It’s Turtles All the Way down: Target Fixation and the Costs of Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Management

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Evan M. Mistur
{"title":"It’s Turtles All the Way down: Target Fixation and the Costs of Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Management","authors":"Evan M. Mistur","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While stakeholder engagement can benefit managers, its implications for decision-making are not well understood. Integrating literature on stakeholder engagement and institutional theory, this paper investigates the ramifications of stakeholder involvement on organizational decision-making. It employs a qualitative comparative case study of agency managers and stakeholders involved in sea turtle management at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to investigate the motivations and goals of different organizational actors. The results demonstrate that stakeholders can be prone to target fixation, focusing on different goals than their organization intends. Furthermore, they reveal that stakeholders’ motivations are highly resistant to attempts to align them with organizational goals, creating goal misalignment which can disrupt decision-making. These findings provide a more holistic understanding of how stakeholder engagement influences organizational management processes, formalizes how target fixation operates at the individual level, and provides critical information for administrators deciding how to utilize engagement strategies in their work.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"29 1","pages":"1348 - 1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract While stakeholder engagement can benefit managers, its implications for decision-making are not well understood. Integrating literature on stakeholder engagement and institutional theory, this paper investigates the ramifications of stakeholder involvement on organizational decision-making. It employs a qualitative comparative case study of agency managers and stakeholders involved in sea turtle management at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to investigate the motivations and goals of different organizational actors. The results demonstrate that stakeholders can be prone to target fixation, focusing on different goals than their organization intends. Furthermore, they reveal that stakeholders’ motivations are highly resistant to attempts to align them with organizational goals, creating goal misalignment which can disrupt decision-making. These findings provide a more holistic understanding of how stakeholder engagement influences organizational management processes, formalizes how target fixation operates at the individual level, and provides critical information for administrators deciding how to utilize engagement strategies in their work.
《海龟:环境管理中目标固定和利益相关者参与的成本》
虽然利益相关者参与可以使管理者受益,但其对决策的影响尚未得到很好的理解。本文结合利益相关者参与和制度理论的相关文献,探讨了利益相关者参与对组织决策的影响。它采用定性比较案例研究机构经理和利益相关者参与海龟管理在格鲁吉亚自然资源部调查动机和不同的组织行动者的目标。结果表明,利益相关者可能倾向于目标固定,关注与组织意图不同的目标。此外,它们揭示了利益相关者的动机高度抵制将其与组织目标相一致的尝试,从而造成目标错位,从而扰乱决策。这些发现提供了对利益相关者参与如何影响组织管理过程的更全面的理解,形式化了目标固定如何在个人层面上运作,并为管理员决定如何在其工作中利用参与策略提供了关键信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信