Deferred Income Annuity Purchases: Optimal Levels for Retirement Income Adequacy

Q3 Social Sciences
Jack L. VanDerhei
{"title":"Deferred Income Annuity Purchases: Optimal Levels for Retirement Income Adequacy","authors":"Jack L. VanDerhei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prospect of outliving retirement savings is a very real risk for many Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Yet, only a very small percentage of defined contribution (DC) and individual retirement account (IRA) balances are annuitized — and a significant percentage of defined benefit (DB) accruals have been taken as lump-sum distributions when the option was available.<br><br>Some believe that cost is an issue; Deferred Income Annuities (DIAs) are designed to reduce the probability of outliving savings by providing monthly benefits in the later stages of retirement. Because of their delayed payments, DIAs could be offered for a small fraction of the cost for a similar monthly benefit through an annuity that starts payments immediately at retirement. Many believe that the lower cost would at least partially mitigate retirees’ reluctance to give up control over a large portion of their DC and/or IRA balances at retirement age. <br><br>New research was prepared for this Issue Brief to explore how the probability of a “successful” retirement, measured by the EBRI Retirement Readiness Rating (RRR), varies with the percentage of the 401(k) balance that is used to purchase a DIA. Results are provided for all households (with a 401(k) balance) combined as well as by simulated age of death. The results are also provided by age-specific wage quartiles.<br><br>We find that, at current annuity rates, purchases of a DIA at age 65 deferring 20 years with no death benefits result in an overall improvement in RRR (for all ages of death combined) for DIA purchases equal to 5, 10, 15, and 20 percent of the 401(k) balance. However, there is an overall decrease in RRR for DIA purchases equal to 25 and 30 percent — due in part to the interaction with long-term care costs. If a pre-commencement death benefit is added to the DIA, there is an overall improvement in RRR for DIA purchases equal to 5, 10, and 15 percent of the 401(k) balance.<br><br>When the results are broken out by age at simulated death, we find overall decreases in RRR for those dying before benefits begin (ages 65–84) as well as for those dying soon after benefits begin (ages 85–89). For each of the groups living beyond age 89 we find an increase in RRR, and, as expected, the larger the percentage of 401(k) balance used to purchase a DIA, the larger the percentage increase in RRR. The results are significantly improved by adding a pre-commencement death benefit for those who die before benefits begin, but this is offset by larger decreases in RRR for those dying between ages 85 and 89 and smaller increases in RRR for those living beyond age 89.<br><br>The need for longevity protection is arguably less for those in the lowest wage quartile given their greater reliance on Social Security. We broke out the overall RRR changes by age-specific wage quartiles and found that in all but the smallest DIA purchase (5 percent of the 401(k) balance), households in the lowest age-specific wage quartiles experienced a decrease in RRR from the purchase of a DIA without a pre-commencement death benefit. However, households with higher wages had a much more positive experience, with those in the second age-specific wage quartile experiencing an increase in RRR for all purchases through the 20 percent value. Households in the third age-specific wage quartile experienced an increase in RRR for all purchases through the 25 percent value, and those in the highest age-specific wage quartile experienced an increase in RRR for all purchases simulated (through the 30 percent level).","PeriodicalId":39542,"journal":{"name":"Social Security Bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Security Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3309900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prospect of outliving retirement savings is a very real risk for many Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Yet, only a very small percentage of defined contribution (DC) and individual retirement account (IRA) balances are annuitized — and a significant percentage of defined benefit (DB) accruals have been taken as lump-sum distributions when the option was available.

Some believe that cost is an issue; Deferred Income Annuities (DIAs) are designed to reduce the probability of outliving savings by providing monthly benefits in the later stages of retirement. Because of their delayed payments, DIAs could be offered for a small fraction of the cost for a similar monthly benefit through an annuity that starts payments immediately at retirement. Many believe that the lower cost would at least partially mitigate retirees’ reluctance to give up control over a large portion of their DC and/or IRA balances at retirement age.

New research was prepared for this Issue Brief to explore how the probability of a “successful” retirement, measured by the EBRI Retirement Readiness Rating (RRR), varies with the percentage of the 401(k) balance that is used to purchase a DIA. Results are provided for all households (with a 401(k) balance) combined as well as by simulated age of death. The results are also provided by age-specific wage quartiles.

We find that, at current annuity rates, purchases of a DIA at age 65 deferring 20 years with no death benefits result in an overall improvement in RRR (for all ages of death combined) for DIA purchases equal to 5, 10, 15, and 20 percent of the 401(k) balance. However, there is an overall decrease in RRR for DIA purchases equal to 25 and 30 percent — due in part to the interaction with long-term care costs. If a pre-commencement death benefit is added to the DIA, there is an overall improvement in RRR for DIA purchases equal to 5, 10, and 15 percent of the 401(k) balance.

When the results are broken out by age at simulated death, we find overall decreases in RRR for those dying before benefits begin (ages 65–84) as well as for those dying soon after benefits begin (ages 85–89). For each of the groups living beyond age 89 we find an increase in RRR, and, as expected, the larger the percentage of 401(k) balance used to purchase a DIA, the larger the percentage increase in RRR. The results are significantly improved by adding a pre-commencement death benefit for those who die before benefits begin, but this is offset by larger decreases in RRR for those dying between ages 85 and 89 and smaller increases in RRR for those living beyond age 89.

The need for longevity protection is arguably less for those in the lowest wage quartile given their greater reliance on Social Security. We broke out the overall RRR changes by age-specific wage quartiles and found that in all but the smallest DIA purchase (5 percent of the 401(k) balance), households in the lowest age-specific wage quartiles experienced a decrease in RRR from the purchase of a DIA without a pre-commencement death benefit. However, households with higher wages had a much more positive experience, with those in the second age-specific wage quartile experiencing an increase in RRR for all purchases through the 20 percent value. Households in the third age-specific wage quartile experienced an increase in RRR for all purchases through the 25 percent value, and those in the highest age-specific wage quartile experienced an increase in RRR for all purchases simulated (through the 30 percent level).
递延收入年金购买:退休收入充足的最佳水平
对于许多婴儿潮一代和x一代来说,退休储蓄不足的前景是一个非常现实的风险。然而,只有非常小比例的固定缴款(DC)和个人退休账户(IRA)余额是年金化的,而相当大比例的固定收益(DB)应计额被作为一次性分配。一些人认为成本是个问题;递延收入年金(DIAs)的目的是通过在退休后期提供每月的福利来降低储蓄超过寿命的可能性。由于他们的延迟支付,通过退休后立即开始支付的年金,可以以类似每月福利成本的一小部分提供保险。许多人认为,较低的成本至少会在一定程度上减轻退休人员在退休年龄时不愿放弃对大部分DC和/或IRA余额的控制。本期《问题简报》准备了一项新的研究,以探讨用EBRI退休准备等级(RRR)衡量的“成功”退休的概率如何随用于购买DIA的401(k)余额的百分比而变化。结果提供了所有家庭(有401(k)余额)的总和以及模拟死亡年龄。结果还提供了按年龄划分的工资四分位数。我们发现,按照目前的年金费率,在65岁时购买DIA,延后20年,没有死亡福利金,可以使购买DIA的存款准备金率(所有死亡年龄的总和)全面提高,分别为401(k)余额的5%、10%、15%和20%。然而,DIA购买的存款准备金率总体下降了25%和30%,部分原因是与长期护理成本的相互作用。如果在DIA中加入一项开始前的死亡福利,那么DIA购买的存款准备金率就会得到全面改善,分别为401(k)余额的5%、10%和15%。当结果按模拟死亡时的年龄划分时,我们发现在福利开始前死亡的人(65-84岁)和福利开始后不久死亡的人(85-89岁)的RRR总体下降。对于每一个年龄超过89岁的群体,我们发现存款准备金率增加了,而且,正如预期的那样,用于购买DIA的401(k)余额的百分比越大,存款准备金率的百分比增加就越大。如果为那些在福利开始前死亡的人增加一笔退休前死亡津贴,结果会得到显著改善,但这被85岁至89岁之间死亡的人的RRR大幅下降和89岁以上死亡的人的RRR小幅上升所抵消。对于收入最低的四分之一人群来说,考虑到他们对社会保障的依赖程度更高,他们对长寿保障的需求可以说更少。我们按年龄划分的工资四分位数划分了总体存款准备金率的变化,发现除了最小的DIA购买(占401(k)余额的5%)之外,年龄划分工资最低的四分位数家庭的存款准备金率都因购买DIA而下降,而没有开始前的死亡福利。然而,工资较高的家庭有更积极的体验,在第二个年龄特定工资四分位数的家庭,所有购买的存款准备金率都增加了20%。在第三个特定年龄工资四分位数的家庭,所有购买的存款准备金率都增加了25%,而在最高年龄特定工资四分位数的家庭,所有模拟购买的存款准备金率都增加了30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Security Bulletin
Social Security Bulletin Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信