Problem-based learning and action learning in Ugandan universities

Jacinta Bwegyeme, J. Munene, James R. K. Kagaari, Geoffrey Bakunda
{"title":"Problem-based learning and action learning in Ugandan universities","authors":"Jacinta Bwegyeme, J. Munene, James R. K. Kagaari, Geoffrey Bakunda","doi":"10.4314/JSSD.V6I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to compare the action learning approach with the traditional didactic learning and establish the relationship between problem-based learning and action learning. We employed a quasi experiment where the Marquardt Action Learning model was combined with the constructivist theories of learning. The quasi experiment was composed of three groups, namely the treatment group (action learning group), the traditional group and the control group. To stimulate participant thought and reflection, a community of practice environment was created and just-in-time classes were conducted, based on the constructive theories of learning. Although the study involved various constructivist theories, the article concentrates on problem-based learning; hence, it is quiet about other constructivist theories. The results indicate significant differences between the action learning and traditional didactic learning. Furthermore, a significant relationship between problem-based learning and action learning was established. The robust strength of reflective practice and self-directed learning in the prediction of action learning is also highlighted. The findings can be utilised to design future training programmes in universities and other workplaces in order to equip workers with reflective practice and self-directed learning skills that are vital in solving workplace problems.","PeriodicalId":52757,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Science and Sustainable Development","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Science and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JSSD.V6I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the action learning approach with the traditional didactic learning and establish the relationship between problem-based learning and action learning. We employed a quasi experiment where the Marquardt Action Learning model was combined with the constructivist theories of learning. The quasi experiment was composed of three groups, namely the treatment group (action learning group), the traditional group and the control group. To stimulate participant thought and reflection, a community of practice environment was created and just-in-time classes were conducted, based on the constructive theories of learning. Although the study involved various constructivist theories, the article concentrates on problem-based learning; hence, it is quiet about other constructivist theories. The results indicate significant differences between the action learning and traditional didactic learning. Furthermore, a significant relationship between problem-based learning and action learning was established. The robust strength of reflective practice and self-directed learning in the prediction of action learning is also highlighted. The findings can be utilised to design future training programmes in universities and other workplaces in order to equip workers with reflective practice and self-directed learning skills that are vital in solving workplace problems.
乌干达大学的基于问题的学习和行动学习
本研究的目的是比较行动学习方法与传统的教学学习方法,并建立基于问题的学习与行动学习之间的关系。我们采用了一个准实验,将马夸特行动学习模型与建构主义学习理论相结合。准实验分为三组,即治疗组(行动学习组)、传统组和对照组。为了激发参与者的思考和反思,我们以建设性的学习理论为基础,创造了一个实践环境社区,并开展了即时课程。虽然研究涉及多种建构主义理论,但本文主要关注基于问题的学习;因此,对其他建构主义理论的研究较少。结果表明,行动学习与传统教学学习存在显著差异。此外,基于问题的学习与行动学习之间存在显著的关系。反思性实践和自主学习在预测行动学习中的强大力量也得到了强调。研究结果可以用来设计未来在大学和其他工作场所的培训计划,以使工人具备反思实践和自主学习技能,这对解决工作场所的问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信