Ahundzade’de Millet Fikrinin Oluşumunun Miroslav Hroch’un yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi

IF 0.2 4区社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES

Bilig Pub Date : 2021-07-05 DOI:10.12995/bilig.9803

O. Valiyev, B. Bezci

{"title":"Ahundzade’de Millet Fikrinin Oluşumunun Miroslav Hroch’un yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi","authors":"O. Valiyev, B. Bezci","doi":"10.12995/bilig.9803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Mirza Feteli Ahundzade is not a modern nationalist, he played an important role in the formation of the national movement in Azerbaijan. Miroslav Hroch’s theses about small nations make Ahundzade’s role in the national movement more understandable. Miroslav Hroch explained the nation-building process of “small nations” through the concept of “national movements” rather than “nationalism” and divided them into three phases. Hroch stressed that “small nations” completed their nation-building process through the “A”, “B”, “C” phases. In the first phase (A) they discovered their local/national language, phase (B) caused national agitation, and in the last phase (C) national movements got massification. According to this classification, Akhundzade will be considered within the first phase (A) of nation-building process of Tsarist Azerbaijan (1850-1920). Ahundzade writes works in folk language and he also uses language as a tool for public education and development. In this study, Akhundzade will be investigated in the context of his writings in folk language and its influence on the formation of national consciousness.","PeriodicalId":44387,"journal":{"name":"Bilig","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilig","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although Mirza Feteli Ahundzade is not a modern nationalist, he played an important role in the formation of the national movement in Azerbaijan. Miroslav Hroch’s theses about small nations make Ahundzade’s role in the national movement more understandable. Miroslav Hroch explained the nation-building process of “small nations” through the concept of “national movements” rather than “nationalism” and divided them into three phases. Hroch stressed that “small nations” completed their nation-building process through the “A”, “B”, “C” phases. In the first phase (A) they discovered their local/national language, phase (B) caused national agitation, and in the last phase (C) national movements got massification. According to this classification, Akhundzade will be considered within the first phase (A) of nation-building process of Tsarist Azerbaijan (1850-1920). Ahundzade writes works in folk language and he also uses language as a tool for public education and development. In this study, Akhundzade will be investigated in the context of his writings in folk language and its influence on the formation of national consciousness.

查看原文本刊更多论文

虽然Mirza Feteli Ahundzade不是现代民族主义者，但他在阿塞拜疆民族运动的形成中发挥了重要作用。米罗斯拉夫·赫罗什关于小国的论点使阿蒙扎德在民族运动中的作用更加容易理解。Miroslav Hroch通过“民族运动”而不是“民族主义”的概念来解释“小国”的国家建设过程，并将其分为三个阶段。Hroch强调，“小国”通过“A”、“B”、“C”三个阶段完成了国家建设过程。在第一阶段(A)，他们发现了自己的地方/民族语言;在第二阶段，他们掀起了全国性的骚动;在最后阶段(C)，民族运动得到了群众化。根据这一分类，Akhundzade将被视为沙皇阿塞拜疆(1850-1920)国家建设进程的第一阶段(A)。Ahundzade用民间语言写作，他也把语言作为公共教育和发展的工具。在本研究中，Akhundzade将在他的民间语言写作及其对民族意识形成的影响的背景下进行研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bilig AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： bilig aims to present the cultural riches as well as the historical and contemporary realities of the Turkic world within a scientific framework. It also aims to inform the public of scientific studies of international quality focusing on the Turkic World. bilig publishes articles that approach the current and historical problems of the Turkic world from a scientific perspective and propose solutions to these issues. Submissions to bilig should be original articles producing new and worthwhile ideas and perspectives or evaluating previous studies in the field. bilig also publishes essays introducing authors and works and announcing new and recent activities related to the Turkic world. An article to be published in bilig should not have been previously published or accepted for publication elsewhere. Papers presented at a conference or symposium may be accepted for publication if this is clearly indicated. bilig is published quarterly: Winter/January, Spring/April, Summer/July and Autumn/October. At the end of each year, an annual index is prepared and published in the Winter issue. Each issue is forwarded to subscribers, libraries and international indexing institutions within one month after its publication.