{"title":"Modeling acoustic wave propagation and reverberation in an ice covered environment using finite element analysis","authors":"B. Simon, M. Isakson, M. Ballard","doi":"10.1121/2.0000842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A three-dimensional, longitudinally invariant, finite element model of acoustic propagation and reverberation in an ice-covered shallow water waveguide has been developed. The ice is modeled as both an elastic medium and a pressure release surface. Transmission loss levels are calculated and compared for both representations of ice. Using Fourier synthesis, the frequency-domain acoustic pressure results are transformed into the time domain, and reverberation levels are then compared for both representations of ice. The time-domain results show differences between each ice representation that are not captured in the frequency domain. Finally, some possible explanations are presented for these model differences, including compressional-to-shear wave conversion at the ice-water interface and steep incident angle scattering from the ice.A three-dimensional, longitudinally invariant, finite element model of acoustic propagation and reverberation in an ice-covered shallow water waveguide has been developed. The ice is modeled as both an elastic medium and a pressure release surface. Transmission loss levels are calculated and compared for both representations of ice. Using Fourier synthesis, the frequency-domain acoustic pressure results are transformed into the time domain, and reverberation levels are then compared for both representations of ice. The time-domain results show differences between each ice representation that are not captured in the frequency domain. Finally, some possible explanations are presented for these model differences, including compressional-to-shear wave conversion at the ice-water interface and steep incident angle scattering from the ice.","PeriodicalId":20469,"journal":{"name":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
A three-dimensional, longitudinally invariant, finite element model of acoustic propagation and reverberation in an ice-covered shallow water waveguide has been developed. The ice is modeled as both an elastic medium and a pressure release surface. Transmission loss levels are calculated and compared for both representations of ice. Using Fourier synthesis, the frequency-domain acoustic pressure results are transformed into the time domain, and reverberation levels are then compared for both representations of ice. The time-domain results show differences between each ice representation that are not captured in the frequency domain. Finally, some possible explanations are presented for these model differences, including compressional-to-shear wave conversion at the ice-water interface and steep incident angle scattering from the ice.A three-dimensional, longitudinally invariant, finite element model of acoustic propagation and reverberation in an ice-covered shallow water waveguide has been developed. The ice is modeled as both an elastic medium and a pressure release surface. Transmission loss levels are calculated and compared for both representations of ice. Using Fourier synthesis, the frequency-domain acoustic pressure results are transformed into the time domain, and reverberation levels are then compared for both representations of ice. The time-domain results show differences between each ice representation that are not captured in the frequency domain. Finally, some possible explanations are presented for these model differences, including compressional-to-shear wave conversion at the ice-water interface and steep incident angle scattering from the ice.