Adherence with the WHO's hand hygiene recommendations in an Algerian university hospital

M. Chelghoum, Nadjet Lariche, Ismahene Belbah
{"title":"Adherence with the WHO's hand hygiene recommendations in an Algerian university hospital","authors":"M. Chelghoum, Nadjet Lariche, Ismahene Belbah","doi":"10.3396/ijic.v16i3.016.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author: Chelghoum Mustapha Faculté de médecine, Université Djillali Liabes de Sidi Bel Abbes, Boulevard colonel Othmane, 22000 Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria. Email: muschelghoum@gmail.com; mustapha.chelghoum@univ-sba.dz Abstract Adherence to hand hygiene recommendations by health care workers (HCWs) participate to minimize healthcare-associated infections. There are few studies, to our present state of knowledge, which were interested in the rate of adherence in Algerian hospitals and no one on the associated factors with the non-adherence by HCWs. The objective was to determine the rate of adherence with WHO’s hand hygiene recommendations (HHR) and to identify factors associated with non-adherence, in a regional university hospital. The method used was direct observation, based on the recording of hygienic actions in opportunities for HCWs according to the WHO’s five indications. Observations were made from November 10, 2019 until January 5, 2020. To determine the factors associated with non-adherence, a questionnaire was administered to HCWs. The relationship between the different factors and the achievement of a hygiene action was evaluated by Pearson’s Chi-square test. Five hundred three opportunities for hand hygiene were observed among 206 HCWs, during 19 observation sessions. Simple handwashing was noted in 19% of hand hygiene actions. The overall adherence was 21%. There was a wide variation in the adherence rates between the different departments and the different types of HCWs. There was a statistically significant association (p <0.05) between the availability of hygiene products, skin intolerance to hygiene products and non-adherence. The relationship between workload and adherence with HHRs was not statistically significant (p=0.279). The adherence to hand hygiene recommendations remains low. Using associated factors in developing a program to improve the adherence rate will result in greater efficiency with less time and resources.","PeriodicalId":13991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection Control","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v16i3.016.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corresponding author: Chelghoum Mustapha Faculté de médecine, Université Djillali Liabes de Sidi Bel Abbes, Boulevard colonel Othmane, 22000 Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria. Email: muschelghoum@gmail.com; mustapha.chelghoum@univ-sba.dz Abstract Adherence to hand hygiene recommendations by health care workers (HCWs) participate to minimize healthcare-associated infections. There are few studies, to our present state of knowledge, which were interested in the rate of adherence in Algerian hospitals and no one on the associated factors with the non-adherence by HCWs. The objective was to determine the rate of adherence with WHO’s hand hygiene recommendations (HHR) and to identify factors associated with non-adherence, in a regional university hospital. The method used was direct observation, based on the recording of hygienic actions in opportunities for HCWs according to the WHO’s five indications. Observations were made from November 10, 2019 until January 5, 2020. To determine the factors associated with non-adherence, a questionnaire was administered to HCWs. The relationship between the different factors and the achievement of a hygiene action was evaluated by Pearson’s Chi-square test. Five hundred three opportunities for hand hygiene were observed among 206 HCWs, during 19 observation sessions. Simple handwashing was noted in 19% of hand hygiene actions. The overall adherence was 21%. There was a wide variation in the adherence rates between the different departments and the different types of HCWs. There was a statistically significant association (p <0.05) between the availability of hygiene products, skin intolerance to hygiene products and non-adherence. The relationship between workload and adherence with HHRs was not statistically significant (p=0.279). The adherence to hand hygiene recommendations remains low. Using associated factors in developing a program to improve the adherence rate will result in greater efficiency with less time and resources.
阿尔及利亚一所大学医院遵守世界卫生组织的手部卫生建议
通讯作者:Chelghoum Mustapha, universit Djillali Liabes de Sidi Bel Abbes, Boulevard col Othmane, 22000 Sidi Bel Abbes,阿尔及利亚。电子邮件:muschelghoum@gmail.com;mustapha.chelghoum@univ-sba.dz摘要卫生保健工作者(HCWs)遵守手部卫生建议参与减少卫生保健相关感染。据我们目前所知,很少有研究对阿尔及利亚医院的依从率感兴趣,也没有人对卫生保健员不依从的相关因素感兴趣。目的是确定某地区大学医院遵守世卫组织手部卫生建议的比率,并确定与不遵守建议相关的因素。使用的方法是直接观察,根据世界卫生组织的五种指征记录卫生工作者的卫生行为。观测时间为2019年11月10日至2020年1月5日。为了确定与不依从性相关的因素,对医护人员进行了问卷调查。采用皮尔逊卡方检验评估不同因素与卫生行动实现之间的关系。在19次观察期间,在206名卫生保健员中观察到5300次手部卫生机会。19%的手部卫生行动注意到简单洗手。总体依从性为21%。不同科室和不同类型医护人员的依从率差异很大。卫生用品的可获得性、皮肤对卫生用品的不耐受和不依从性之间存在统计学显著相关(p <0.05)。工作量与依从性之间的关系无统计学意义(p=0.279)。对手部卫生建议的遵守程度仍然很低。在制定计划时使用相关因素来提高依从率,将以更少的时间和资源获得更高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信