我生命中的大部分时间里,我都认为上帝和我是搭档,而我是高级合伙人。我坦率地承认,我有一个巨大的自我,我一直相信我真的是在执行上帝的使命,以至于我经常表现得像一个有弥赛亚情结的人(Meredith & Doyle, 2012: 244)。上文所示的浮夸宣言是由詹姆斯·梅雷迪思(James Meredith)做出的,他是已知的第一个进入密西西比大学的非裔美国学生(Eagles, 2009)。在讲述他的人生故事时,梅雷迪思反复将他争取教育平等(以及反对白人至上主义)的斗争描述为“上帝的使命”(例如,梅雷迪思和多伊尔,2012:10)和“神圣的责任”(例如,梅雷迪思,1966:214)。随着当前对召唤的兴趣高涨(Dik & Duffy, 2012),我们认为对一位历史领袖的案例进行审查是有必要的,他的信仰和身份是由一种召唤感支撑的。尽管近年来关于被召唤去做一些有意义的事情的概念的研究激增,但学者们在很大程度上忽略了可能与召唤感相关的潜在失败(Berkelaar & Buzzanell, 2015)。文献中开始出现对超越积极框架的研究的呼吁(例如,Duffy & Dik, 2013)。具体而言,Berkelaar和Buzzanell(2015: 16)最近主张更多地关注可能与呼叫相关的问题结果以及与被呼叫个体相关的潜在“缺点”。此外,召唤可以是一个人的身份感的一个组成部分(Dobrow, 2004),特别是领导身份(Markow & Klenke, 2005),因为“领导也许是最好的理解为身份建设”(Karp & Helgo, 2009: 892)。然而,尽管研究显示了召唤和身份之间的联系,但“不同的理论家对这些概念的关联不同,而且似乎在召唤先于身份还是身份先于召唤的问题上存在分歧”(Markow, 2007: 32)。无论如何,接受领导这样一项个人意义深远的事业的召唤,并接受与之相关的伴随地位,会带来过度权利感的风险(见Naumann, Minsky, & Sturman, 2002)。不幸的是,现有的关于权利的研究也是不一致的,在领导力调查中被低估了,超出了特质视角(Tomlinson, 2013),并且在领导认同构建研究中缺失。通过对詹姆斯·梅雷迪思(James Meredith)融入密西西比大学(University of Mississippi)历史的文献和档案研究,我们发现梅雷迪思(Meredith)相信他是被召唤为平等而斗争的,最终内化了一种与他的召唤相一致的领袖身份。然而,我们认为他的权利信念最终削弱了他的领导身份,并抑制了他有效地坚持追求这一使命的能力。因此,我们以James Meredith为例,进一步探讨呼召、领导认同与权利之间的关系。历史方法许多研究人员支持使用叙事研究来进一步探索领导者/追随者交换的过程(例如,Novicevic等人,2011;Shamir, 2011)和身份建构(例如,DeRue & Ashford, 2010;Humphreys等人,出版中)。在试图构建概念框架时,案例研究中的这种说明可能特别有价值(de Jong, Higgins, & van Driel, 2015;Ketokivi & Choi, 2014;摩根,2012;Pane Haden, Diaz, Humphreys, & Hayek, 2013)。我们研究与詹姆斯·梅雷迪思领导相关的召唤、信仰和结果的历史方法包括检查文献(例如,书籍-传记和自传,报纸)和档案(例如,信件,电报)数据的过程。对语境化文本的检查可以让研究人员发现领导者信仰(Shamir & Eilam, 2005)和身份(Hassard, 2012)的明显暗流,并从值得注意的摘录(Bevir, 2012)中发展出适当的含义。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信